Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Current > OFF-Topic / Misc.

OFF-Topic / Misc. A place to go to discuss things totally unrelated to this site

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2008, 08:15 PM   #46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Prescott Arizona USA
Posts: 507
I'm American ...And really did not get into the Civil War alot until just some time ago ..We learned about it in school and all (i'm 43)...Was always much more into WW2.. So I really did some looking around on WW2..( Not that I'm even in same league on WW2 as most of you here)... But I was always thinking that the Civil War was mostly about slavery... ..

Once I did some looking it was not... .. So they most of been teaching us the BS in the Dark Ages when I was in school also...
Haztoys is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 08:35 PM   #47
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
I don't think it's that ridiculous Njaco, the reason being that it's true. Why else bomb the major cities when it was well known that the factories weren't located there ? Hitting the population has its own crippling effect.
Was Hitler's motives different? With London, Amsterdamn, Warsaw, St. Petersburg, etc. for example?
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 03:04 AM   #48
Senior Member
 
Marcel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 4,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
Was Hitler's motives different? With London, Amsterdamn, Warsaw, St. Petersburg, etc. for example?
Being Dutch and having lived there, I must correct you and say it was Rotterdam, not Amsterdam that was bombed ... ...Sorry Chris, I just had to.
__________________

"To attack 36 aircraft on your own was rather much" - Jan Linzel, D.XXI pilot.
Marcel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 08:38 AM   #49
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 34,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcel View Post
Being Dutch and having lived there, I must correct you and say it was Rotterdam, not Amsterdam that was bombed ... ...Sorry Chris, I just had to.
No problem, I was just naming off cities in allied countries.

I find it rather wiered that people always bring up the fact of the allied bombing, but fail to realize that Hitler was bombing civilian cities first.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 08:59 AM   #50
Senior Member
 
ToughOmbre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
I find it rather wiered that people always bring up the fact of the allied bombing, but fail to realize that Hitler was bombing civilian cities first.
All the way back to the Spanish Civil War. The Condor Legion bombed Guernica in 1937.

And the Japanese were dropping bombs on civilian population centers (Manila, Nanking to name a few) long before the first American bombs fell on the land of Nippon.

Payback is a bitch!

TO
__________________


“Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind."
ToughOmbre is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 09:22 AM   #51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: niagara falls
Posts: 5,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToughOmbre View Post
All the way back to the Spanish Civil War. The Condor Legion bombed Guernica in 1937.

And the Japanese were dropping bombs on civilian population centers (Manila, Nanking to name a few) long before the first American bombs fell on the land of Nippon.

Payback is a bitch!

TO
go further cack to WW1 and the Zeppelins Gothas
pbfoot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 12:48 PM   #52
Senior Member
 
Marcel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 4,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
I find it rather wiered that people always bring up the fact of the allied bombing, but fail to realize that Hitler was bombing civilian cities first.
Agreed, but I think it's due to the fact that the allies were so much better at it. Also Hitlers bombing doesn't make good the mistakes made by bomber command and the USAAF. I think they were on a thin line using a strategy like that. This doesn't take away the fact that the NAZI's easily stepped over this line, though.
__________________

"To attack 36 aircraft on your own was rather much" - Jan Linzel, D.XXI pilot.
Marcel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2008, 01:29 PM   #53
Senior Member
 
freebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 2,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcel View Post
Agreed, but I think it's due to the fact that the allies were so much better at it. Also Hitlers bombing doesn't make good the mistakes made by bomber command and the USAAF. I think they were on a thin line using a strategy like that. This doesn't take away the fact that the NAZI's easily stepped over this line, though.
Good point Marcel, I think the Allied bombing of German cities is harder to defend because it had little military effect. I have always felt that too much production was taken up by bombers, I think it would have been better use if they had made more fighters, escorts, ground attack & maritime patrol.

But the heads of the British & American Air Forces were big on Strategic bombing....
__________________
freebird is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:09 AM   #54
Banned
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebird View Post
But that's one of the arguments that they use "But Stalin was as bad as Hitler"...
Considering the crimes he committed against his own countrymen, even the ones "liberated" in 44 & 45, he was probably worse than Hitler.
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 02:44 AM   #55
Senior Member
 
JugBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Campinas - SP
Posts: 1,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
Considering the crimes he committed against his own countrymen, even the ones "liberated" in 44 & 45, he was probably worse than Hitler.
stalin killed more than hitler, but mao tse tung killed even more. but sure, you have to pay ateption in the size of germany, size of soviet union and size of china.

i believe 1° mao tse tung, 2° hitler, 3° stalin these are the top 3 psychos !
__________________
JugBR is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 07:44 AM   #56
Senior Member
 
Marcel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dordrecht
Posts: 4,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugBR View Post
stalin killed more than hitler, but mao tse tung killed even more. but sure, you have to pay ateption in the size of germany, size of soviet union and size of china.

i believe 1° mao tse tung, 2° hitler, 3° stalin these are the top 3 psychos !

