Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

regarding biplane

Modern Discuss regarding biplane in the Other Eras forums; It is my first thread in the forum. Who can tell me why biplane is not popular after WWII. I ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Other Eras > Modern

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-12-2006, 11:48 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6
regarding biplane

It is my first thread in the forum.

Who can tell me why biplane is not popular after WWII.

I think biplane advantage is obvious. Two(Four) wings can provide double float power than a(two) wings. It is right? So a biplane can take almost double weight goods with a same power as a normal plane.
donkeyking is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 12:12 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
loomaluftwaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,848
Country:
no, the biplane created more drag and thus was slower, and it would have been heavier cause u got another wing to carry on ur back

and besides, a monoplane will be easier to mass produce cause u will need only half as many wings to produce for a monoplane
__________________


"The German Luftwaffe always fought without any reserves. This is also the reason why we have pilots with extremely high numbers of victories."
- General der Jagdflieger Adolf Galland"


loomaluftwaffe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 06:50 AM   #3
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,187
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by donkeyking
It is my first thread in the forum.

Who can tell me why biplane is not popular after WWII.

I think biplane advantage is obvious. Two(Four) wings can provide double float power than a(two) wings. It is right? So a biplane can take almost double weight goods with a same power as a normal plane.
Does not work that way. Monoplanes usually do not require bracing and struts therefor typically have less drag than a biplane.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2006, 11:06 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
R988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Londonium
Posts: 610
Well there was the An-2 I suppose, but otherwise as above.
__________________
Never mistake knowledge for wisdom. One helps you make a living; the other helps you make a life.
R988 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 04:49 AM   #5
Master of Ewes
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country:
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
there will always be exceptions to the rules, but for combat aircraft manouverability was being replaced in favour for speed and armament, a monoplane will give you that speed..........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2006, 09:11 AM   #6
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,834
Country:
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
The AN-2 is more of a specialized plane built to transport cargo into the remotest of Russian territories. The biplane design gives great lift, but the speed suffers as well. It has great STOL capabilities and is quite durable, but it is certainly not an aircraft that I would want to fly into a hot zone.
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda.
evangilder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 06:13 AM   #7
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,187
Country:
And besides most monoplanes can outmaneuver the biplanes anyhow. Simple rules of technology and aerodynamics.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2006, 09:04 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
R988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Londonium
Posts: 610
I think the original post was about lifting goods, ie transport as opposed to combat, but maybe I misread.

I hear boxwings are popular in design concepts for future transport aircraft and have seen quite a few concept drawings of these.

heres the first example I found for those who dont know what a box wing is
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/2289/a400bx6vh.jpg
__________________
Never mistake knowledge for wisdom. One helps you make a living; the other helps you make a life.
R988 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2006, 03:35 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
elmilitaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 405
Country:
Nice picture.
__________________



"And when he gets to heaven,
To Saint Peter he will tell;
One more marine reporting, sir-
I've served my time in hell."

A marine gravemarker on guadalcanal
elmilitaro is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 12:16 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,256
Country:
Also a biplane the extra wing creates problems with manevourability. Prior to WW1 there were problems which caused the monoplane to be outlawed however, when properly braced they were fine. It was finally realised in WW2 that a powerful engine combined with a monoplane frame could outperform a biplane design.
HealzDevo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 07:29 AM   #11
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HealzDevo View Post
Also a biplane the extra wing creates problems with manevourability. Prior to WW1 there were problems which caused the monoplane to be outlawed however, when properly braced they were fine. It was finally realised in WW2 that a powerful engine combined with a monoplane frame could outperform a biplane design.
Dude - you don't know what you're talking about...

A bi-plane's wing can offer twice the lifting surface (twice the wing area) of a monoplane but because of bracing and the induced drag produced by the second wing prohibits it in speed. The monoplane was never "outlawed" and the first successful German fighter the Fokker Eindecker was a monoplane.




Many pilots didn't trust the monoplane in WW1 and many of the designers stayed with the contemporary bi-plane configuration. When more powerful engines came on board as well as improved internal wing construction, the bi-plane faded away.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 01:53 PM   #12
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,893
Country:
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Best Biplane Fighter of WW2 cheddar cheese Polls 207 07-29-2008 04:29 AM
WW1 Bombers. cheddar cheese World War I 66 07-12-2006 04:12 AM
Biplane Fighters NR61 Aviation 25 02-10-2006 09:56 PM
Allied Silver-Match (Biplanes) DAVIDICUS Aviation 28 05-02-2005 02:42 PM
The best biplane fighter of the war Samu Old Threads 171 07-01-2004 11:49 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93