Shall we bring back the Lurverly Ladies Thread???

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

There seems to be alot of intrest in re-kindleing the Luverly Ladies Thread, and I opened this thread in response....

Things to keep in mind...

1. The reason we stopped the last thread.... (Porn instead of bikinis)
2. The new rules that would have to be implemented...
3. The penalties for breaking said rules would involve banning.... Is it worth it???

Post ur thoughts....

(My opinion? Bring it back, but with very specific allowances...)
 
Yes, I agree with you on the rules les. NO PORN. I am game for opening it again.

Banning people who does not apply with this is the best way of dealing with them.

I think it is worth opening if the members know what is the rules and that they would be banned if they do not apply.

Henk
 
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The only "lovely ladies" I would consider are the ones that were painted on the side of a warbird. If it isnt that, leave this site for airplanes!!!!!!
 
Loads of other stuff is discussed here, music, cars, politics etc. So there should be no reason not to have a "lovely ladies" thread. I'm for it! You should also put down a definition of what is acceptable and what is not e.g what bit of the ladies can't be exposed.
 
Im not too bothered but personally im against it - some goons will always break the rules and it will end up the same as the other ones. More trouble than its worth.
 
cheddar cheese said:
Im not too bothered but personally im against it - some goons will always break the rules and it will end up the same as the other ones. More trouble than its worth.
With all the respect I have for you and the other mods, amongst other, your job is to keep those goons/meatballs in no chance of doing this. A n00b breaks the LL rules, he's dismissed. Fair enough.
 
9 to 2 with me. Is funny how easy the word "porn" arrive everytime that some body talk about the woman body, it seems that some members have unsolved issues.

Off course I agree that no "sunning" ( and you know what I mean) should be allowed
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back