Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Your top 10 modern fighters

Modern Discuss Your top 10 modern fighters in the Other Eras forums; Originally Posted by ozumn its Gripen, it has very low radar signature it have supercruse and im sure it has ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Other Eras > Modern

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-04-2006, 08:56 AM   #91
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,967
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozumn
its Gripen, it has very low radar signature it have supercruse and im sure it has about the same manouverbility in a dog fight as any new plane, but we wil see it will be fun.
The Gripen is not a pure stealth aircraft, although it has a very low radar signature and although it did well in exercises against the Norwegian AF it does not have the "legs" or the bomb carrying capability of the F-16 and that's why many nations have continued to purchase the F-16 over the Gripen if they require a multi role strike capability.

The F-22 avionics suite and especially the F-35 (airframe and avionics) is a generation a head of the Gripen
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2006, 04:01 PM   #92
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLYBOYJ
The Gripen is not a pure stealth aircraft, although it has a very low radar signature and although it did well in exercises against the Norwegian AF it does not have the "legs" or the bomb carrying capability of the F-16 and that's why many nations have continued to purchase the F-16 over the Gripen if they require a multi role strike capability.

The F-22 avionics suite and especially the F-35 (airframe and avionics) is a generation a head of the Gripen
did well hmm i would say no match, the few times that i been on exercises when the f16 was the dogfight oponent the f16 sisnt stand a chance it was clear victory all the time. and i still say just wait by the time the f22 is out there will be new gripen also.
__________________
http://www.gripen.com/
ozumn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2006, 04:34 PM   #93
Senior Member
 
Henk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: George - South Africa
Posts: 2,543
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Henk
If you guys know about the South African Bush War in Angola the South African Airforce used the Mirrage and the Communists used the MIGs. The MIGs were way better and newer but who whippet who's a**?

It is the Pilot and not just the machine who makes it a great aircraft or not. I must say that the Gripen is the best fighter for its prise and can do many things that just dog fight, thus you do not need to buy other aircraft to fill the other roles.

Henk
__________________


The ultimate revolution in aircraft designs during WW2
Henk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 09:02 AM   #94
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,967
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozumn
did well hmm i would say no match, the few times that i been on exercises when the f16 was the dogfight oponent the f16 sisnt stand a chance it was clear victory all the time. and i still say just wait by the time the f22 is out there will be new gripen also.
What "new" Gripen? Are you trying to say that Saab is going to attempt to update the aircraft? You could only pump so much into that airframe and its already been shown that the Grippen's inability to carry substantial air to ground stores has handicapped it in foreign sales. But then again it is designed as an interceptor with some air to ground mission capability....

BTW the exercises you were talking about was against the Norwegian Air Force, one of the weaker NATO members in the air-to-air intercept role. I'd like to see the Gripen piloted against US or even Israeli F-16 pilots. Over all the Gripen is a superior aircraft but it won't be an "easy kill" against a seasoned air force in a tactical role.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 09:15 AM   #95
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,967
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henk
If you guys know about the South African Bush War in Angola the South African Airforce used the Mirrage and the Communists used the MIGs. The MIGs were way better and newer but who whippet who's a**?

It is the Pilot and not just the machine who makes it a great aircraft or not. I must say that the Gripen is the best fighter for its prise and can do many things that just dog fight, thus you do not need to buy other aircraft to fill the other roles.

Henk
Know about it well and the SAAF did extrememly well against Angola, here's a site that give information for kills an losses of the SAAF.

http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/printer_184.shtml
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 09:51 AM   #96
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
Country:
no i think it was in Neatherlands, and i was just talking to my brother a gripen pilot he says that you can put any pilot from what ever nation the f16 want last long, he told me about the the finnish f18 they could put out a goodfight at high altitud.
__________________
http://www.gripen.com/
ozumn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 10:11 AM   #97
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,967
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozumn
no i think it was in Neatherlands, and i was just talking to my brother a gripen pilot he says that you can put any pilot from what ever nation the f16 want last long, he told me about the the finnish f18 they could put out a goodfight at high altitud.
Ahh a little family prejudice?!?

The Gripen does have an excellent linking system, but the link-16 has brought the Falcon with parity here.

Link-16 shares target info, radar contacts, SAR images, and IIR targeting pod images. Can also get GPS coordinates from any C3ISR platform.

As far as ergonomics and ease of operation, Id give the prize to the Gripen. The cockpit is full glass, with excellent HOTAS and HUD. Large fully programmable MFDs display whatever the pilot wants. The cockpit is truly a gem.

But for payload, range, and T/W ratio, I think the Viper gets the nod. The Gripen is a much smaller aircraft, and with just s single F404 engine, there just isnt the capacity for as much "stuff" as the Viper.

The Gripen has just a fantastic pilot interface though.

ALTHOUGH....

F-16s offer the following distinct advantages:

* It is a true multi-role aircraft and can be used Air to Air or Air to Ground Role unlike Gripen which may be better for Air to Air role only;

* Low RCS of Gripen is due to its small size and a naked body only. Once you hang stores, its low RCS will disappear;

But here's something to think about...

*Gripen may out outmaneuver an older F-16 but new F-16s with their newer more powerful engines can easily turn tables on Gripen.

* Gripen's small size will become a liability in the A to G role. It does not carry more weapons as F-16 can. You keep loading heavy armaments on Gripen and you have a shortened wing life.
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 01:01 PM   #98
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 60
Country:
give up, Gripen is a exelt striker and what new f16 you must be kidding. and what has range to do with anything. F16 was a great plane but now its just good.
__________________
http://www.gripen.com/
ozumn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 01:54 PM   #99
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,967
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozumn
give up, Gripen is a exelt striker and what new f16 you must be kidding. and what has range to do with anything. F16 was a great plane but now its just good.
I worked for Lockheed and know what is going on with the program. The Gripen fits the need of Sweeden but not many are being sold, there's a reason for that. Compare the bomb loads....

