 | What was the worst Aircraft of WWII?| Old Threads Discuss What was the worst Aircraft of WWII? in the Old Stuff forums; The Manchester, Komet, and Battle were several of the worst, as you guys said. I'll try to think of ... |
|
01-26-2004, 03:50 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 699
| The Manchester, Komet, and Battle were several of the worst, as you guys said. I'll try to think of more.
Suprising, isn't it? The best bomber of the war came from the failed Manchester?
__________________ |
| |
01-26-2004, 03:56 PM
|
#17 | | Facetious Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Northampton/Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 2,144
Country: | Do you know Crazy, that's the 1st time I've heard an American say that the Lancaster was the best bomber of the war
Cool
Hot Space |
| |
01-27-2004, 11:01 AM
|
#18 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 80
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Anonymous the whirlwind kicked ass!!!!!!!!! but the engines sucked ass i mean if it had twin merlins it could go 422mph but nooooo (we cant spare merlins for best twin engine fighter but we can spare merlins for crappy two seater fulmar fighter) | Hmmm, actually they decided that due to the massive power difference between the Peregrine and Merlin engines the Whirlwind's airframe would need considerable redesign for it to be strong enough to use Merlins. I agree it would have been nice to see though - I always thought the same about the P-38...
My vote for worst aircraft of the war goes to the Vultee Vengeance - so crap that... well, just CRAP! (I forgot the "amazingly crap" reason there - sorry.)
And Crazy a lot of good aircraft started out as mediocre, or worse, projects - look at the P-51 and Ki-100 (strapping a radial engine onto the indifferent Ki-61)  |
| |
01-27-2004, 11:32 AM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 699
| Good point Hucke,
And HS, the B-17 ties the Lanc in the best bomber category 
__________________ |
| |
01-27-2004, 01:38 PM
|
#20 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | still think it's the battle...... |
| |
01-27-2004, 02:09 PM
|
#21 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 80
| heh, but the Vengeance never even made it into combat it was so bad - The RAF received a load, flew one, and concluded immediately that they were totally useless in Europe and the pacific. At least they saw fit to give the Battle a shot...  |
| |
01-28-2004, 12:56 PM
|
#22 | | Facetious Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Northampton/Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 2,144
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Crazy Good point Hucke,
And HS, the B-17 ties the Lanc in the best bomber category  | The Lanc will win...........it's got Merlins
Hot Space |
| |
01-28-2004, 01:53 PM
|
#23 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | lanc. easily, i mean, it could actually carry more than a matchstick, unlike the b-17 |
| |
01-28-2004, 04:41 PM
|
#24 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | seems to me like the lanc. has resorted to extreme exaggeration  but it seems to me like this crazy guy knows his stuff, and if he says its as good as a lancaster then i believe him
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
01-29-2004, 08:01 AM
|
#25 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | thanks.. |
| |
01-29-2004, 09:13 AM
|
#26 | | Facetious Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Northampton/Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 2,144
Country: | Could a B-17 carry this:
A 12,000lb Tallboy
Hot Space |
| |
01-29-2004, 09:40 AM
|
#27 | | Facetious Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Northampton/Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 2,144
Country: | ............or this 22,000lb "Grand Slam" Bomb:
Hot Space |
| |
01-30-2004, 08:59 AM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Slough
Posts: 113
Country: | Don't forget the Fairey Baracuda , which had to be one of the worst war planes ever .
Andrew
1st Post  |
| |
01-30-2004, 09:22 AM
|
#29 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 56
| the brewster buffalo what a pile of crap
as for the defiant if they'd have put some guns on the front it could have been half desceent a bit like an il-2 
__________________ |
| |
01-30-2004, 01:39 PM
|
#30 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | hey, the IL-2 was a good plane............................. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM. |  | |