ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.

View Poll Results: Which was the best 1942-era dive bomber?

Voters
28. You may not vote on this poll
  • Aichi D3A Val

    0 0%
  • Douglas SBD Dauntless

    12 42.86%
  • Junkers Ju 87 Stuka

    11 39.29%
  • Ilyushin IL-2 Sturmovik

    3 10.71%
  • Blackburn Skua

    2 7.14%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 54
Like Tree2Likes

Which was the best 1942-era dive bomber?

Polls Discuss Which was the best 1942-era dive bomber? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Which 1942-era dive bomber was the best? It does not matter how much each bomber was produced, but how effective ...

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    27
    Country
    United States

    Which was the best 1942-era dive bomber?

    Which 1942-era dive bomber was the best? It does not matter how much each bomber was produced, but how effective it was in dive bombing, defending itself,ect.
    Some aircraft were not included due to not meeting the 1942-era criteria such as the SB2C Helldiver and He 50.


  2. #2
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    Ju-87D

    Can carry a wide variety of weapons
    .....Bomb(s) up to 1,800 kg in size.
    .....Torpedoes and special bombs designed for skip bombing against maritime targets.
    .....Cluster bombs.
    .....Two underwing cannon up to 3.7cm in size.
    Outstanding accuracy for all of the above weapons.
    Good armor protection against ground fire.
    Sturdy wide track landing gear and short runway capability allow it to operate from almost any clearing in addition to proper airfields and CV deck.
    Fixed landing gear may look old fashioned but the Ju-87 was as fast as a SBD and probably quite a few other small dive bombers.
    Relatively cheap to mass produce.

    Ju-88A, Me-210C and Pe-2 were operational during 1942. These large dive bombers probably belong in a separate category. Larger, faster and longer range then small dive bombers such as the Ju-87 and SBD.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,373
    Country
    Canada
    Hs-123?

    Since were missing it and I have a fondness for the Hs I'd say the Stuka That Siren and the shear effect it has on people
    must at least rank the Stuka at 1st. When you think dive bomber you always get the image of the Bob Stuka in action in the movie hehe.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Thorlifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dallas, Tx
    Posts
    6,851
    Country
    United States
    I'll go with the Dauntless. Better defensive armament, heavier payload, much better range. If it's the siren that you like (and I do too), just strap a Jericho Trumpet on the wing of the SBD.

  5. #5
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    Dauntless. heavier payload


    During 1942 SBDs typically carried a 1,000 lb bomb. During 1942 the Ju-87D typically carried 1,000 kg.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    627
    Country
    Germany
    1942 Stuka and SBD have nearly identical defensive armament. Stuka has better payload, SBD better range.

  7. #7
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    Stuka has better payload, SBD better range

    An accurate summary.

    Unlike the SBD, the Ju-87D had a big brother. Ju-87s were tasked with short range dive bomber missions. Ju-88As were tasked with long range dive bomber missions. The two Junkers dive bombers complimented each other. SBD did not have a complimentary large dive bomber so it had to be a jack of all trades (and master of nothing). However IMO the SBD was a reasonably good compromise between bomb load and range.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,896
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    An accurate summary.
    Unlike the SBD, the Ju-87D had a big brother. Ju-87s were tasked with short range dive bomber missions. Ju-88As were tasked with long range dive bomber missions.
    Yes,The Ju 87 was designed for use somewhat like long range artillery in support of the Army so its relatively limited range was not an issue. It didn't have to fly over vast expanses of the Pacific Ocean !

    I voted for it anyway.

    Steve

  9. #9
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    fly over vast expanses of the Pacific Ocean !

    What was the longest range SBD strike mission when carrying a 1,000 lb bomb? I think it was less then 200 miles.

  10. #10
    Senior Member oldcrowcv63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northeast North Carolina
    Posts
    1,344
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    United States
    IIRC, the 1,000 pound payload max range was about 225 statute miles while the 500 lb. armed-search profile was about 300 sm.
    None of us is as smart as all of us...

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,896
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    What was the longest range SBD strike mission when carrying a 1,000 lb bomb? I think it was less then 200 miles.
    I'll rephrase that....operate in the vast expanses of the Pacific Ocean

    If I'd known that the Dauntless had less than double the range of the Ju 87 then I'd have voted for the "Stuka" twice!

    Steve

  12. #12
    Senior Member oldcrowcv63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northeast North Carolina
    Posts
    1,344
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by stona View Post
    I'll rephrase that....operate in the vast expanses of the Pacific Ocean

    If I'd known that the Dauntless had less than double the range of the Ju 87 then I'd have voted for the "Stuka" twice!

    Steve
    Looks to me like the range was about double that of the Stuka. The values I quoted above were for CV Based operations. That typically allows a 20% fuel margin, so the effective range is more like ~270 smi. for a max-range, land-based combat mission with a full load. Previous quote regarding the battle of Cape Esperance was incorrect, doing further research.

    I have no idea what the land based combat mission range of the Stuka was but wikipedia ranges compare as:

    SBD-5: 1,115 statute miles
    Stuka: 311 statute miles

    The SBD-3 had a longer range than the -5. Max Payload for the SBD-5 was 2,250 lbs., for the SBD-3 was 1,200 lbs. Wiki claims Stuka-JU-87-B2 payload was just under 1,200 lbs. Of course these maximum payloads do not correspond to their max range.

    Based on this simplistic comparison I'd guess the SBD's range was at least twice that of the Stuka.
    Last edited by oldcrowcv63; 08-15-2012 at 12:31 PM.
    None of us is as smart as all of us...

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    500
    Real comparison to SBD is imho a Ju 87D with 1x1000 kg bomb and 2x300 liter droptank... B version Stukas had less fuel and bomb capacity, and not really a good comparison for 1942 when they were about to be phased out.

    Ju 87D-1 had 1500 km range with 1000 kg bomb and 2x300 liter droptank. Pretty much the same as SBD-5 on long range mission.
    Last edited by Tante Ju; 08-15-2012 at 04:21 PM.

  14. #14
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    Starting to doubt SBD range advantage

    800 liters. Ju-87D internal fuel.
    …..Can carry two 300 liter drop tanks in addition to 1,000 kg bomb on centerline.
    …..Flight duration of 4 hours when carrying two drop tanks.

    960 liters. SBD internal fuel.

    Did the SBD have a range advantage over the Ju-87D? I'm starting to doubt it.

  15. #15
    Senior Member oldcrowcv63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northeast North Carolina
    Posts
    1,344
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    United States
    According to wikipedia (the easiest albeit questionable on-line source available to me at present), during the Naval Battle of Guadacanal, SBDs from Enterprise attacked transports at a distance of over 230 miles. No indication of the load out however. There is a lot of conflicting range quotes cited for the SBD on the web. Wikipedia is as above but other sites quote 770 miles. My guess is that this latter lower range value most probably represents a round trip distance covered by an unarmed scouting mission.
    None of us is as smart as all of us...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 500
    Last Post: 08-06-2012, 08:42 PM
  2. The Best Bomber of WWII: #4
    By syscom3 in forum Aviation
    Replies: 1135
    Last Post: 10-04-2011, 06:44 PM
  3. Replies: 139
    Last Post: 01-26-2010, 02:55 PM
  4. ...searching for the best USAAF interceptor...
    By delcyros in forum Aviation
    Replies: 131
    Last Post: 04-02-2007, 11:51 AM
  5. The Best Bf - 109 Variant ?
    By lesofprimus in forum Old Threads
    Replies: 522
    Last Post: 07-12-2005, 11:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86