 |
10-20-2004, 01:08 PM
|
#16 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | if you mean the komet then yes it was, and it sucked anyway.............
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
10-20-2004, 02:24 PM
|
#17 | | "Shooter"
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,263
Country: | The Komet was an Me-163, not 193.
__________________ http://www.vg-photo.com Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda. |
| |
10-20-2004, 02:58 PM
|
#18 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass Quote: |
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese Quote: |
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass i'm temped to go for the meteor because it's a great plane, but if i say it's the best i know i'll get proved wrong................ | Too damn right.
The Germans kinda got the whole jet thing sorted... | but after the war the meteor became one hell of a fighter, the first to break the 600mph in level flight mark and the backbone of the RAF's day and night fighting capibilities, you can't say it wasn't a good fighter, it just never really got a chance to prove itself in WWII.................
and the germans started their jet program earlier, we didn't really show much interest in the concept early in the war, it was only due to whittles tireless work that the meteor came into service when it did............... | I agree that the Meteor was formidable after the war, but that isnt during the war is it?
And who knows, the early versions of the Meteor might have been **** in combat. They probably wouldnt have been though.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
10-20-2004, 02:58 PM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Gaza Strip
Posts: 326
| yep. |
| |
10-22-2004, 02:14 PM
|
#20 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | what are you agreing to NH?? Quote: |
And who knows, the early versions of the Meteor might have been s**t in combat. They probably wouldnt have been though.
| but if it saw combat against the 262 you have to remember the 262 wasn't exactily the most manouverable plane was it?? and the meteor didn't have fuel and acceleration probelms on the same scale as the 262................
and if it's manouverable enough to take on a V-1 (which if your gonna tip with your wingtip needs a very agile plane) it can't have been that bad............... Quote: |
but that isnt during the war is it
| and it might have been, it never got a chance to prove itself in combat though so alas, we'll never know................
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
10-22-2004, 02:16 PM
|
#21 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| IT WASN'T ALLOWED TO PROVE ITSELF IN COMBAT!
It couldn't even fly over Germany until the war was over! |
| |
10-22-2004, 02:21 PM
|
#22 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | at the end of the war meteor F.IIIs were based in belgium and germany and carried out ground strafing missions, so it did overfly germany...........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
10-22-2004, 02:48 PM
|
#23 | | Hairy one of Old Judea
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Deepest Darkest NZ
Posts: 1,143
Country: | Actually He-162 was quite nifty too!
Kiwimac
__________________ |
| |
10-23-2004, 12:51 AM
|
#24 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Gaza Strip
Posts: 326
| the ardo 234 was a jet ? |
| |
10-23-2004, 10:24 AM
|
#25 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,789
Country: | yes the Ar 234 was a jet and one of the best a/c in the recon role
__________________ zerreißen Sie es oben ! |
| |
10-23-2004, 11:10 AM
|
#26 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Gaza Strip
Posts: 326
| ok. thanks, i saw 2 modles 1 with jet engines and 1 with props. |
| |
10-23-2004, 12:29 PM
|
#27 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | props?? are you sure this was the blitz??
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
10-23-2004, 01:17 PM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Gaza Strip
Posts: 326
| yeah i saw it on a search in google, cant remmber on what subject. |
| |
10-23-2004, 02:40 PM
|
#29 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | you sure it wasnt the Ar-232?
It probably wasnt a 234, NH.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
10-23-2004, 05:00 PM
|
#30 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 8,789
Country: | yes the Ar 234 was a jet with two underslung engines. First as a recon and then to a bomber. Limited success but quick, very few were brought down by Allied air action.
my friend and ace of the US 352nd fg Don Bryan described to me in full details of his 4 Arado encounters and on one of these missions he brought down one just beyond the Remagen bridge which it bombed
v/r
E ~
__________________ zerreißen Sie es oben ! |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM. |  | |