Shall we bring back the Lurverly Ladies Thread???

[Henk]

Well like les said, the whole thing about the 18 thing is because the censors guys might think it is not for people younger than 18, people can be @*&#$ up.

I must say if this will mean that the site will get into trouble because of this I will not be for it, but I do not see that someone of the censors will look at this type of thread as porn or only 18, dam TV has a lot of girls in minimum cloths in ads for anyone to seeand kids see woman in them everywhere.

To see a woman in a bikini and naked is two different things and to see it as adult content is bullsh*t. Just look at ww2incolor where there is such a thread and it is not censored, the pics is links, but still there has never been any porn on there. I found that site on a Google search



Henk

[MichaelHenley]

Possibly it could be a "filtered entry" thread:
You could only access it if you were a member (threfore not open to general public), and we make it mandatory to enter the date in the submission form, and from this, no-one can enter if they are under a preset age?
maybe...

[Tiger]

Originally Posted by MichaelHenley

Possibly it could be a "filtered entry" thread:
You could only access it if you were a member (threfore not open to general public), and we make it mandatory to enter the date in the submission form, and from this, no-one can enter if they are under a preset age?
maybe...

Or a user group? though that may make it seem more like some dodge strip joint! "Members only, no touching!"

[the lancaster kicks ass]

If you wanted to post pics of a girl you post it but it is not shown until it is approved by a mod first or a site administrator

You could only access it if you were a member (threfore not open to general public)

these both seem like good ideas to me, although i think having to give your age takes it a bit far......

[Maestro]

You say that because you would be too young to access the thread...

[cheddar cheese]

And also because of how easy it is to lie.

[the lancaster kicks ass]

and it would turn this site into too much of a ***** nanny state, one of the best things about the internet is that people need know nothing about you, i don't wanna start handing out details..............

[DerAdlerIstGelandet]

I like the making it a member only site and Les if it is brought back you know that at most of the times of the day atleast one of us is online to monitor it.

I however do agree with everything that Erich has said so I dont think I am for it or against it. It is something that we moderators need to discuss.

[lesofprimus]

Yup...

[Crippen]

Hey I have the perfect answer Les.... bring it back and I get vito to delete anything OTT or under age.

LOL couldn't resist that.

Though I find it a bit sad, boys will be boys,so why not bring it back...... but with firm rules.

cant believe I just said that....must be mellowing in my old age....bless me!

(Can I ban Sunny boy if he kicks off again though.... please,please, lol )

[mosquitoman]

Ahh, the original Lurverly Lady herself returns!
(that's my bit of a**e kissing for today )

[lesofprimus]

Lady and Gentlemen, the Moderators have discussed the issue of returning the thread, and we've come to the conclusion that its not necessary to do it...

Thanks for ur time and consideration in this matter....

Now go fu*k off.....

And hello Cripps......

[peterbruce2002]

okay fair enough, maybe it can be called the flirty females thread then?

just joking, sounds fair, think its silly we had one in the first place.

[lesofprimus]

I dont look at porn on the internet, so it kinda made sense to me somewhat, but I was the minority and rolled over....

Bottom line is that its not worth the hassle...

[Tiger]

So what you're saying is; all the other mods look at hardcore else where on the web so modding a "Lurverly Ladies Thread" would take time away from browsing hardcore stuff?

Never mind!