Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Pilot trapped for 5h in cockpit of USAF's new $135m F-22A Raptor after canopy jams

Modern Discuss Pilot trapped for 5h in cockpit of USAF's new $135m F-22A Raptor after canopy jams in the Other Eras forums; Originally Posted by mkloby I wonder how hawkeyes or awacs pick up a 22... Transponder......


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Other Eras > Modern

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-04-2006, 06:18 PM   #46
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby View Post
I wonder how hawkeyes or awacs pick up a 22...
Transponder...
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 06:45 PM   #47
Senior Member
 
Soundbreaker Welch?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,515
Country:
I heard that after the F-22 is gone, The USAF will simply switch to computer driven aircraft. No human pilots flying in the sky. Save on space and protection for the cockpit. Bummer for adventure.


Probably someday, a "hot-shot" pilot will be sitting at some military base and be looking at a computer screen with a vibrating joystick in his hand and instead of manuvering a Simulater plane he will be manuvering a real plane over enemy territory. Ooops, plane lost, game over, and you are now a prisoner of lunch time.


Then it will really be the Chair Force.
__________________

"His motor's conked out!"
"What's the differance, they're all Nazis!"
"Luke, shut up!"
"Fear the hook!"
"Oh.....I wanna fly."
"You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?"
"What you doing? Oh Nooooo!"

Last edited by Soundbreaker Welch? : 12-04-2006 at 06:53 PM.
Soundbreaker Welch? is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 06:50 PM   #48
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundbreaker Welch? View Post
I heard that after the F-22 is gone, The USAF will simply switch to computer driven aircraft. No human pilots flying in the sky. Bummer.


Probably someday, a "hot-shot" pilot will be sitting at some military base and be looking at a computer screen with a vibrating joystick in his hand and instead of manuvering a Simulater plane he will be manuvering a real one over enemy territory.


Then it will really be the Chair Force.
Don't hold your breath - in the late 50s some USAF and Pentagon wizkids said that dogfights will be a thing of the past and all fighters will be armed with missiles.

A few years later a little situation called Vietnam proved them very wrong...

I think UAVs will be the next wave of the future and will be used in conjunction with manned combat aircraft.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 08:06 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,258
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ View Post
Transponder...
I meant in terms of just using their primary radar to track an F-22... what kind of return it gets...
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines
mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 08:53 PM   #50
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby View Post
I meant in terms of just using their primary radar to track an F-22... what kind of return it gets...



.


__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 09:07 PM   #51
Senior Member
 
pbfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,757
Country:
When they fly on non operational sorties is it not common to leave the aircraft in a dirty mode or not totally stealthy
__________________
pbfoot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 09:26 PM   #52
Junior Member
 
mekgp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
He could have used the "eject" sequence??!!
Seriously, or...err...is the "eject" in the ol' Raptor a single sequence of events? Pilot hits the button and its all over but the landing???
__________________
Somewhere between "here" and "there"!
mekgp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 09:55 PM   #53
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mekgp View Post
He could have used the "eject" sequence??!!
Seriously, or...err...is the "eject" in the ol' Raptor a single sequence of events? Pilot hits the button and its all over but the landing???
The screws that backed out actually pined the canopy down. To do any egress sequence would of probably meant a lot of damage to the plane and pilot - the right thing was done, hook an AC unit up to the aircraft and just cut him out.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 11:22 PM   #54
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,895
Country:
And FBJ is right. Manned aircraft are going to be around for a LONG time. What you are going to see is a more integrated use of UAV/UAS along with manned aircraft in a manner that will allow a significant increase in force projection, minimize pilot risk and maximize resource application to the mission at hand. Technologies that promote information exchange to shorten the kill chain, minimize collateral damage and allow near real-time BDA are the name of the game. UAV/UAS will serve a surrogate role to manned aircraft to make that happen. We have entered a truly new era. As I write this, civil regulations, policy and technical standards are being identified for UAV/UAS introduction into the national airspace system. However, for military tactical oeprations a gamer with a joystick winning wars solo is only a pipedream.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2006, 03:12 PM   #55
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 21
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot View Post
its fairly easy to entertain a pilot just jingle some keys or something similar and your good for hours
ROFLMAO
Husky is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2006, 11:04 PM   #56
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,206
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby View Post
I meant in terms of just using their primary radar to track an F-22... what kind of return it gets...
That's highly classified. The F-22 is thought to have better stealth characteristics than the F-117 and probably as good as the B-2 at certain angles. I would guess that it would have to be pretty close to detect and closer still to track. At least I hope so. That is why it was built.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2006, 11:09 PM   #57
Senior Member
 
mkloby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,258
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by davparlr View Post
That's highly classified. The F-22 is thought to have better stealth characteristics than the F-117 and probably as good as the B-2 at certain angles. I would guess that it would have to be pretty close to detect and closer still to track. At least I hope so. That is why it was built.
Hence the term "wonder!"
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines
mkloby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2006, 11:14 PM   #58
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,206
Country:
We have discussed this on another thread. This is strange picture. Note the airpseed is 179 kts at 18k ft., angle of attack is 20.3 degrees !!, and the F-22 is passing horizontally by windscreen. I don't think this is a dogfight picture. The F-22 would only be a target for fraction of a second (enough, of course) as it flashed by. I suspect the f-18 pilot saw the F-22 crossing his path, raised his nose for camera shot. I don't think you can make a judgment on the manueverability of the F-22 vs. F-18. And besides, the F-22 is designed to get close enough to the ememy to launch missiles without being detected. This situation should never exist. By the way, does anyone know when the last real dogfight took place?
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2006, 06:39 PM   #59
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,256
Country:
I don't know exactly but I would say it was sometime during Vietnam that the last dog-fight occurred. Although after Vietnam small rag-tag militia and that did operate old prop aircraft so it is difficult to say when definately and be right. But Vietnam probably contained the last official recorded dog-fight.
HealzDevo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2006, 10:40 PM   #60
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HealzDevo View Post
I don't know exactly but I would say it was sometime during Vietnam that the last dog-fight occurred. Although after Vietnam small rag-tag militia and that did operate old prop aircraft so it is difficult to say when definately and be right. But Vietnam probably contained the last official recorded dog-fight.
Do you really follow aviation? Since Vietnam there has been dozens of dogfights - Bekka Valley in 1984 is just one example!!!! The Falklands, Gulf War 1, Angola, the Iran Iraq War, that's just off the top of my head!!!!
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Best Bf - 109 Variant ? lesofprimus Aviation 522 07-12-2005 11:35 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com