In no particular order. Also consider the time span in which they did it. I think Hitler was as bad as any of them.
__________________

"To attack 36 aircraft on your own was rather much" - Jan Linzel, D.XXI pilot.
Marcel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 04:38 PM   #57
Senior Member
 
Negative Creep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 847
Send a message via MSN to Negative Creep
I have read the book in question and it is actually a very interesting read. I haven't seen the programme but I can see where it's coming from. A lot of people see WW2 as if it were a 1950's movie - Brits and USA all good and virtuous, Germans all evil Nazis whereas soldiers from all sides committed war crimes. Of course the war crimes of Germany and Japan were on a far greater scale than anything the Western Allies ever performed, but as historians they have a right and duty to explore all aspects.

The topic title is just sensationalism really as they do have a legitimate point. That said, it's my view (one which I would imagine is held by most people on here) that deportations, internment and bombing were a necessary evil and that in total war, normal rules morals and rights just don't apply
__________________
"We attack tomorrow under cover of daylight"
"Daylight sir?"
"Yes it's the last thing they'll be expecting, a daylight charge over the minefield"
Negative Creep is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 05:04 PM   #58
Senior Member
 
freebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 2,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
Considering the crimes he committed against his own countrymen, even the ones "liberated" in 44 & 45, he was probably worse than Hitler.
Oh I think he was!

The point that I was making is that saying "Stalin was worse than Hitler" does not mean that "The Allies should not go to war with Germany"
__________________
freebird is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 08:28 AM   #59
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 3,820
Not sure if I agree with the idea that everyone committed atrocities as a common currency for all armies during WW2. Doing so is a step in the logic that the Allies were no better than the Axis. It is an arguement based more on inference than actual fact.

While Allied troops did commit atrocities (Dachau, Stutgart, ect), they were isolated cases and not part of official policy. There were no orders written and signed by Ike, Monty or any other Western Allied General instructing the troops to massacre civilians or captured soliders. There were no orders calling for "extreme measures" or similar such as those sent to the Wermacht during the Battle of the Bulge (which were largely ignored by the German troops but not entirely ignored).

However, the Nazis exterminated civilians as a matter of course. The Sodercommando (sp?) were a unit designed to do just that. The objective was not done as an aim of winning the war (possible considered an unfortunate side affect of battle) but as an action of genocide.

Compared to the war in the East, the war in the West was generally fought within the bounds of some rules of war. With exception of units such as the SS, there were generally limitations. However, the underlying conduct of the powers involved (Allied and Axis) was completely different. And it is here that the arguement that the Allies and Axis were the same completely breaks down.
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 09:18 AM   #60
Senior Member
 
Maestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Beaupré, Province of Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,529
Send a message via MSN to Maestro
I haven't read all of the tread, but here are my two cents...

Saying that the Allies are as bad as the Nazis is pure provocation. Of course there was war crimes commited on both sides, but ask yourself the questions :

Who started to bomb cities first ? Germans (First recorded bombing of a city in WWII being Wielun, Poland (September 1st 1939), destroying 75% of the city and killing close to 1,200 people.)
Who started to kill P.O.W.s first ? Germans (Invasion of Poland, September 1st - October 25th 1939.)

So you know, as someone stated earlier, payback is a bitch. They "accidently bombed" (yeah, sure... who can thrust a Nazi's word ?) a civilian area of London in 1940, the RAF replied by bombing Berlin and then they started to bomb London, Liverpool, Portsmouth and so on...

Then, a few years later, the RAF/USAAF wiped out Dresden... In my book, it was not a war crime, it was justice. A blind justice, but still justice.

And now some Neo-Nazi @ssholes in Germany wants the Queen to apologize for that bombing ? Are they f*cking retarded ? If I was the King of Great-Britain, I would never apologize... Even worse, I would call in the media and say something like : "So you want me to apologize for Dresden ? Sit on it, bitch ! (Give the finger to the camera.)" But once again, I've never hidden the fact that I'm a scumbag... Anyway, I'm getting off-topic here...

For the record : I'm glad the Queen has not apologized for Dresden.

So the Allies did some nasty things... Who cares ? It was greatly justified.
__________________
Maestro

http://www.yantremblay.com/
Maestro is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125