 | Main battle tanks of today.....| Modern Discuss Main battle tanks of today..... in the Other Eras forums; All I know is that there's allot of commotion around this issue at the moment, and it seems esp. ... |
|
05-05-2008, 06:53 PM
|
#91 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
| All I know is that there's allot of commotion around this issue at the moment, and it seems esp. SAAB is gaining an edge as their prize tag and delivery plan seems to fit more of the customers.
Are you saying you havent heard about this before Matt ??
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
05-05-2008, 06:58 PM
|
#92 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,985
Country: | I absolutely have. And I understand the issue. It is not about upgrades, it is about indigenous maintenance at major checks for the stealth aspects and ability to modify core software. Both claimed as essential for an independent nation to upkeep their air assets and qualify them for future compatibility with different mission software, weapon payload and C4I. I understand.
But if no likey, buy Saab. And I would suggest, buy many.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
05-05-2008, 07:16 PM
|
#93 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
| IMO Lockheed should make it available, they'd score allot of costumers that way I'm sure, esp. seeing many of the nations are really enthustiastic about the VTOL design as that will mean much smaller airfields are needed. Quote: |
And I would suggest, buy many.
| Why buy many ?
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
05-05-2008, 07:32 PM
|
#94 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,985
Country: | Because you get what you pay for.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
05-05-2008, 07:33 PM
|
#95 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
| Hehe not always..
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
05-05-2008, 08:47 PM
|
#96 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,985
Country: | Okay buddy.
Where abouts in Germany do you live in Soren?
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
05-05-2008, 09:11 PM
|
#97 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
| Despite what you believe I don't live in Germany.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
05-05-2008, 09:14 PM
|
#98 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,985
Country: | Oh. I saw Adler ask you a few times and you didn't respond. The Mods can trace your IP, so I just assumed.
Tell me my guess is right, you are a states boy.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
05-05-2008, 09:17 PM
|
#99 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,985
Country: | Besides... I couldn't figure out why you would be prowling around this site at 0530 German local time.
So whereabouts, Soren?
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
05-05-2008, 09:26 PM
|
#100 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
| Never told anyone and wont for some time  As I said in another thread, I appreciate my anonymity.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
05-05-2008, 09:40 PM
|
#101 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 Besides... I couldn't figure out why you would be prowling around this site at 0530 German local time.  | Well I do live within that time zone (It's 4:30 btw), and the reason I'm up this late is that I'm on watch 
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
05-05-2008, 10:33 PM
|
#102 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,985
Country: | And Soren, there you have a friend. Enuf said. May I ask your nationality though.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
05-05-2008, 11:04 PM
|
#103 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
| Quote: |
And Soren, there you have a friend. Enuf said.
| What do you mean ? Quote: |
May I ask your nationality though.
| You may ask, but I wont tell 
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Last edited by Soren : 05-05-2008 at 11:18 PM.
|
| |
05-06-2008, 12:33 AM
|
#104 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,615
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308
Where abouts in Germany do you live in Soren? | He does not live in Germany. He is in Denmark.
Same timezone though.
Great place but very expensive. I was offered a job up in Denmark and I turned it down only because of the taxes.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" |
| |
05-06-2008, 02:29 AM
|
#105 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 707
Country: | Is it true that the Canucks have not replaced their MBTs, instead opting for a 105mm armed vehicle called the "Stryker". The whole issue of MBT replacement is very topical at the moment. The US, has for example, found that it has never used more than 25% of the available tank forces at its disposal, whereas its Infantry formations are strained to the limit. The rough rule of thumb is that for every armoured formation available, there is a need for an equivalent three or four Mech inf formations. Neither the US nor Australia are able to field that many Mech Inf units, so the force structure appears to be "tank heavy".
The other consideration is whether or not MBTs are now basically obsolete. I am personally completely undecided, but strong debate rages around this very issue. Are MBTs simply too vulnerable, given the multiple (and cheap) threats that can be brought against them. In Australias case, we have been involved in perhaps half a dozen limited wars since the end of Vietnam, and our tank forces have not been utilized in a single one. The US at least has used their armour, but it appears their forces are a bit top heavy,
Its an interesting and as yet unresolved debate. The Australian solution has been to go for a half measure, we are replacing our 103 Leopard Is with 59 second hand, and cheap, Abrams tanks for the time being. Looks for all the world like a wait and see procurement to me
__________________ Do not judge on abilities, but on choices |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM. |  | |