 | Paradoxes (Things That Contradict Themselves) Of WWII| Old Threads Discuss Paradoxes (Things That Contradict Themselves) Of WWII in the Old Stuff forums; I go with B-29 and how it had largest bomb load and takeoff weight of the war YET it ... |
|
02-12-2004, 11:23 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| Paradoxes (Things That Contradict Themselves) Of WWII I go with B-29 and how it had largest bomb load and takeoff weight of the war YET it was too fast for many jap fighters with a top speed of 370mph so it contradicts itself in being big heavy and a bomber and yet its faster than fighters |
| |
02-13-2004, 11:06 AM
|
#2 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | the lanc had a bigger bomb load 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-13-2004, 12:34 PM
|
#3 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | i wouldn't say that was contradictory, as it was very heavy, it's just that it was fast to
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-13-2004, 11:30 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| yes big heavy daunting yet faster than fighters cuz when u think bomber u think slow and b29 had 20k bomb load and lanc had like 18k and yes i know about grand slam but those were specially modifeid |
| |
02-14-2004, 01:49 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 699
| Military intelligence.
Seriously, though, I agree with Germans, though. A bomber like that that's monstrously heavy, and yet can go faster than the fighters trying to bring it down would seem to be a paradox
__________________ |
| |
02-14-2004, 01:51 PM
|
#6 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | well, it didn't see that much enemy fighter action really when you think about it
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-14-2004, 02:49 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| cuz it flew too high and was too fast now can someone else state a paradox |
| |
02-15-2004, 05:32 AM
|
#8 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | the vickers wellington was called the wellington, but it didn't look like one, what's up with that?
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-15-2004, 12:14 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 699
| The Lancaster. It doesn't look at all like Lancaster. I mean, really
__________________ |
| |
02-15-2004, 01:25 PM
|
#10 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | yeah, but that's different...........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-16-2004, 10:02 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| those arent paradoxes the nuke is it killed many and yet it saved even more |
| |
02-21-2004, 01:27 PM
|
#12 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | good point (just don't say that to the millions they killed)
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
02-23-2004, 03:40 PM
|
#13 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | how can you say it to someone if they're dead  and i expect a smart arse answer from you here 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
02-23-2004, 04:50 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 661
|
__________________ |
| |
02-23-2004, 04:57 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 661
| I've just looked up some info on the B-29 apparently its top speed was 358mph...now its a fact that the Zero could reach 332 (not far off 35  - plus try to remember 358mph was the absolute maximum..with a bomber being shot at and damaged not to mention normal stress on the engine - no aircraft can maintain maximum speed for too long BUT the big BUT here is that the Mitsubishi Raiden codenamed 'Jack' by the allies could reach 365mph which explains my previous point about the bombers heavy weapons....fighters could and did catch the B-29 and they did get shot down by japanese fighters sometimes 
__________________ |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM. |  | |