Specifications (F-16C Block 30)

F-16 3 View SchematicGeneral characteristics
Crew: 1
Length: 49 ft 5 in (14.8 m)
Wingspan: 32 ft 8 in (9.8 m)
Height: 16 ft (4.8 m)
Wing area: 300 ft² (27.87 m²)
Airfoil: NACA 64A204 root and tip
Empty weight: 18,238 lb (8,272 kg)
Loaded weight: 26,463 lb (12,003 kg)
Maximum gross takeoff weight: 42,300 lb (16,875 kg)
Powerplant: 1× Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220 or 1× General Electric F110-GE-100 afterburning turbofan, F100 14,590 lbf dry and 23,770 lbf with afterburning; F110 17,155 lbf dry, 28,985 lbf with afterburning (F100 64.9 kN / 105.7 kN; F110 76.3 kN / 128.9 kN)
Performance
Maximum speed: Mach 2.05 at altitude, 1,321 mph (2,100 km/h)
Range: 2,000+ mi ferry (3,200+ km)
Service ceiling: 55,000+ ft (15,240+ m)
Rate of climb: 50,000 ft/min (255 m/s)
Wing loading: 53 lb/ft² (260 kg/m²)
Thrust/weight: 0.91
Armament
Guns: 1× M61 Vulcan 20 mm Gatling gun
Rockets: CRV-7
Missiles:
Air-to-air: 6× AIM-9 Sidewinder, 6× AIM-120 AMRAAM
Air-to-ground: 6× AGM-65 Maverick, 4× AGM-88 HARM
Anti-ship: 4× AGM-119 Penguin
Bombs: 2× CBU-87 cluster, 2× CBU-89 gator mine, 2× CBU-97, 2× GBU-10 Paveway, GBU-12 Paveway II, Paveway-series laser-guided bombs, 2× JDAM, 6× Mk 80 series, and also nuclear bombs such as the B61 nuclear bomb.

Specifications (JAS-39 Gripen)
General characteristics
Crew: 1-2
Length: 14.1 m (46 ft 3 in)
Wingspan: 8.4 m (27 ft 7 in)
Height: 4.5 m (14 ft 9 in)
Wing area: 25.54 m (274.9 ft)
Empty weight: 6,620 kg (14,600 lb)
Loaded weight: 8,720 kg (19,200 lb)
Maximum gross takeoff weight: 14,000 kg (31,000 lb)
Powerplant: 1× Volvo Aero RM12 (GE404) afterburning turbofan, 54 kN dry, 80 kN with afterburner (12,000 lbf / 18,000 lbf)
Wheel track: 2.4 m (7 ft 10 in)
Performance
Maximum speed: Mach 2
Range: 800 km (500 mi)
Service ceiling: 15,000 m (50,000 ft)
Rate of climb: m/s (ft/min)
Wing loading: kg/m² (lb/ft²)
Thrust/weight: 0.63
Armament
1x 27 mm Mauser BK-27 cannon
6x AIM-9 Sidewinder
4x AIM-120 AMRAAM or MICA
AGM-65 Maverick, KEPD 150, or various other laser-guided bombs, rocket pods.


The Gripen is a great plane and a half of step ahead of the F-16 in many cases but the F-16 can still compete with it - Now compare the Gripen with the F-22 or F-35 (Or even the Eurofighter) and once again these aircraft hold an commanding performance lead in almost all areas.....
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"

Last edited by FLYBOYJ : 05-05-2006 at 01:59 PM.
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 05:06 PM   #100
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,150
Country:
Wow. With a GE404 engine, Gripen is more in the league of the F-20. I can see why a plane that small would be a tough dogfighter. Also, I see why its use is somewhat limited.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 05:21 PM   #101
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,967
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by davparlr
Wow. With a GE404 engine, Gripen is more in the league of the F-20. I can see why a plane that small would be a tough dogfighter. Also, I see why its use is somewhat limited.
Great comparison and you hit it right on the head!!!
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 05:25 PM   #102
Senior Member
 
pbfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NIAGARA
Posts: 4,353
Country:
The Gripen was designed for the defence of Sweden it does'nt have to go very far and would be basically a Air defence weapon its not really an offensive threat buts its STOL characteristics and its ability to deploy locally easily make it ideal for Sweden
__________________
pbfoot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 05:26 PM   #103
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 12,967
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbfoot
The Gripen was designed for the defence of Sweden it does'nt have to go very far and would be basically a Air defence weapon its not really an offensive threat buts its STOL characteristics and its ability to deploy locally easily make it ideal for Sweden
Agree!! And unless another air force has a similar requirement, they ain't selling very many....
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 06:06 PM   #104
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 12,897
Country:
I dont think they really want to export very many of them anyways, so it all works out for Sweden....

All the spare parts they'll ever need.....
__________________


"Boyington was a Drunk, but He was a Drunk We'd Follow Straight Into Hell..."
--Lt. William Northrop Case
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 06:11 PM   #105
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 12,897
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozumn
the few times that i been on exercises when the f16 was the dogfight oponent the f16 sisnt stand a chance it was clear victory all the time.
__________________


"Boyington was a Drunk, but He was a Drunk We'd Follow Straight Into Hell..."
--Lt. William Northrop Case
lesofprimus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52