ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.

View Poll Results: Best Air Force 1943-1945

Voters
53. You may not vote on this poll
  • United States Army Air Force

    39 73.58%
  • Royal Air Force

    7 13.21%
  • Luftwaffe

    4 7.55%
  • Imperial Japanese Air Force

    1 1.89%
  • VVS (Soviet Air Force)

    0 0%
  • Other

    2 3.77%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 132
Like Tree3Likes

Best Air Force 1943-1945

Polls Discuss Best Air Force 1943-1945 in the World War II - Aviation forums; What was the best Air Force from the period of 1943 to 1945?...

  1. #1
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,285
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany

    Best Air Force 1943-1945

    What was the best Air Force from the period of 1943 to 1945?

    Last edited by DerAdlerIstGelandet; 04-26-2011 at 12:37 PM.


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  2. #2
    Creator of Interesting Threads tomo pauk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,482
    Country
    Croatia
    Fighters - Allied forces have better prop planes for the period, but LW introduces jets.
    SE bombers - IL-10 is the bird here.
    TE bombers - Axis forces lose badly here, RAF has Mossie (with Bristol offering good ones), USAAF receives A-26, Russians get the Tu-2.
    4-engined bombers - USAAF has the best bird here. Along with nuke.
    Transport - USAAF has the lead.
    MP - USAAF (Consolidated's planes) - but here we have USN to interfere?
    Numbers - USAAF.
    Manpower - USAAF.
    Radars - RAF & USAAF.

    The winner is clear.

  3. #3
    Senior Member parsifal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    6,402
    Country
    Australia
    my opinion, the USAAf is clearly ascendant. LW is in a full nose dive, RAF now subordinated to the US, japan is also in a nosedive. VVS has some really good equipment, but the aircrews still are not quite up to standard
    Fr President Clemenceau’s speech to the AIF 7th July 1918: “ we expected a great deal of (Australians)… We knew that you would fight a real fight, but we did not know that from the beginning you would astonish the whole continent. I shall go back and say to my countrymen “I have seen the Australians, I have looked in their faces …I know that they will fight alongside of us again until the cause for which we are all fighting is safe for us and for our children”.




  4. #4
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,285
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany
    I agree with you completely by this point. By this point the USAAF was the most formidable air force in the world. Combination of equipment, quality, pilots and training as well its world wide projection make it the finest in the world by this point. The Luftwaffe was on a serious decline by 1944. Still had top notch aircraft but either not in the quanitities needed or lack of fuel and trained pilots. The end was obvious by this point.


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  5. #5
    Senior Member renrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montrose, Colorado
    Posts
    4,534
    Country
    United States
    Yep, by January, 1944, the USAAF had to be rated as the most powerful in the world with the RAF next and the LW hanging in there but struggling. As a tactical air force, the VVS was effective.

  6. #6
    Member Saetta66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Napoli, Italia
    Posts
    71
    Country
    Italy
    Among the Others there was a bunch of unbeatable losers called Aeronautica nazionale Repubblicana (northern Italy) e Aeronautica Cobelligerante (Southern Italy) who tried to keep on doing their duty even if everything was lost ...

  7. #7
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,285
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany
    Quote Originally Posted by Saetta66 View Post
    Among the Others there was a bunch of unbeatable losers called Aeronautica nazionale Repubblicana (northern Italy) e Aeronautica Cobelligerante (Southern Italy) who tried to keep on doing their duty even if everything was lost ...
    Certainly commendable, but in your opinion what sets it apart from the other air forces?


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  8. #8
    Senior Member pbfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    niagara falls
    Posts
    7,635
    Country
    Canada
    one has no choice but to place the USAAF overall first particularly in numbers and in certain equipment like long range intercepters,B29, transport, logistics and industrial might however I quibble about quality of aircrew . I cannot figure out how aircrew were superior in the USAAF over Commonwealth crew most , from what I've read most USAAF aircrew were not as capable in a bad weather enviroment as their flight training for the most part took place in areas not kmown for inclement weather. The USAAF was also well behind in nightfighting and intruding
    I also ask if you wanted a precision mission performed which would you prefer the Commonwealth or USAAF.

  9. #9
    Senior Member buffnut453's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Virginia, US of A
    Posts
    1,390
    Country
    United Kingdom
    I'd also point out that the B-29 only entered operational service halfway through the period in question and it probably took some time to build up sufficient numbers for it to be a viable force. Until that time, the Lanc (IMHO) ruled the roost as the best long-range heavy bomber. Perhaps things aren't so cut and dried in favour of the USAAF?

