 | Best naval fighter| Old Threads Discuss Best naval fighter in the Old Stuff forums; Naval fighters are something of a breed apart from their totally land-based cousins of the world's air forces. ... |
|
12-20-2003, 10:28 PM
|
#1 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 39
| Best naval fighter Naval fighters are something of a breed apart from their totally land-based cousins of the world's air forces. WW2 saw the first use of large scale carrier operations, as well as the debut of carrier vs. carrier battles. Of the many types to see service with the navies of the war, which was best? My pick is the rugged, versatile, and supremely deadly Chance-Vought F4U Corsair, which the Japanese pilots nicknamed "Whistling Death" after both the sound it made and what so very often happened to them when they mixed it up with the Corsair. |
| |
12-21-2003, 01:34 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: UK
Posts: 3,548
Country: | Best Navel fighter Here. Here .Corpcasselbury I think you hit the nail on the head picking the F4U Corsair, tough,manouverable, fast, and with good hitting power.
The only drawback was the poor visability available for landing on a carrier flight deck. This was overcome however by approaching the flightdeck from the stern quarter rather than the standard head on approach then turning to line up with the arrestor at the last moment , a skilled manouver but it saved pranging the aircraft as had occured numorous times before the introduction of this type of approach.
It was used by the Royal Navy as well as the United States Navy and much of it's development as a carrier based plane was a collaberation between these two services.
After the not very successful SeaFire (a variation of the Spitfire) the Corsair proved itself a popular craft with the Fleet Air Arm. |
| |
12-21-2003, 06:07 AM
|
#3 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | good choise obviously there's little debate here, and I'm only 13, who am i to dissagree.  the corsair runs away with the title, with the japanese zero, coming a not very close second |
| |
12-21-2003, 07:02 PM
|
#4 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 39
| Re: good choise Quote: |
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass obviously there's little debate here, and I'm only 13, who am i to dissagree.  the corsair runs away with the title, with the japanese zero, coming a not very close second | But the Grumman F6F Hellcat was in most areas far superior to the Mitsubishi Zero. |
| |
12-22-2003, 02:32 AM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 699
| I'm gonna have to agree here. The F4U Corsair beats out all contenders.
After that, corp hit the nail on the head again with F6F Hellcat.
BUT.....
If it had gone into service during the war, the Vought XF5U Flying Pancake might have taken the title. I'd like to thank the Lancaster kicks ass for bringing it to my attention
S!
Crazee |
| |
12-23-2003, 12:19 PM
|
#6 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | thanks well you know, don't like to brag an all........... \  / |
| |
12-24-2003, 10:13 AM
|
#7 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 39
| A word does have to be said for the Grumman F4F Wildcat. While not exactly the greatest fighter ever to fly off a carrier deck, it did hold the line against the Japanese for the first year of the Pacific War until newer and better replacements could make it out into the fleet and USMC. Many pilots blessed this plane because of the incredible amount of punishment it could absorb and still come home. This led to Grumman being nicknamed the "Grumman Iron Works". Comments? |
| |
01-16-2004, 01:15 PM
|
#8 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | sorry, i don't know a great deal about the war in the pacific  |
| |
01-16-2004, 03:46 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 699
| Likewise. However, I know some about the Wildcat's history, and I agree with corpcasselbury. It held out very well until the newer replacements got there. As for "Grumman Iron Works", I'd say they were right. But I don't have much room to talk, as they were the ones flying, not me.
__________________ |
| |
01-16-2004, 04:38 PM
|
#10 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 27
| neither do I |
| |
01-25-2004, 08:31 AM
|
#11 | | Facetious Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Northampton/Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 2,144
Country: | Corsair
Although I would of said the Hawker Sea Fury, but that came just a little late
Hot Space |
| |
01-25-2004, 12:00 PM
|
#12 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | we're focusing on the war in the pacific, don't forget the seafire and sea hurricane |
| |
01-25-2004, 01:05 PM
|
#13 | | Facetious Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Northampton/Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 2,144
Country: | The Sea Hurricane was a bit slow and the Seafire's Undercart was too weak
Hot Space |
| |
01-26-2004, 12:45 PM
|
#14 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | yea, but they worked |
| |
01-26-2004, 01:09 PM
|
#15 | | Facetious Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Northampton/Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 2,144
Country: | True, but they were Designed as Land Planes.
Hot Space |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM. |  | |