![]() |
| |||||||
| Modern A place to discuss Vietnam through present. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,232
| Quote:
Quote:
WW II and Korea. "The greatest battle implement ever devised." -- General George S. Patton, Jr.
__________________ ![]() “Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind." | ||
| | |
| | #32 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 4,029
| There's been talk for sometime Chris that the 36 will replace the SA80 as standard British infantry weapon I have only handle the 80 and not discharged one but it does'nt feel a very robust rifle and having spoken to a guy who worked in Royal Ordinace during it's development he told me the original test weapons were excellent but after they had to reduce the unit costs it turned into a poor gun although the later upgraded version is supposedly reliable. |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 173
| Absolutely true trackend, it was down to RA being told to produce it for £x a weapon. Stupid when you factor in the cost of the H&K upgrade. As I understand it it was a political decision not a Forces budget decision that caused all the problems. |
| | |
| | #34 | |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| Quote:
I have fired the SA80 when we did training up in England and honestly I would take G36 over the SA80 anyday. But then again I also preferred the M-16/M-4 over teh SA80 as well.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] | |
| | |
| | #35 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 981
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
| I'm going to pick a nit here. I saw the program and I believe that to include assault weapons in the list is comparing apples and oranges. Neither the AK, the Mouse-16, the AUG or the MP 43 can be considered a combat rifle (MBR). First and formost, the 5.56mm and the 7.62 short and the 7.92 Kurtz are intermediate power cartridges and not MBR cartridges such as the 303 Brit, 30-06, 7.92 Mauser round or the 7.62 x 51. Just my humble opinion! Pax Christi Rev. Joel+ |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| What are you talking about? The M-16 and AK are fine combat weapons. I used the M-16 for years when I was in the US Army.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 173
| I've got the answer: If you're carrying it? - M-16 If you're cleaning it? - AK47 If you're drilling with it? - Lee-Enfield Hordes of Ruskies appearing at 300 yards? - FN FAL/'tweaked' SLR (with 30 round Bren box on it) |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Senior Member | Sorry for the lateness of my reply I live in Gladstone, near rocky.
__________________ "Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor. |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Banned Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 125
| In my army-times, I only used the G3, Uzi and MG3. G3: nice weapon, on 200 m precise (I always hit the 6 to 10...). As long you were not in a sandy area... JAM... As I know, they realy like the new HK G36 in the German army. One I know, he said it is the best one in the world now. If it is true, I don't know. |
| | |
| | #41 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 3,271
| Good stuff Rog and if you have a regiment of German infantry in the open at a range of 800 yards in 1914, the 3O3 British SMLE and trained like the "Old Contemptibles" were. |
| | |
| | #42 | |
| Der Crewchief ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| Quote:
After that fun filled weekend we all decided we would trade our M-16 in for a G36 anyday.
__________________ ![]() fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] | |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Member Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 30
| I think the M-1 garand was better then the Enfield but in my opinion. It was used all the way into Viet Nam and was very accurate, I can understand the AK-47 being ahead of the M-16. And again in my view everything Hekler and Koch makes is the bomb diggity! |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Senior Member | Hi guys! I`ve only found this thread now, so if you don`t mind i will post my opinion!! herei s the list: 1. HK G36 2. AK-47 3. HK G3 4. M-16 5. Mauser model 98K Carbine 6. M1 Garand 7. Lee Enfield SMLE 8. 1903 Springfield 9. Sturmgewher 44 (MP43) 10. M14 has for the FN FAL, is a sorry excuse for a rifle!!! I will tell you why, the Portuguese Air Force Paratroopers used it in The colonial wars in the 60s, and was even worst them the AR-15 they allready used, the barrels bent with the use! not something you are loking in your rifle is it? we had no trouble with the substitute for it! the Portuguese made HK G3 only problem is only uses 20 rounds in Mag! or it would be nr.1 for me!! |
| | |
| | #45 |
| Member | i have to agry whit this list bout i think they shoud put the g-36 in there
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |