 | The odd questions thread| OFF-Topic / Misc. Discuss The odd questions thread in the Current forums; I shall be asking some questions here which don't make sense, but will be grateful to get answers that ... |
|
08-30-2008, 06:18 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Deep in suburban Surrey
Posts: 1,432
Country:  | The odd questions thread
I shall be asking some questions here which don't make sense, but will be grateful to get answers that do make sense:
1st: Could you run a modern jet on the fuel they were using in 1940?
If not, could modern fuel be refined from existing stocks at that time?
__________________  | 
|  | |
08-30-2008, 06:51 PM
|
#2 | | aka Dickcheese
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,897
Country:  | I'm not a chemist, but yes you could. However, the lifecycle of the modern turbojet/turbofan engine would be greatly jeopardized since the 1940s fuel did not contain the detergents that modern fuel contains. However, the kinetic energy per fuel mass implies that it certainly could be used.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts | |
| | |
08-30-2008, 08:00 PM
|
#3 | | Older Than Dirt
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 5,245
Country: | Wouldn't that depend on which country's fuel you'd be using ? If you recall,
Italy's avgas was so bad it killed the P-38's engines.
Charles
__________________  I can only please one person per day.
Today is not your day.
Tomorrow doesn't look good either.... | |
| | |
08-30-2008, 08:01 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Deep in suburban Surrey
Posts: 1,432
Country: | Oh, it would be Britain... I guess fuel was imported from the US in those days?
__________________ | |
| | |
08-30-2008, 09:12 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,260
Country: | Turbine engines can combust a wide array of fuel, so it is possible. As Matt alluded to, the continued reliable operation of the engine on avgas would be suspect.
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines | |
| | |
08-31-2008, 04:11 AM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Deep in suburban Surrey
Posts: 1,432
Country: | OK
2nd: How does the ammunition compare between now and 1940?
I'm talking about cannon shells and the specific explosive power in the cartridge.
Also, does a longer barrel give you more range, or just more accuracy?
__________________ | |
| | |
09-06-2008, 10:10 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,260
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Clave  OK
2nd: How does the ammunition compare between now and 1940?
I'm talking about cannon shells and the specific explosive power in the cartridge.
Also, does a longer barrel give you more range, or just more accuracy? | I'm not an arty guy, so I can't help too much with ballistics. However, longer barrels I believe generally give higher muzzle velocities, which both give more effective range and accuracy up to a given point where they then tend to decrease accuracy and range (due to rigidity and recoil control). Someone that has a better grasp on ballistics should be able to better answer though.
__________________
If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines | |
| | |
09-06-2008, 10:31 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 802
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by ccheese Wouldn't that depend on which country's fuel you'd be using ? If you recall,
Italy's avgas was so bad it killed the P-38's engines.
Charles | I believe he's talking about jet fuel, not avgas; avgas WAS quite a bit different from country to country. IIRC, the US had the "best" (read: most refined) avgas during WWII. And, yes, the Allison V-1710's on the P-38 were quite tempermental in this respect (though I suspect it had more to do with the turbosupercharging on the P-38 than the engines themselves).
In any case, jet fuel is, basically, jet fuel; I know the Avco-Lycoming gas turbine engine in the M-1 Abrams will run on just about anything, including cooking grease, diesel, refined kerosene, and gasoline (which is why it's called a "multi-fuel" engine). Just about anything that can be injected into the combustion chamber of a modern gas turbine will probably work, but you might not develop a whole lot of power with it.
__________________  | |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM. | | |
