 | If Foreigners Could Vote in '08| Politics Discuss If Foreigners Could Vote in '08 in the Current forums; Originally Posted by ToughOmbre
I can't comment on the political awareness of the voters of other countries, but I ... |
|
04-16-2008, 01:16 AM
|
#46 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,231
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by ToughOmbre I can't comment on the political awareness of the voters of other countries, but I can say that the average American voter leaves a lot to be desired.
IMHO not enough vote issues or philosophy (i. e., secular progressive liberal vs traditional conservative).
TO | You got that right TO. Quote:
Originally Posted by renrich by the way, according to Wiki, in 1780, Parliament was elected by less than 3% of the people. I would hesitate to call that a democracy.. | According to my estimate about 97% of the people are not capable of making an intelligent vote....
I think the ballots should be changed to essay question format instead of multiple choice! 
__________________ |
| |
04-17-2008, 05:00 AM
|
#47 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Nelspruit, Mpumalanga
Posts: 266
Country: | |
| |
04-17-2008, 09:43 AM
|
#48 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,231
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie_brunette | You got that right, the African Union is a joke, they didn't even mention Zimbabwe at their meeting....
__________________ |
| |
04-19-2008, 10:44 AM
|
#49 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 175
Country: | It is interesting to note that those foreigners who seem to favor Obama or Clinton come from countries where the government is expected to look after the populace and run the economy. But what makes the USA different is the tradition of letting the private sector control the economy and look after social issues. If a Democrat is elected, I would expect them to look abroad for solutions to American issues, instead of looking to the American people for inspiration. In other words, following instead of leading.
I'm for McCain, if for nor other reason than to piss of the socialists among the American electorate and abroad.
tom
__________________ The problem with neighborhoods these days is not enough neighbors and too many hoods. |
| |
04-19-2008, 01:22 PM
|
#50 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,231
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by machine shop tom It is interesting to note that those foreigners who seem to favor Obama or Clinton come from countries where the government is expected to look after the populace and run the economy. But what makes the USA different is the tradition of letting the private sector control the economy and look after social issues. If a Democrat is elected, I would expect them to look abroad for solutions to American issues, instead of looking to the American people for inspiration. In other words, following instead of leading.
I'm for McCain, if for nor other reason than to piss of the socialists among the American electorate and abroad.
tom | probably true Tom, but of course the President can't set economic policy, that has to start in congress.
The main duties for the next president will be foreign & military policy
__________________ |
| |
04-24-2008, 07:46 AM
|
#51 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,051
Country: | I would like to quickly point out that of the three 'leading' parties of Great Britain - the Liberal Democrats are the farthest left, not labour.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
04-24-2008, 06:10 PM
|
#52 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 1,879
Country: | Tony Blair was a member of the labour party but he was a patriot, saw what he felt was in the best interests of his country to do regarding Iraq and did it ignoring the political consequences. There is an article in the latest "Forbes" magazine by a British historian and author, Paul Johnson, about Bush and I heartily reccomend everyone read it, if possible. |
| |
04-28-2008, 10:34 AM
|
#53 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Munich
Posts: 218
Country: | Oh, come on. Someone like Blair would never ignore political consequences, if he knew them. He just made the wrong decision. I'm not very familiar with UK politics, but as far as I understood the media then, he ignored his people's will. And when all went wrong - and maybe even if it had not - he had to go.
Krabat
__________________ "The way they wrap themselves in the flag and pretend to be the inheritors of a grand democratic tradition. While they're really alchemists, turning public trust into gold." ("Civil Disobedience", Joe Haldeman) |
| |
04-28-2008, 07:45 PM
|
#54 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,231
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Krabat42 I'm not very familiar with UK politics, but as far as I understood the media then, he ignored his people's will.
Krabat | Both the Conservatives and Blair's Labour (most of them) voted to support Bush in Iraq. Blair certainly saw the political consequences during the next 4 years after the invasion but he didn't back down.
__________________ |
| |
04-29-2008, 02:06 AM
|
#55 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: UK
Posts: 3,420
Country: | The general rule of thumb in the UK is if you have money you vote conservative if you are working class you vote labour.
The conservative voter is generally a reliable voter so turns out everytime where as the Labour voters tend to be far more fickle and often fails to use their ballot.
As for the Liberals they lost most of their support when the labour party was originally formed and never really recovered.
If I was voting in the USA I would probably go for Obama,
1. Im a labour voter and 2. IMHO I feel that the role of a nations leader requires a rare talent and the chances of either a relitive or spouse having that same rare ability is very remote and its a case of riding the waves of their predecessors to get the vote. |
| |
04-29-2008, 02:18 AM
|
#56 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Munich
Posts: 218
Country: | I think this means, the politicians said "Go" and the people on the streets said "No". He went with the politicians (in fact, they never go for themselves) and that cost him. Yes, that's how I remember. Did you read "Adrian Mole and the weapons of mass destruction."? I know it's fiction, but still a good account of the time.
Krabat
__________________ "The way they wrap themselves in the flag and pretend to be the inheritors of a grand democratic tradition. While they're really alchemists, turning public trust into gold." ("Civil Disobedience", Joe Haldeman) |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM. |  | |