 | Main battle tanks of today.....| Modern Discuss Main battle tanks of today..... in the Other Eras forums; Pardon my French but, wtf is plasma force fields??... |
|
01-18-2008, 12:13 PM
|
#31 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 4,602
Country: | Pardon my French but, wtf is plasma force fields??
__________________ 
JAN
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!" |
| |
01-18-2008, 12:16 PM
|
#32 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 1,940
Country: | |
| |
01-18-2008, 12:21 PM
|
#34 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 792
Country: | The armor school was working on the Sci-fi version back in the 90s. They have to be getting close to completion. The MBTs are getting as complex as the aircraft. Audio detectors to locate firing positions. They are working on a system the project a digital image of the surrounding terrian on the sides of the tank. TOWs are opticaly guided and controled by wires. If the view of the BMT can be masked it will be harder to hit. Yes a stealth MBT. There is some sort of damping system to reduce the IR siggy. I have not figured out how that works. The noise level is still a problem. If helios can be made quite, I guess the MBT can be. I raid that the plasma, rail guns and lasers are being tested. My guess is that information released for the public is at lease 10 years old.
DBII |
| |
01-18-2008, 01:41 PM
|
#35 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Zlin, Czech Republic
Posts: 650
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by DBII Seesul, nice picture. I am also an old tanker. I trained on the M60 series and M1 series. 7 minutes...you are lucky. Our Col always said that if we did not destory 7 MBT and were dead in 2 mins we were not doing our jobs...
Our yearly evaluations would reflect our poor skills....lol
DBII
clank, clank, clank | think you´re right with two minutes, it sounds better to me...
Anyway, never in my life I had better fun behind the wheel (or levels) than driving a tank...
__________________ Roman Susil
Zlin, Czech Republic
...a friend of Joe Owsianik, a former left waist gunner from B-17G ''Tail End Charlie" from 2ndBG,20th Sqdn, that was forced to bail out on Aug. 29th, 1944 over my country. |
| |
01-18-2008, 01:56 PM
|
#36 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 12,369
Country: | Well, Ive read all ur posts fellas, and it still goes back to the same old story for me:
Which one has performed better in armored conflict???
Simple answer.... The Abrams... Its combat record alone makes it #1, whatever the opponent dead tank is....
__________________ "This Was a Fight to The Death.... He's Out to Kill Me, and I'm Gonna Get Him..."
-- Capt. Stan "Swede" Vejtasa "Hollywood Finally Got it Right..." - 12/15/07 |
| |
01-18-2008, 02:19 PM
|
#37 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Zlin, Czech Republic
Posts: 650
Country: | ...and what about Russian T2000 Black Eagle? Unfortunately there´s not too much infos about it on Internet... BLACK EAGLE Main Battle Tank
Altough I know it never seen combat, it doesn´t look bad...
__________________ Roman Susil
Zlin, Czech Republic
...a friend of Joe Owsianik, a former left waist gunner from B-17G ''Tail End Charlie" from 2ndBG,20th Sqdn, that was forced to bail out on Aug. 29th, 1944 over my country.
Last edited by seesul : 01-18-2008 at 02:21 PM.
|
| |
01-18-2008, 02:27 PM
|
#38 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Zlin, Czech Republic
Posts: 650
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by lesofprimus Well, Ive read all ur posts fellas, and it still goes back to the same old story for me:
Which one has performed better in armored conflict???
Simple answer.... The Abrams... Its combat record alone makes it #1, whatever the opponent dead tank is.... | yes, you´re right probably. In desert storm there were even some Abrams opponents to Abrams. Few Abrams destroyed by friendly fire...Don´t know if by Abrams or another gun. I don´t belive in wikipedia too much M1 Abrams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________ Roman Susil
Zlin, Czech Republic
...a friend of Joe Owsianik, a former left waist gunner from B-17G ''Tail End Charlie" from 2ndBG,20th Sqdn, that was forced to bail out on Aug. 29th, 1944 over my country.
