Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Who made the best Subs in WW2

OFF-Topic / Misc. Discuss Who made the best Subs in WW2 in the Current forums; The Type 21 was the best sub of the war beyond question. However if you take that out of the ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Current > OFF-Topic / Misc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-13-2006, 12:57 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,829
The Type 21 was the best sub of the war beyond question.

However if you take that out of the equation and ask which was the best then my vote would go to the American Fleet submarines. These were modern boats with radar and all other mod cons, an excellent range and were quite fast with a heavy warload.

The type VII had the sole advantage of being able to go very deep but if picked up on the surface as most were then this was of little benefit. It wasn't for nothing that they were called black coffins. The Type IX was a better all round boat but its equipment was similar to the VII.

The US boats had a better all round advantage.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 05:10 AM   #32
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 29,856
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider
The Type 21 was the best sub of the war beyond question.

However if you take that out of the equation and ask which was the best then my vote would go to the American Fleet submarines. These were modern boats with radar and all other mod cons, an excellent range and were quite fast with a heavy warload.

The type VII had the sole advantage of being able to go very deep but if picked up on the surface as most were then this was of little benefit. It wasn't for nothing that they were called black coffins. The Type IX was a better all round boat but its equipment was similar to the VII.

The US boats had a better all round advantage.
I will agree with that, but with what the Type VII was lacking they made up for in the Wolfpack tactics, atleast in the beginning.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 12:16 PM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,829
There is no doubt that the use of the Wolfpack tactics was an excellent plan A, the problem was that the germans didn't have a plan B. Once the allied forces had the equipment to deal with the Wolfpack, the germans were always on the defensive and never caught up.
There is no reason why they couldn't have developed the type XXI a couple of years earlier and then we would have been in real trouble.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2006, 01:29 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,528
If I am allowed to put my money on something, I would still choose Type VIIb in early stage, Gato in the middle stage and XXI or XXIII for the late stage.
But the most advanced submarine wasnīt Type XXI, this title doubtless belongs to Type XXVII true air independent Walter subs with very high submerged speed (25-27kts) and decent range.
I only have to confirm the worries about german torpedoes for the early (NOT INITIALLY) stage of ww2, particularly for the year 1940 and for electric torpedoes with magnetic pistols. The original steam driven ones were much better and reliable (1939-1940). Japanese submarine torpedoes are average, the vaunted long lance wasnīt used on subs.
British submarine torpedoes were average but reliable.
Italian submarine torpedoes were highly unreliable.
US torpedoes share a lot with german ones, they developed to a higher degree in reliability. Later in the war, both navies fielded very advanced torpedoes (partly with passive homing). US and british submarines also had more sophisticated torpedo calculators on board, german ones had more sophisticated sonar and from mid 1942 on quite advanced passive radar detectors. The dive depth is a vital point. The deepest recovered dive of ww2 was accidently a Type VIIC41 in the Mediterranean, diving to approx. 352m (1.165 ft), hitting the seabed and damaging the boat heavily. Itīs close to a wonder that the boat sustained the stress and returned to surface.
__________________
---delcyros---
delcyros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91