ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.

View Poll Results: Best Jet of WW2?

Voters
254. You may not vote on this poll
  • Me262

    152 59.84%
  • Gloster Meteor

    27 10.63%
  • Bell P-59 Aircomet

    7 2.76%
  • He162

    18 7.09%
  • Ar234

    28 11.02%
  • Me-163

    13 5.12%
  • Yokosuka Ohka

    6 2.36%
  • P-80

    3 1.18%
Closed Thread
Page 2 of 37 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 544

Best Jet of WW2?

Polls Discuss Best Jet of WW2? in the World War II - Aviation forums; woo im not alone on the arado...

  1. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    woo im not alone on the arado


  2. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    661
    You're just a fan of bombers really aren't you? When i first got into aircraft when i was about 8 or 9 years old my dad bought me a book about the Vickers Wellington (i was too young to appreciate any of the info on it but i loved the pictures) I was totally hooked after that - but i still have a big soft spot for good ol' 'Wimpy'

  3. #18
    Anonymous
    Guest
    I'm glad to see the American Aircomet only got one vote - it was a crap! and i DO know that I just put it there to keep the Americans sweet (we brits are good at that cos our prime minister is a coward )

  4. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    661
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    I'm glad to see the American Aircomet only got one vote - it was a crap! and i DO know that I just put it there to keep the Americans sweet (we brits are good at that cos our prime minister is a coward )
    That was me by the way, i forgot to log on (Doh! )

  5. #20
    Senior Member kiwimac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Deepest Darkest NZ
    Posts
    1,131
    Country
    New Zealand
    I note also the Campini-Caproni



    500 km/h is already passé; in a few years, it will be common to all planes. We are so sure of it that we are looking even further? (Italo Balbo, 1931).

    This declaration perfectly recaps the spirit which brought about, a few years later, the first Italian jet. Since 1931, Secondo Campini, an aeronautical engineer, had shown to the Ministry of Aeronautics his studies of a new kind of engine, which promised higher speed and greater elevation. In brief, the schema proposed called for the dynamic collection and compression of air, which, subsequently, would be further compressed by a mechanical device, heated and then expanded through a jet to generate thrust.

    In February 1934, the "Regia Aeronautica" stipulated a contract with Campini for the realization of two jet airplanes. For the construction of his machines, Campini contacted the firm "Aeroplani Caproni" of Taliedo, whose owner had been a believer in this new kind of propulsion since the beginning. The production of the first two prototypes began immediately, but was delayed mostly due to the unavailability of the aeronautical engines used to propel the compressor, and by increasing costs. The first prototype was not completed until 1940.

    These delays caused the German Henkel He.178V1 to become, on August 27, 1939, the first jet plane in the history of aeronautics. Campini-Caprini prototype number one called for a propulsion system capable of dynamically collecting and compressing air via the movement of the airplane itself. Subsequently, air was further compressed using a three-stage axial compressor mechanically operated by an internal combustion engine (Alfa Romeo Asso L.121 RC40 900Hps). Upon exiting the compressor, air was heated by external burners and then allowed to expand through a Bernoulli jet. This device was adjustable by means of a "never-ending screw" of the Pelton type; the total thrust was about 750 Kg.

    In reality, this propulsion system was still quite rudimental because the air was heated by a series of burners placed outside the jet. For better performance, these burners should have been placed inside the combustion chamber, thus allowing the air-gasoline mix to burn internally and not externally. Another substantial limitation was the fact that an auxiliary combustion engine actuated the three-stage compressor, and not, as usually found in similar engines, by a turbine directly connected and actuated by the exhaust gases. Naturally, this second choice would have caused substantial difficulties in terms of the proper material to be used by the turbine itself due to the extreme heat.

    The prototype which flew for the first time on August 27, 1940 was an elegant monoplane with two seats wholly constructed of metal with a low wing of elliptical shape. After a series of tests and demonstration flights, the first prototype was transferred in November 1941 from Milan to the "Centro Sperimentale" in Guidonia, near Rome.

    Test flights continued until 1942 when the plane was abandoned and later mined by the retreating Germans. The relic was examined by the British, sent to England and later scrapped. The second prototype, which left the assembly line in 1941 and had flown only once, survived the war and is currently preserved in excellent condition at the "Museo Storico dell?Aeronautica" in Vigna di Valle, just north of Rome.

    The Campini-Caproni jet plane was an aircraft of modest performance because of its excessive weight and the propulsion solution chosen. It never passed the prototypical stage but still represents a testimonial to a fascinating but unlucky technological gamble.

    Technical Data

    Type Macchi Mc.200

    Engine Alfa Romeo Asso L.121 RC40

    Total HP hp 900

    Wing span m 14.32

    Length m 12.88

    Height m 4.70

    Wing area m2 36.52

    Weight kg 3,460

    Max weight kg 4,409

    Max speed km/h 329 @ 3000 m without burners
    km/h 375 @ 3000 m with burners

    Range km. 3,520

    Armament none

    Crew 2

    Total build 2 (C.C. n°1 e n°2) + test shell
    Source: http://www.regiamarina.net/arsenals/...jet/jet_us.htm

    Kiwimac

  6. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    You're just a fan of bombers really aren't you? When i first got into aircraft when i was about 8 or 9 years old my dad bought me a book about the Vickers Wellington (i was too young to appreciate any of the info on it but i loved the pictures) I was totally hooked after that - but i still have a big soft spot for good ol' 'Wimpy'
    was that comment aimed at me?

  7. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    661
    Yep

  8. #23
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    i like the wimpy to, one of me faves

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  9. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    in that case, yes i do like bombers the most, theyre far more interesting than fighters etc yeah i like the "wimpy" as you call it too

  10. #25
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    yeah, lots of planes had funny nicnames, i'll tell you them on monday...........

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  11. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    WSM, England
    Posts
    20,367
    Country
    United Kingdom
    ok

  12. #27
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    what, no argument, how unlike you.....................

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

  13. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, California, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,695
    Country
    United States
    The P-80. Yes, it was a WWII jet. Some were even deployed to Italy before the end of the war.
    "Try to fly in the middle of the air. The edges can be recognized by water, ground, rocks, and interstellar space. It is much easier to not hit anything in the middle of the air than it is anywhere near the edges."

  14. #29
    Senior Member GermansRGeniuses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,037
    no not really it wasnt operational in time and why would they send them to italy if Ve-Day had happened already? y not japan? exactly

  15. #30
    Senior Member the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,986
    Country
    United Kingdom
    he's right, it didn't see servise in WWII......................

    "Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."

Closed Thread
Page 2 of 37 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86