Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Thoughts on potential and development

Modern Discuss Thoughts on potential and development in the Other Eras forums; High powered AESA radars that allow spoofing, intrusion, data mining, information transfer and narrow beam EMP that either disables or ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Other Eras > Modern

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-11-2007, 12:05 PM   #16
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,088
Country:
High powered AESA radars that allow spoofing, intrusion, data mining, information transfer and narrow beam EMP that either disables or destroys electronics.

Netcentric communications with UCAVs that allowing swarming techniques to overwhelm ground sensors, SAMs, and targets.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2007, 11:05 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,256
Country:
Still the whole point is that stealth strikes and attacks may have been an even bigger advantage when the naval F-117 was proposed due to the fact that an aircraft carrier moves around and it is harder to get a lock on these aircraft, thus it means that it is harder for the enemy to simply follow your aircraft on radar and then destroy the carrier. Strike, return and you are hard to track. This was 1980s right through to 1994 that this project was ongoing. It was only the airforce that killed the F-117 project by threatening the F-22 Raptor project that destroyed any chance this great aircraft had. It should have been in service as the start of a naval upgrade but it has died. Naval aviation is only just beginning to catch up with Stealth which the airforce has had since October 1983. With the naval versions of the F-117 project at least the strike capability would have caught up with land...
HealzDevo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 06:11 AM   #18
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,008
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HealzDevo View Post
Still the whole point is that stealth strikes and attacks may have been an even bigger advantage when the naval F-117 was proposed due to the fact that an aircraft carrier moves around and it is harder to get a lock on these aircraft, thus it means that it is harder for the enemy to simply follow your aircraft on radar and then destroy the carrier. Strike, return and you are hard to track. This was 1980s right through to 1994 that this project was ongoing. It was only the airforce that killed the F-117 project by threatening the F-22 Raptor project that destroyed any chance this great aircraft had. It should have been in service as the start of a naval upgrade but it has died. Naval aviation is only just beginning to catch up with Stealth which the airforce has had since October 1983. With the naval versions of the F-117 project at least the strike capability would have caught up with land...
I don't know where you're coming up with this stuff but once again someone is dreaming. The F-117 could carry only 2 bombs - the US Navy didn't want it based on the bomb loads and capabilities of aircraft currently in use. There was no ongoing Navy F-117 program, I worked at Lockheed through the 80s and was at one time on the program. The F-22 was conceived and developed under an entirely different specification and program - its an air-to-air fighter!!!!
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 09:38 AM   #19
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 29,456
Country:
Woh the enemy is going to know where that carrier is no matter what Healz. Where do you come up with this Sci Fi stuff?
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86