  10. #10
    Senior Member parsifal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    6,402
    Country
    Australia
    B-29s were not really effective until very late in 1944, when tthey began flying low, at night and using incendiary packages that had been developed earlier by the brits in their offensive over Germany. High level HE armed raids just couldnt deliver enough tonnage of bombs to destroy Japanese cities. For some reason the US had determined that the japanese population had to be targetted as wel as point targets like factories

    Converting to low level incendiary raids added the fuel load of the cities themselves to the fuel load, and hugely increased the leathality of the b-29....and then came THE bomb, of course
    Fr President Clemenceau’s speech to the AIF 7th July 1918: “ we expected a great deal of (Australians)… We knew that you would fight a real fight, but we did not know that from the beginning you would astonish the whole continent. I shall go back and say to my countrymen “I have seen the Australians, I have looked in their faces …I know that they will fight alongside of us again until the cause for which we are all fighting is safe for us and for our children”.




  11. #11
    Pacific Historian syscom3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    12,112
    While the USAAF was not #1 in everything, it was at the top in most. And even where it was lacking, it was still good enough to be near the top.

    The USAAF had the resources to build what it wanted, in any quantity, and piloted and maintained by competent crews.

    The RAF never had that capability. A very fine organization. But putting out a few great aircraft types manned by a limited number of superb crews, doesn't hold up to the shear industrial and organizational powers the US had at its disposal.
    "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

  12. #12
    Senior Member parsifal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    6,402
    Country
    Australia
    A good summary Sys, and correct of course
    Fr President Clemenceau’s speech to the AIF 7th July 1918: “ we expected a great deal of (Australians)… We knew that you would fight a real fight, but we did not know that from the beginning you would astonish the whole continent. I shall go back and say to my countrymen “I have seen the Australians, I have looked in their faces …I know that they will fight alongside of us again until the cause for which we are all fighting is safe for us and for our children”.




  13. #13
    Senior Member pbfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    niagara falls
    Posts
    7,635
    Country
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by syscom3 View Post
    While the USAAF was not #1 in everything, it was at the top in most. And even where it was lacking, it was still good enough to be near the top.

    The USAAF had the resources to build what it wanted, in any quantity, and piloted and maintained by competent crews.

    The RAF never had that capability. A very fine organization. But putting out a few great aircraft types manned by a limited number of superb crews, doesn't hold up to the shear industrial and organizational powers the US had at its disposal.
    I disagree with the comment of limited competent crews there was never a shortage of crews in fact it was the reverse . I also would like to mention how much of a jump start the USAAF was given when in Dec 41 when approx 5000 trained aircrew transferred from RCAF to USAAF. I say RCAF rather then RAF as only approx 250 Americans were in the RAF and near 10000 were in RCAF even though many Americans servedd with RAF Squadrons they were RCAF and remained so as the pay was much better

  14. #14
    Member Saetta66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Napoli, Italia
    Posts
    71
    Country
    Italy
    It sets apart form the other air forces simply because the ratio aircrafts/number of ennemies was so high that the percentage of comin back safe was probaly almost zero. That's it . The German and the Jap aviations have got this gap only in the last months or weeks of war ....

  15. #15
    Senior Member buffnut453's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Virginia, US of A
    Posts
    1,390
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by syscom3 View Post
    While the USAAF was not #1 in everything, it was at the top in most. And even where it was lacking, it was still good enough to be near the top.

    The USAAF had the resources to build what it wanted, in any quantity, and piloted and maintained by competent crews.

    The RAF never had that capability. A very fine organization. But putting out a few great aircraft types manned by a limited number of superb crews, doesn't hold up to the shear industrial and organizational powers the US had at its disposal.
    Syscom,

    I think we need to be a bit careful here. Whilst the US undoubtedly had amazing manufacturing capacity, it did not have unlimited resources although I fully accept that its full resources were never reached. The comment about Brit limitations must also be placed in context - the RAF was, after all, over 1,100,000 men in uniform in 1944.

    Despite the large scale of the USAAF, there were still some things it didn't do very well, particularly during the early stages of the period in question - integrated air defence, night fighting, massed shipping strikes, precision night bombing (although I accept this was as much doctrinal as technical as the USAAF wanted to persist with daylight attacks), support to resistance operations etc.

    I guess it depends on how you define "best". If it's the biggest, then the USAAF easily wins, although again I think that's more the case towards the end of the period rather than in the 1943-early 1944 timeframe.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Finland Air Force
    By gekho in forum Aircraft Pictures
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 05-11-2013, 09:57 AM
  2. Italy v. England - Air to air
    By DAVIDICUS in forum Aviation
    Replies: 197
    Last Post: 04-30-2011, 03:59 PM
  3. Best WWII Air-Force
    By Desert Fox in forum Polls
    Replies: 890
    Last Post: 04-01-2011, 08:01 AM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-30-2009, 06:04 AM
  5. Best Aircraft in many different roles
    By Yeomanz in forum Old Threads
    Replies: 551
    Last Post: 01-21-2005, 09:29 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86