ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Extra fuel tanks for medium bombers?

Other Mechanical Systems Tech. Discuss Extra fuel tanks for medium bombers? in the Technical forums; Just wondering... Could medium bombers (Mitchell, Wellington, Baltimore etc) fly beyond normal range with aux fuel tanks in the bomb ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member freebird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    2,628
    Country
    Canada
    Country II
    United Kingdom

    Extra fuel tanks for medium bombers?

    Just wondering...

    Could medium bombers (Mitchell, Wellington, Baltimore etc) fly beyond normal range with aux fuel tanks in the bomb bay?
    For example for ferrying long distances.



    Was this ever done?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    454
    Country
    Germany
    In short: Yes. Common practice in all nations to use bomb bay for aux tanks for special missions or ferry.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    49
    Country
    United States
    A friend of mine told me that the early model B-25's ordered by the Dutch lacked the normal internal fuel capacity, resulting in airplanes so short-ranged that they were all but useless as bombers. Adding fuel tanks in the bomb bay would have elminated the bomb carrying capability. His unit, the 9th Photo Recon in India, obtained one of the ex-Dutch B-25's for use as a transportation hack and to deliver the photos from their F-4 Lightnings to units who needed them.

    Of course the early F-4's the unit had suffered from the same problem. They originally were equippd with small drop tanks set close to the wing, which not only limited their fuel carrying capability but also increased the drag and inteferred with the ability to jettison the tanks safely. The 9th modified their airplanes with longer drop tank pylons. The much larger 160 gal and 300 gal P-38 drop tanks on the long pylons were a huge improvement.

    And of course the F-105 pretty much eliminated the use of the bomb bay for bombs and put a fuel tank in there. Given that a 105 with no external or bomb bay tanks had a subsonic endurance of 0.5 hours they needed the bomb bay tank.

  4. #4
    Senior Member freebird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    2,628
    Country
    Canada
    Country II
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by MIflyer View Post
    A friend of mine told me that the early model B-25's ordered by the Dutch lacked the normal internal fuel capacity, resulting in airplanes so short-ranged that they were all but useless as bombers. Adding fuel tanks in the bomb bay would have elminated the bomb carrying capability. His unit, the 9th Photo Recon in India, obtained one of the ex-Dutch B-25's for use as a transportation hack and to deliver the photos from their F-4 Lightnings to units who needed them.
    Could the bombers use drop tanks as well?

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    49
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by freebird View Post
    Could the bombers use drop tanks as well?
    That's a good question. I do not recall seeing or hearing any use of drop tanks by U.S. heavy or medium bombers. The exception is the USN's P2V Ventura, which used P-38 drop tanks. Now, the Mosquito used them quite commonly and I do not recall ever hearing of that airplane's bomb bay being used for fuel tanks; they even put passengers in the bomb bay, but I don't think there were any fuel tanks.

    I do not recall seeing drop tanks on other British bombers.

    The U.S. is a much larger country than those in Western Europe - it is said you could put all of Western Europe into Texas - and we seem to have placed much more emphasis on long range in our aircraft. Even the P-36 and P-40 had more range than the Spitfire and BF-109, and the Mustang Mk 1 had even more range than the P-40, even without drop tanks. A short ranged medium or heavy bomber would probably seem absurd to the U.S., but apparently not to the Dutch.

    I think a book on the development and use of drop tanks would be a good one; maybe I will write it!

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    454
    Country
    Germany
    Strange to hear this from dutch B-25, no tanks above the bomb bay installed ?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    506
    Country
    United States
    Hello MIFlyer,

    As for Short Ranged US fighters, check out the P-39.

    I believe the B-26 Marauder had two bomb bays and often used the aft one to carry additional fuel while the front carried bombs.

    - Ivan.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. British Bombers and Transport aircrafts
    By gekho in forum Aircraft Pictures
    Replies: 142
    Last Post: Today, 08:23 AM
  2. This Day in the Battle of Britain
    By Njaco in forum WW2 General
    Replies: 466
    Last Post: 07-07-2012, 09:00 PM
  3. WHAT IF: Longer range P-47 from start
    By gjs238 in forum Aviation
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 11-28-2011, 05:11 AM
  4. The 9th FS Unit History... Nov 1944 - Sept 1945....
    By lesofprimus in forum Stories
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 06:06 PM
  5. Best Aircraft in many different roles
    By Yeomanz in forum Old Threads
    Replies: 551
    Last Post: 01-21-2005, 09:29 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86