Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Old Stuff > Old Threads

Old Threads A place where old inactive threads wait for new life...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2004, 02:24 AM   #76
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
What wasn't slaughtered early on in Europe? Unescorted daylight raids were a mess. The B-17s and B-24s were slaughtered, and they certainly deserved all the praise they received. The B-26 was loved by its crews and offered considerably better performance than the B-25. The B-25 was certainly more versatile but most of its missions were ATTACK missions. The B-26 was the premier medium bomber of WWII.
__________________
Lightning Guy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-16-2004, 07:50 AM   #77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 584
Well, personally, I feel the Wellington deserves that honour...they made 47,409 sorties in Bomber Command, including 6,000 odd by OTU's, and dropped nearly 42,000 tons of bombs. In all, the Command lost 1,332 on Ops plus a further 337 in accidents. On Ops from the UK, they flew 63,976 sorties, totalling 346,440 hrs of flying. In the MTO and Far East, flying hours totalled 524,769, and they dropped nearly 100,000 tons of bombs. After the War, they continued to fly as trainers for 350,000 odd hrs...They built a total of about 11,500 of them, first designed in 1936, blooded in combat 4th Sept. 1939, the 2nd day of the War and was still in production on VE Day...It was designed by Barnes Wallis, famous for it's remarkably durable geodetic construction, took a 4,000 lb 'cookie' and was pleasant to fly, altho' slow at 180- 250 mph odd, but with 2,500 miles range and was loved by it's crews...

Apart from that , RAF 75[NZ] Sqn. was the first to have them, and a chap called F/S J.A. Ward from my l'il old hometown won the Victoria Cross after climbing-out on a wing and putting a fire out, in July 1941, heading back from a raid on Munster...I went to the same college, and they had his medal there....
Gemhorse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-16-2004, 12:33 PM   #78
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
I agree with Gemhorse here actually, I think the "Wimpy" was the best medium bomber.
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-16-2004, 02:24 PM   #79
Senior Member
 
The Jug Rules!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hattiesburg,Ms
Posts: 194
Personally, I think the Ju-88 deserves some credit. How many bombers medium bombers do you know operated in just about every role imaginable for aircraft?
__________________
The Spits got nothing on this...

The Jug Rules! is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-16-2004, 04:26 PM   #80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Good Point.
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-16-2004, 05:45 PM   #81
Senior Member
 
wmaxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,175
The JU-88 deserves to be in there too.
wmaxt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 12:18 AM   #82
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
Maybe the Ju-88 should receive honorable mention, but it clearly was not the best bomber of the war.
__________________
Lightning Guy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 08:49 AM   #83
Senior Member
 
NightHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Gaza Strip
Posts: 326
Send a message via MSN to NightHawk
The B-17 flying fortress gets my vote, with the fire power thet thing could carry. and the beating those plans could take...........
b-17 gets my vote.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bf109-7_702.jpg (77.0 KB, 540 views)
NightHawk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 12:02 PM   #84
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Persolly I like the He-111. It had a large payload for a twin engined plane and was fairly fast. The maximum ceiling was its only real problem.
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 12:04 PM   #85
Senior Member
 
Adolf Galland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 105
Send a message via AIM to Adolf Galland
yes it will wanto bet? b-17's MAJOR parts blown away and still flys back 2 base, itz not just possible, it HAD BEEN done many times be4(esitimated about 500 B-17s)
Adolf Galland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 12:12 PM   #86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: WSM, England
Posts: 20,387
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
What you on about? The B-17 was as tough as old boots...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 03:12 PM   #87
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
Quote:
The B-17 flying fortress gets my vote, with the fire power thet thing could carry
but that still didn't protect it from fighters..................

and if you think the lanc wouldn't be able to make it back on one engine, you'd be wrong
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mk.ii_flying_on_1_engine.jpg (92.4 KB, 519 views)
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 03:49 PM   #88
Senior Member
 
Nonskimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,871
Send a message via MSN to Nonskimmer
The Lanc was every bit the flying freight train! Good pic, btw.
Nonskimmer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 03:54 PM   #89
Senior Member
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,945
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
Quote:
The Lanc was every bit the flying freight train!
how dare you, freight trains are big fat and ugly brutes, the lancaster was a true lady..............
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 12-17-2004, 04:07 PM   #90
Senior Member
 
Nonskimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,871
Send a message via MSN to Nonskimmer
Okay then, she was a flying freight train.
Nonskimmer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118