ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
Page 1 of 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 552

Best Aircraft in many different roles

Old Threads Discuss Best Aircraft in many different roles in the Old Stuff forums; The idea , E.g i think the 110 is the best aircraft in different roles because it was a good ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member Yeomanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    317

    Best Aircraft in many different roles

    The idea , E.g i think the 110 is the best aircraft in different roles because it was a good fighter/bomber and a good night fighter ect ect ...

    you get the idea ?


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Yeah, best multi-role plane was the Lockheed P-38 Lightning by far. The Ju-88 was the most widely used but not really very good at it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Hot Space's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bournemouth, UK
    Posts
    2,169
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Noooooooooooooooooooooooo, has to be a Mossie

    Hot Space

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    253
    Mossie ranks right up there, so does P-47, fighter, bomber, and the old warhorse P-40 jack of all trades, but the Germans were the masters of multi-role aircraft.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Yeomanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    317
    I agree Pope , the Ju-88 had tons of roles like CC stated , though i wouldnt paticualy imagine it as a Night fighter

  6. #6
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    but it was used as a night fighter, best was the mossie though.............

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  7. #7
    Senior Member Yeomanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass
    but it was used as a night fighter, best was the mossie though.............
    i know it was i was just saying i didnt thnk i Ju-88 was a good idea for nighgtfighter

  8. #8
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    well no it wasn't that good................

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  9. #9
    Senior Member Yeomanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    317
    I dont no much about it , but i'd say it would be a tad to heavy

  10. #10
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    and generally to big................

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  11. #11
    JCS
    JCS is offline
    Senior Member JCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Nicholson, PA
    Posts
    672
    Country
    United States
    Anything I've seen said the Ju88 was a pretty good NF...

    The Ju 88 night-fighter was a refined and formidable aircraft, with a powerful armament, excellent agility and advanced electronic sensors. It is therefore appropriate that Ju 88 night-fighters destroyed more Allied night bombers in WW2 than all other fighters combined.

  12. #12
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    now that's interesting as the Bf-110 was the most widely used german Nf.................

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by Yeomanz
    I dont no much about it , but i'd say it would be a tad to heavy
    If anything the Mossie would have been too heavy; the P-38 was best because it could carry a similar payload, only slightly less range, a MUCH better fighter, extremely accurate at ground attack, potentially superb NF (If it had seem more service) Excellent at recce, and it was extremely tough. It was also known that Dick Bong could get his P-38 to turn INSIDE Zero's, which says a lot about the manoeverability.

  14. #14
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    how can you be sure the zero was turning it's tightest?? anything could outmanouver a zero at 250+mph.................

    it could carry a similar payload, only slightly less range
    it had a good range if it had no ordinance, the P-38L's range with 3,200lbs was 450 miles..................

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Yeah but thats on internal fuel, its nearer 900 with Droptanks.

    Dick Bong encountered Zero's on many occasions, and on the accounts I read its been said that he could regularly turn inside them.

Page 1 of 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86