ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.

View Poll Results: Best medium bomber, 1939?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Douglas B-18

    0 0%
  • Martin B-12 series

    0 0%
  • Lockheed Hudson

    0 0%
  • Vickers Wellington

    4 22.22%
  • Handley Page Hampton

    0 0%
  • Ju 86

    0 0%
  • He 111

    6 33.33%
  • Do 17

    1 5.56%
  • Fiat Br 20

    0 0%
  • Ju 52/3m

    0 0%
  • PZL P.37

    1 5.56%
  • Caproni Ca 135

    0 0%
  • Ju 88

    6 33.33%
  • Mitsubishi G3M Nell

    0 0%
  • Mitsubishi Ki-21

    0 0%
  • Savoia Marchetti SM 79

    0 0%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Best medium bomber, 1939

Polls Discuss Best medium bomber, 1939 in the World War II - Aviation forums; Here's a poll to see if you're awake. If you vote, please tell why you chose it. And no, if ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member Oreo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States

    Best medium bomber, 1939

    Here's a poll to see if you're awake. If you vote, please tell why you chose it. And no, if I didn't include it, don't thrash me. Some of these bombers did not see service, or much. I will try to post all relevant types, but I know I'll forget some. We're talking about best in terms of most capable of doing their job and surviving. In some cases, we may not have much evidence to go on.


  2. #2
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,306
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany
    You did not make a poll for people to vote...

    You love polls don't you?


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  3. #3
    Senior Member Oreo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
    You did not make a poll for people to vote...

    You love polls don't you?
    Sorry, Adler, I was making the poll but it was an open-book test and it took a while so there was a delay. I was trying to be super thorough, as no matter how careful I am something always seems to slip through the cracks. . . . .

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Phila, Pa
    Posts
    4,443
    Country
    United States
    Love the Ju88. Not only a great bomber, but a heavy fighter, night fighter, interdiction aircraft. You name it. Head and shoulders above the rest in versatility and general ability as an aircraft.

  5. #5
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,306
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany
    In the 1939 I will have to go with the Ju 88. At that time it was faster than a lot of its oposition, very maneuverable and a very versatile aircraft. It remained a very versatile and good aircraft for the remainder of the war.


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  6. #6
    Senior Member Oreo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States
    And you will be interested to note, Adler, that I chose a Deutch kampf fleugzeug for my selection. The Do 17Z was, I think, the best medium bomber in squadron service in 1939. I struggled with putting the Ju 88 on as it was barely in service, but knew I'd catch it if I didn't include it. The Ju 86 was phasing out of service; if I included it, I would have to include the Ju 88. But I think the Do 17Z, which hit hard in Poland, was a sturdier bomber than the Ju 88's of the time. However, I think the Ju 88's overtook the Dornier designs shortly after that, until the advent of the 217.

  7. #7
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,306
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany
    I am not very fond of the flying pencil. Yeah it was good at the time, but it was overpassed very quickly and became very obsolete very quickly as well. The Ju 88 lived on and got better...


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  8. #8
    Senior Member Oreo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States
    Well, you may all be right. Perhaps I was wrong. Can't change it now.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Oreo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States
    However, I anticipate seeing some Wellington fanatics before we're done. . . .

  10. #10
    Senior Member Oreo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States
    My choice of the Do 17 had to do with its abilities in 1939, not later, however I see your point, and really the Ju 88 probably had the edge even then. Some accounts I was reading thought the Do 17Z was the best bomber of the B.o.B. but then I can't even find that reference now I'm looking for it. I probably should have voted for something else.

  11. #11
    Senior Member kool kitty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,415
    Country
    United States
    The LeO 451 was pretty good.

    Also, how about the Do 215, or would that be counted under Do-17?
    Last edited by kool kitty89; 07-28-2008 at 05:00 PM.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Thorlifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dallas, Tx
    Posts
    6,851
    Country
    United States
    I'm torn between 3. The Ju-88, the He-111, and the Wellington. So I'll go with...........uh.........um............The Ju-88 due to its versatility.

  13. #13
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,306
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany
    In 1939 the Ju 88 was still a much better aircraft. Better airframe, better performance...


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  14. #14
    Senior Member Oreo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    393
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by kool kitty89 View Post
    The LeO 451 was pretty good.

    Also, how about the Do 215, or would that be counted under Do-17?
    Blast! I knew I was forgetting something-- the Frenchies! And, yes, the LeO was a good plane by all accounts. Not sure if it was in service in 1939 or started in 1940. Yes, a good plane. Very capable.

  15. #15
    Senior Member parsifal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    6,412
    Country
    Australia
    Quick performance comparison of Ju88 and Wellington


    Source Wiki

    Wellington
    General characteristics

    Crew: six
    Length: 64 ft 7 in (19.68 m)
    Wingspan: 86 ft 2 in (26.26 m)
    Height: 17 ft 6 in (5.33 m)
    Wing area: 840 ft² (78.04 m²)
    Empty weight: 18,556 lb (8,417 kg)
    Max takeoff weight: 28,500 lb (12,927 kg)
    Powerplant: 2× Bristol Pegasus Mk. XVIII radial engine, 1,050 hp (783 kW) each
    Performance

    Maximum speed: 235 mph (378 km/h)
    Range: 1,805 miles (2,905 km)
    Service ceiling 18,000 ft (5,486 m)
    Rate of climb: 1,050 ft/min (320 m/min)
    Wing loading: 34 lb/ft² (168 kg/m²)
    Power/mass: 0.08 hp/lb (0.13 kW/kg)
    Armament


    Guns: 8x .303 Browning machine guns:
    2 in nose turret
    2 in tail turret[7]
    2 in waist positions [8]
    Bombs: 4,500 lb (2,041 kg) bombs

    Ju 88 (Data for A-4)

    Specifications Ju 88 A-4

    General characteristics

    Crew: 4
    Length: 14.36 m (47 ft 2⅞ in)
    Wingspan: 20.08 m (65.88 ft)
    Height: 5.07 m (16.63 ft)
    Wing area: 54.7 m² (587 ft²)
    Loaded weight: 9,000 kg (20,000 lb)
    Max takeoff weight: 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)
    Powerplant: 2× Junkers Jumo 211J [33] liquid-cooled inverted V-12, 1,044 kW (1,420 PS, 1,401 hp) each
    Performance

    Maximum speed: 475 km/h (295 m) at 5,300 m (17,388 ft)
    Range: 2,300 km (max internal fuel) (1,429 mi)
    Service ceiling 8,500 m (26,900 ft)
    Armament


    Guns:

    3-6 machine guns, either MG 15, MG 81, MG 81Z or MG 131 (some carried one MG FF cannon in the nose)[34]
    Bombs: Max load 2,005kg (4,420 lb)

    Ten 50kg (110 lb) bombs internally + four 250kg (551 lb) bombs externally.
    Two 500kg (1,105 lb) externally.
    Four 500kg (1,105lb) bombs externally.[
    Fr President Clemenceau’s speech to the AIF 7th July 1918: “ we expected a great deal of (Australians)… We knew that you would fight a real fight, but we did not know that from the beginning you would astonish the whole continent. I shall go back and say to my countrymen “I have seen the Australians, I have looked in their faces …I know that they will fight alongside of us again until the cause for which we are all fighting is safe for us and for our children”.




+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86