 |
12-08-2004, 04:18 AM
|
#46 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 82
| Who's gonna stop me from voting 100 times for it???!! |
| |
12-08-2004, 07:49 AM
|
#47 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Patras
Posts: 154
| This plane really looks good! Any pics of it johnny?
Which country are these circles? |
| |
12-08-2004, 11:37 AM
|
#48 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Lancaster, UK
Posts: 283
| They're an alternative style of RAF roundel. No other country was silly enogh to deploy the Defiant! :P
__________________ 'Oh...never mind. I see you're radiating an aura of extreme incompetence.' |
| |
12-08-2004, 12:46 PM
|
#49 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | Quote: |
Can I vote as many times as I want?
| i've been warned that if i "spam vote" i could get kicked off the site, and there's an art to spam voting, it aint easy.............
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
12-08-2004, 01:56 PM
|
#50 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | If someone would PM me (or another Mod) saying how you spam vote I (we) would be most grateful.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
12-08-2004, 04:06 PM
|
#51 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Patras
Posts: 154
| It seems that only with a second acount you can spam vote. And I checked many accounts with 0 posts... But I can't see any reason doing this. (If the defiant get more votes we 'll know who have done this) |
| |
12-08-2004, 05:25 PM
|
#52 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Stockport
Posts: 162
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by BombTaxi They're an alternative style of RAF roundel. No other country was silly enogh to deploy the Defiant! :P | Apart from the USAAF.
The RAF lent the 8th USAAF Airforce a couple of Defiants as Target-Tugs when they arrived in Britain 
__________________ If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!! |
| |
12-08-2004, 05:28 PM
|
#53 | | He who does not skim
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,957
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by redcoat The RAF lent the 8th USAAF Airforce a couple of Defiants as Target-Tugs when they arrived in Britain  | So it finally found a good use, then?  |
| |
12-08-2004, 06:41 PM
|
#54 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Patras
Posts: 154
| Now I want to change my vote... |
| |
12-09-2004, 01:29 AM
|
#55 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 82
| Spam vote!! Me !! Never would.Rebel there r plenty in the gallery.Got mine there .And your all bloody nasty people saying things like that about my Defiants.They were very good night-fighters , terrible day time fighters and good target tugs.( hated saying that last part). |
| |
12-09-2004, 11:09 AM
|
#56 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | I like the Defiant! They had some success as dayfighters until the Germans realised they had turrets 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
12-10-2004, 12:03 AM
|
#57 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,256
Country: | Spitfires ruled in the early versions as well and were faster and more maneovurable than the Bf-109. Indeed the only thing the Bf-109 could do better was dive. Therefore I would say the Spitfire as Spitfires outclassed in certain areas the Bf-109 and most other fighters right up until the end of WW2 and indeed survived into the 1960s-1970s in service whereas most of these other aircraft died before or at the end of WW2, figeratively speaking. |
| |
12-10-2004, 12:17 AM
|
#58 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 82
| I seem to recall the 264sqn hold the record for kills in 1 day.Think it was 35.not bad for for a turret fighter.Like u say though it didn't last long.If I have to choose a proper day time fighter in Bob it would be the Hurricane.There was more of them in the battle than spitfires and their kill ratio was higher.The spitfire was the glamour fighter and a better fighter than the hurri but the battle would not have been won without the hurricane. |
| |
12-11-2004, 02:16 PM
|
#59 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Stockport
Posts: 162
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by johnny .The spitfire was the glamour fighter and a better fighter than the hurri but the battle would not have been won without the hurricane. | correct 
__________________ If in doubt........Panic!!!!!!! |
| |
12-12-2004, 06:21 AM
|
#60 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | I agree on all points there, johnny 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM. |  | |