Last edited by seesul : 01-18-2008 at 03:26 PM.
|
| |
01-18-2008, 05:13 PM
|
#39 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 792
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by seesul yes, you´re right probably. In desert storm there were even some Abrams opponents to Abrams. Few Abrams destroyed by friendly fire...Don´t know if by Abrams or another gun. I don´t belive in wikipedia too much M1 Abrams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia | There is always that OOPs factor
DBII
Last edited by DBII : 01-19-2008 at 03:18 PM.
|
| |
01-18-2008, 07:35 PM
|
#40 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 588
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by seesul yes, you´re right probably. In desert storm there were even some Abrams opponents to Abrams. Few Abrams destroyed by friendly fire...Don´t know if by Abrams or another gun. I don´t belive in wikipedia too much M1 Abrams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia | . . . . and I don't know how much to believe Tom Clancy, but in his book Armored Cavalry - A Guided Tour of an Armored Cavalry Regiment (1994) he mentions an Abrams that got stuck in mud and was not able to be recovered, even with two other Abrams tanks trying to pull it out. It was decided to destroy it with a thermite grenade, but the on-board fire suppression system put the fire out as soon as it started. Then it was deciced to destroy the tank with a couple of 120mm rounds from the other two Abrams, but none of the rounds fired from point-blank range penetrated the DU armor (supposedly). The tank was finally "destroyed" by an air strike (F-18's, I think), but the tank was later recovered and repaired.
__________________ |
| |
01-18-2008, 08:17 PM
|
#41 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: George - South Africa
Posts: 2,182
Country: | The Leopard 2 is the best all round tank.
__________________
The ultimate revolution in aircraft designs during WW2. |
| |
01-19-2008, 06:14 AM
|
#42 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet From my understanding the new Leopard 2A-6 from my undestanding has the edge based on technology, armour, and capability.
It is however not battle proven.
EDIT: The Leopard 2 has been in combat (just not tank to tank combat). The Canadians are using the A6 in Afghanistan.
| Can you believe the IDIOTS up here are PROTESTING that we got them? They say that too many soldiers are dying in AFGANISTAN - - then complain that the Government bought the better armored LEP - 2's for the Army! Maybe we should go back to VALENTINE tanks!  Huh? |
| |
01-19-2008, 08:15 AM
|
#43 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 4,602
Country: | Aren't the Challenger II the fastest tank in the world, over rough terrain?
__________________ 
JAN
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!" |
| |
01-19-2008, 03:47 PM
|
#44 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 792
Country: | I would not believe everthing in the book. If a tank was stuck and the Plt could not retrieve it, the normal procedure would be to bring in the Trp's M-88to pull it out. It that did not work then the Sqdrn's M88 would be brought in and the two of them could extract it. The M88 is a powerful mofo. It can drag a M1 across the ground without much trouble. The thermite is put inside the breach to destory the breachblock and maybe one on the engine. The helon fire surpression system is amazing. It detects fire in milli seconds. It was designed to reduce the damage to the interior electronics by removing the air from the crew compartments. If the M1 had the 105 mm cannon, it would have had trouble with a head on kill and 2 - 3 km but not at battle site, 800 m. Sounds like it was a good story though. It is hard to imagine a situation during the Gulf War when the area was not secured enough to extract an M1. |
| |
01-21-2008, 12:26 PM
|
#45 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 4,602
Country: | Was just thinking earlier tonight....(I know...just shut up will you!)... If Challenger II, Abrams and what not would be today's Sherman, T-34 etc.... what would the figures be for the equivalent of a Panther, Tiger and Tiger II if they'd have the same advantage today as they had in WWII?
__________________ 
JAN
"I´m going back to the front to relax"
"THE BLACK CATS FLIES TONIGHT"
"Find your enemy and shoot him down - everything else is unimportant"
"When you're out of F-8's... You're out of fighters!" |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM. |  | |