 |
03-17-2005, 02:22 AM
|
#391 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2
| Best WWII jet You forgot the Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star, which qualifies as a WWII jet, since it did enter USAAF service just before the end of hostilities. The first squadron was in shipment to Europe, where it was expected to participate in the first jet vs jet combat with the ME 262, when Germany surrendered. Being too short ranged for use in the Pacific, the type did not see actual combat in WWII. Re-designated F-80, the Shooting Star did go on to see combat against MiGs in the early stages of the Korean war. Soon outclassed by newer fighter types, though, it served out the rest of that war in the ground attack role. I would say that the P-80 was hands down the best jet of WWII, since it was the last jet produced in that war and continued on into the next era of jet combat. |
| |
03-17-2005, 02:28 AM
|
#392 | | | Already been through this Jer.
There were two P-80's in Italy and two in Britain a month or two before VE day. There were about 50 of them by the end of June in the USA, and more rolling off the assembly lines. There is little doubt that had the War in Europe not been a done deal the P-80 would have been available even earlier, and that by the end of summer, late-fall by the latest, they'd have outnumbered the Me262 and all other German jets combine.
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
03-17-2005, 04:10 PM
|
#393 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,408
Country: | But how would it have stacked up against the Ho-229 and Ta-183? Both of which had a chance of seeing service, had the war gone on a bit longer.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
03-17-2005, 04:48 PM
|
#394 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,956
Country: | for god's sake the Ho-229 was too unstable too be any use!!
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
03-17-2005, 04:51 PM
|
#395 | | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese But how would it have stacked up against the Ho-229 and Ta-183? Both of which had a chance of seeing service, had the war gone on a bit longer. | The war would have had to go on a lot longer for either of those planes to see service. The Ho-229 was probably not a viable design. And just what engine was going to power the Ta-183?
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
03-18-2005, 03:57 AM
|
#396 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2
| I did not mean to sound like the only one who knew about the P-80 in WWII. It's just that I am brand new to this site and the page that asks you to vote for the best jet of WWII did not include the P-80 as an option. So I thought it was worth mentioning. Now I come to find out that most everyone on this site knows as much as I do about it. Forgive me for being presumptuous. |
| |
03-18-2005, 04:47 AM
|
#397 | | | Jer - I agree with you, it should be listed. But for whatever reason, it is not. It seems to me that if combat usage is the criteria for inclusion, the Meteor and Aircomet should not be on the list. If those jets fit the criteria, so should the P-80. And the Me163 and Ohka were rocket planes, not jets - so they clearly do not belong in this poll.
Since the P-80 is not in the list, I've not voted.
Sorry if you got "rough housed" m8, but if you look back through this topic you will see the P-80 has been throughly argued in this thread.
Welcome to the board!
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
03-18-2005, 04:57 AM
|
#398 | | Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
| The Meteor saw combat firing its guns in anger over the continent so I don't know why you want it excluded.
For sure, the Aircomet should not be on the list, and the Ohka and Me 163, as mentioned. |
| |
03-18-2005, 05:14 AM
|
#399 | | He who does not skim
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,955
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by jer I did not mean to sound like the only one who knew about the P-80 in WWII. It's just that I am brand new to this site and the page that asks you to vote for the best jet of WWII did not include the P-80 as an option. So I thought it was worth mentioning. Now I come to find out that most everyone on this site knows as much as I do about it. Forgive me for being presumptuous. | I agree with you that it should be included. It may not have actually seen combat before the war ended, but it was there.
Few people here are anything like experts. I'm certainly not, but I do take quite an interest in the subject and enjoy reading the information presented by the more learned members of this forum. Some pretty interesting debates occur regularly.
Welcome.  |
| |
03-18-2005, 12:13 PM
|
#400 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,408
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass for god's sake the Ho-229 was too unstable too be any use!! | Which completely contrasts everything else ive read...
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
03-18-2005, 12:49 PM
|
#401 | | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by KraziKanuK The Meteor saw combat firing its guns in anger over the continent so I don't know why you want it excluded.
For sure, the Aircomet should not be on the list, and the Ohka and Me 163, as mentioned. | I thought the only combat the Meteor saw was against V1's. ???
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
03-18-2005, 12:54 PM
|
#402 | | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese Quote: |
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass for god's sake the Ho-229 was too unstable too be any use!! | Which completely contrasts everything else ive read... | But there really is no reliable source to support those claims. Furthermore, in post war flyng wing designs, involving both German documents and samples and many of the German engineers involved in the Ho-229, it was found a flying wing was too unstable to work until fly-by-wire controlls were possible. Some of the designs did fly, but that did not make them suitable for combat use, there is every reason to believe the same holds true for the Ho-229. Testing never got very far, if it had it would surely have run into the same problems Northrop encountered.
=S=
Lunatic | |
| |
03-18-2005, 12:55 PM
|
#403 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,408
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by RG_Lunatic Quote: |
Originally Posted by KraziKanuK The Meteor saw combat firing its guns in anger over the continent so I don't know why you want it excluded.
For sure, the Aircomet should not be on the list, and the Ohka and Me 163, as mentioned. | I thought the only combat the Meteor saw was against V1's. ???
=S=
Lunatic |
Im pretty sure it did too. Nothing ive read says otherwise.
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
03-18-2005, 01:41 PM
|
#404 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,956
Country: | 616 Sqn was based in Belgium for a period in 1945 in which they say some action..........
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
03-18-2005, 01:48 PM
|
#405 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 2,995
Country: | They were the first Meteor equipped squadron
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM. |  | |