ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 184

Paradoxes (Things That Contradict Themselves) Of WWII

Old Threads Discuss Paradoxes (Things That Contradict Themselves) Of WWII in the Old Stuff forums; I go with B-29 and how it had largest bomb load and takeoff weight of the war YET it was ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member GermansRGeniuses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,037

    Paradoxes (Things That Contradict Themselves) Of WWII

    I go with B-29 and how it had largest bomb load and takeoff weight of the war YET it was too fast for many jap fighters with a top speed of 370mph so it contradicts itself in being big heavy and a bomber and yet its faster than fighters


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    the lanc had a bigger bomb load

  3. #3
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    i wouldn't say that was contradictory, as it was very heavy, it's just that it was fast to

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  4. #4
    Senior Member GermansRGeniuses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,037
    yes big heavy daunting yet faster than fighters cuz when u think bomber u think slow and b29 had 20k bomb load and lanc had like 18k and yes i know about grand slam but those were specially modifeid

  5. #5
    Senior Member Crazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    699
    Military intelligence.



    Seriously, though, I agree with Germans, though. A bomber like that that's monstrously heavy, and yet can go faster than the fighters trying to bring it down would seem to be a paradox

  6. #6
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    well, it didn't see that much enemy fighter action really when you think about it

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  7. #7
    Senior Member GermansRGeniuses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,037
    cuz it flew too high and was too fast now can someone else state a paradox

  8. #8
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    the vickers wellington was called the wellington, but it didn't look like one, what's up with that?

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  9. #9
    Senior Member Crazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    699
    The Lancaster. It doesn't look at all like Lancaster. I mean, really

  10. #10
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    yeah, but that's different...........

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  11. #11
    Senior Member GermansRGeniuses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,037
    those arent paradoxes the nuke is it killed many and yet it saved even more

  12. #12
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    good point (just don't say that to the millions they killed)

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    how can you say it to someone if they're dead and i expect a smart arse answer from you here

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    661
    It was called a B-29 'Superfortress' for a reason, it was covered in guns! I don't think a bomber that big could 'outrun' any japanese fighters....this is really gonna sound silly but whats the point in covering a bomber in machine guns if there isn't a plane fast enough to catch it?

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    661
    I've just looked up some info on the B-29 apparently its top speed was 358mph...now its a fact that the Zero could reach 332 (not far off 35 - plus try to remember 358mph was the absolute maximum..with a bomber being shot at and damaged not to mention normal stress on the engine - no aircraft can maintain maximum speed for too long BUT the big BUT here is that the Mitsubishi Raiden codenamed 'Jack' by the allies could reach 365mph which explains my previous point about the bombers heavy weapons....fighters could and did catch the B-29 and they did get shot down by japanese fighters sometimes

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86