Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Old Stuff > Old Threads

Old Threads A place where old inactive threads wait for new life...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2004, 11:41 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Yeah...Spam-up!
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-25-2004, 11:46 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,171
Yep, I'll have Spam & Pickle instead

Hot Space
Hot Space is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-25-2004, 11:17 PM   #18
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese
RG, I prefer the A-20 to the A-26, but both were good
Why would you prefer the A-20 to the A-26? The A-26 is the next generation A-20. Kinda like prefering the Wildcat to the Hellcat.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 10:38 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Just personal preference
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 12:28 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
Quote:
B-29 and B-17 where the best
i agree with the B-29 part but the B-24 was better than the B-17 an is always forgotten.........

i'm still interested in hearing peoples arguments for the B-17...............
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 12:54 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Calgary CYYC
Posts: 16
Best...

My vote is for the Douglas A-26 Invader which had the performance of a fighter and could actually outrun a P-51 It survived WW II to serve in Korea and Veitnam and if you count it... Central America with certain Govt. (Never happened or existed) agencies.

The Invader is an awsome aircraft and contiunes to serve in the capacity of Air Attack Tanker, although sadly they're now being slowly phased out due to aging and parts shortages. (sigh)
__________________
It's not how far you fall... It's how high you bounce...
Capt. Scott Tailwheel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 01:22 PM   #22
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass
Quote:
B-29 and B-17 where the best
i agree with the B-29 part but the B-24 was better than the B-17 an is always forgotten.........

i'm still interested in hearing peoples arguments for the B-17...............
B-24 carried a little bigger payload a little further a little faster. But the B-17 was much more resiliant and able to survive much more damage, and had a little better gun arraingement.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 02:43 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Yeomanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 317
I say the He-111 H6 , its quite fast for a bomber and can carry 2 SC2000's , plus i love the plane as well
__________________
Yeomanz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 02:56 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Ive noticed a theme with your choices
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 04:11 PM   #25
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeomanz
I say the He-111 H6 , its quite fast for a bomber and can carry 2 SC2000's , plus i love the plane as well
But the B-29 was quite a bit faster and could carry up to 10 2000 lbs bombs. Kinda looks more like a giant He111 than B-17 too don't ya think?

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 04:14 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
The He-111 was IMO the best looking bomber of the war The B-29 was very nice too though
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 04:59 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Yeomanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese
The He-111 was IMO the best looking bomber of the war The B-29 was very nice too though
Yep , I just live the way it looks ,

Lunatic , I see your point , but H6 was made earlier than the 29 , 2 SC2000 is bout 4000bl's , and the b-29 has 4 engines , and the He111 is pretty
__________________
Yeomanz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 05:11 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,171
I was pretty once, but I'll won't go there for the moment

Hot Space
Hot Space is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-26-2004, 06:23 PM   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Calgary CYYC
Posts: 16
[img] Sorry Invader, still the best light, medium, or heavy.[/img]
Attached Images
File Type: jpg invader.jpg (40.1 KB, 651 views)
__________________
It's not how far you fall... It's how high you bounce...
Capt. Scott Tailwheel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 11-27-2004, 02:59 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
Quote:
B-24 carried a little bigger payload a little further a little faster. But the B-17 was much more resiliant and able to survive much more damage, and had a little better gun arraingement.
the B-24 could take just as much damage as the B-17 and the gun arangement meant very little as even the up to 13MGs of the B-17 still offered little protection from fighters, the B-24 was the better bomber............
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125