Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums
 



Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Polls

Polls Polls and discussion on their results.

View Poll Results: Best medium bomber, 1939?
Douglas B-18 0 0%
Martin B-12 series 0 0%
Lockheed Hudson 0 0%
Vickers Wellington 4 25.00%
Handley Page Hampton 0 0%
Ju 86 0 0%
He 111 5 31.25%
Do 17 1 6.25%
Fiat Br 20 0 0%
Ju 52/3m 0 0%
PZL P.37 1 6.25%
Caproni Ca 135 0 0%
Ju 88 5 31.25%
Mitsubishi G3M Nell 0 0%
Mitsubishi Ki-21 0 0%
Savoia Marchetti SM 79 0 0%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-28-2008, 02:05 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 277
Best medium bomber, 1939

Here's a poll to see if you're awake. If you vote, please tell why you chose it. And no, if I didn't include it, don't thrash me. Some of these bombers did not see service, or much. I will try to post all relevant types, but I know I'll forget some. We're talking about best in terms of most capable of doing their job and surviving. In some cases, we may not have much evidence to go on.
Oreo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:16 PM   #2
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
You did not make a poll for people to vote...

You love polls don't you?
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:35 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
You did not make a poll for people to vote...

You love polls don't you?
Sorry, Adler, I was making the poll but it was an open-book test and it took a while so there was a delay. I was trying to be super thorough, as no matter how careful I am something always seems to slip through the cracks. . . . .
Oreo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:40 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 3,446
Love the Ju88. Not only a great bomber, but a heavy fighter, night fighter, interdiction aircraft. You name it. Head and shoulders above the rest in versatility and general ability as an aircraft.
timshatz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:41 PM   #5
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
In the 1939 I will have to go with the Ju 88. At that time it was faster than a lot of its oposition, very maneuverable and a very versatile aircraft. It remained a very versatile and good aircraft for the remainder of the war.
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:48 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 277
And you will be interested to note, Adler, that I chose a Deutch kampf fleugzeug for my selection. The Do 17Z was, I think, the best medium bomber in squadron service in 1939. I struggled with putting the Ju 88 on as it was barely in service, but knew I'd catch it if I didn't include it. The Ju 86 was phasing out of service; if I included it, I would have to include the Ju 88. But I think the Do 17Z, which hit hard in Poland, was a sturdier bomber than the Ju 88's of the time. However, I think the Ju 88's overtook the Dornier designs shortly after that, until the advent of the 217.
Oreo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:52 PM   #7
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
I am not very fond of the flying pencil. Yeah it was good at the time, but it was overpassed very quickly and became very obsolete very quickly as well. The Ju 88 lived on and got better...
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:54 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 277
Well, you may all be right. Perhaps I was wrong. Can't change it now.
Oreo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:55 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 277
However, I anticipate seeing some Wellington fanatics before we're done. . . .
Oreo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 03:57 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 277
My choice of the Do 17 had to do with its abilities in 1939, not later, however I see your point, and really the Ju 88 probably had the edge even then. Some accounts I was reading thought the Do 17Z was the best bomber of the B.o.B. but then I can't even find that reference now I'm looking for it. I probably should have voted for something else.
Oreo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 05:45 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
kool kitty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,412
The LeO 451 was pretty good.

Also, how about the Do 215, or would that be counted under Do-17?

Last edited by kool kitty89; 07-28-2008 at 06:00 PM.
kool kitty89 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 06:01 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Thorlifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 4,345
I'm torn between 3. The Ju-88, the He-111, and the Wellington. So I'll go with...........uh.........um............The Ju-88 due to its versatility.
__________________
Thorlifter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 07:02 PM   #13
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
In 1939 the Ju 88 was still a much better aircraft. Better airframe, better performance...
__________________


fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I]
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 11:41 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by kool kitty89 View Post
The LeO 451 was pretty good.

Also, how about the Do 215, or would that be counted under Do-17?
Blast! I knew I was forgetting something-- the Frenchies! And, yes, the LeO was a good plane by all accounts. Not sure if it was in service in 1939 or started in 1940. Yes, a good plane. Very capable.
Oreo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2008, 12:01 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
parsifal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,994
Quick performance comparison of Ju88 and Wellington


Source Wiki

Wellington
General characteristics

Crew: six
Length: 64 ft 7 in (19.68 m)
Wingspan: 86 ft 2 in (26.26 m)
Height: 17 ft 6 in (5.33 m)
Wing area: 840 ft² (78.04 m²)
Empty weight: 18,556 lb (8,417 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 28,500 lb (12,927 kg)
Powerplant: 2× Bristol Pegasus Mk. XVIII radial engine, 1,050 hp (783 kW) each
Performance

Maximum speed: 235 mph (378 km/h)
Range: 1,805 miles (2,905 km)
Service ceiling 18,000 ft (5,486 m)
Rate of climb: 1,050 ft/min (320 m/min)
Wing loading: 34 lb/ft² (168 kg/m²)
Power/mass: 0.08 hp/lb (0.13 kW/kg)
Armament


Guns: 8x .303 Browning machine guns:
2 in nose turret
2 in tail turret[7]
2 in waist positions [8]
Bombs: 4,500 lb (2,041 kg) bombs

Ju 88 (Data for A-4)

Specifications Ju 88 A-4

General characteristics

Crew: 4
Length: 14.36 m (47 ft 2⅞ in)
Wingspan: 20.08 m (65.88 ft)
Height: 5.07 m (16.63 ft)
Wing area: 54.7 m² (587 ft²)
Loaded weight: 9,000 kg (20,000 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)
Powerplant: 2× Junkers Jumo 211J [33] liquid-cooled inverted V-12, 1,044 kW (1,420 PS, 1,401 hp) each
Performance

Maximum speed: 475 km/h (295 m) at 5,300 m (17,388 ft)
Range: 2,300 km (max internal fuel) (1,429 mi)
Service ceiling 8,500 m (26,900 ft)
Armament


Guns:

3-6 machine guns, either MG 15, MG 81, MG 81Z or MG 131 (some carried one MG FF cannon in the nose)[34]
Bombs: Max load 2,005kg (4,420 lb)

Ten 50kg (110 lb) bombs internally + four 250kg (551 lb) bombs externally.
Two 500kg (1,105 lb) externally.
Four 500kg (1,105lb) bombs externally.[
__________________
Do not judge on abilities, but on choices
parsifal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 PM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
Design by HTWoRKS


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118