 |
06-01-2004, 08:01 PM
|
#181 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 31
| I agree with your last statement too.  You're right about jets, but a dedicated prop-driven nightfighter in full production in '42 would've made a great diference.
Best regards
Chris |
| |
06-01-2004, 08:04 PM
|
#182 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,511
Country: | if the Luftwaffe could have perfected a twin prop ac/ with AI in 1942 things would have changed in the night skies over the Reich, or at least be on par with the Mossie XIX and XXX. The P-61 still had too many bugs to work out of it..... |
| |
06-01-2004, 08:12 PM
|
#183 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 31
| P61? I cannot consider this ugly beast a good nightfighter for european skies... maybe it was good in Pacific. I cannot compare these two theaters because in Europe the nighfighting was more intense.
Cheers |
| |
06-01-2004, 11:36 PM
|
#184 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| The P-61s had a fair amount of success in Europe. It would have had even greater success if its development and initial deployment could have gone smoother. And while the 'intensity' might have been different between the ETO and the PTO, the techniques and equipment needed for night fighting were basically the same, weren't they?
__________________ |
| |
06-02-2004, 03:52 PM
|
#185 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 250
| Quote:
from my files............a nice little comparision for all of you between the Bf 110G-4 and the Ju 88G-6.
time frame is April of 45 when the staffeln of the nf force was consolidated.
Bf 110G-4:
Stab, 1 ,4 and 7./NJG 1
Stab./NJG 4
Stab, 4 and 7./NJG 5, mixed.........
Stab and 7./NJG 6
Ju 88G-6:
Stab, I, II, and III./NJG 2
Stab, I. 7 and 10./NJG 3
Stab, I., 4 and 7./NJG 4
Stab, I., 4, 7, and 10./NJG 5
Stab, I., 4, and 10./NJG 6
I. and II./NJG 100
Nachtjagdstaffel Norwegen
tottles
E ~
_________________
Nur die jenigen, die man vergisst, sind wirklich tot
| sweet where did you get them
__________________ manchester united rock engaland are gona win eruo 2004 |
| |
06-03-2004, 12:12 AM
|
#186 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,511
Country: | you know Brad I am not really sure..........have had it since 1966. |
| |
06-04-2004, 04:49 PM
|
#187 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Saco, MAINE!!!!
Posts: 894
Country: | Thank all for the great reading. I have enjoyed reading about the German a/c and am glad to see others them RAF and USAAC fans.
AS for the Black Widow being ugly it might not have the grace of the P-38 or F7F, but it was a night fighter and one that truely did do its job. As for not proforming in the ETO maybe because the RAF did have good n/f units already and more combat under them. 
__________________ 
Seaplanes Are so nice |
| |
06-04-2004, 04:57 PM
|
#188 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,511
Country: | P-61's // not quite, it was due to the lack of experience in the night air war and problems of identifying friend from foe. As I said earlier the P-61 units are responsible for at least 2 RAF Mossie shoot-downs due to the forementioned problems. many times the radar AI shut down prematurily. There were plenty of targets in December of 44 as the German nf force lost over 114 twin engine fighters at night........
if anything that was done consistantly for the 418th, 422nd and 425th nfs was their night ground attack follies and they were quite accomplished at this task..... |
| |
06-05-2004, 04:37 PM
|
#189 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Saco, MAINE!!!!
Posts: 894
Country: | Follies?
I agree that we were "Green" in night combat and I have not found good information as to any USAAC pilots going over to fly and get practical experiance, any help on that? But I still think that as the P-61 got that combat experance it worked out a lot of the problums. But yes the night intruder missions were bery good. 
__________________ 
Seaplanes Are so nice |
| |
06-05-2004, 08:21 PM
|
#190 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,061
Country: | Willow, he means missions by the follies, I do believe. A light hearted approach to such a devestating act.
The P-61 certainly showed some impact on the ground during the night, but they were really not suitable for the fighter role. The pilots being green did not serve well for the RAF pilots. The Mosquito had the gap filled, after all, the reputation it got, and the attention payed to it by the Luftwaffe certainly shows its worth.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
06-05-2004, 11:08 PM
|
#191 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| But the Mosqito's succes didn't eliminate the need for a USAAF night fighter. And the P-61 project was begun way back in '42 when no one was really sure how successful the Mossie would be.
__________________ |
| |
06-06-2004, 11:37 AM
|
#192 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,511
Country: | yes plan_D had it correct the P-61 was much better suited to night ground attack in the ETO than regular night fighter duties. I have reports of German night fighter crews easily avoiding the big heavy a/c by simply banking sharply and diving away. Encounter reports via the 422nd and 425th nfs microfische in my possession say the same thing. Once the radar operator had the fix and before the pilot could get a positive visula the German a/c would bank away and dive steeply, the contact being lost.
Truthfully as said the Mosquito sqadrons could not be everywhere and there were of course limits in areas covered, so the P-61 squadrons would then be available to protect Pattons army sector. this for operations in fall of 44 through till war's end.
As for the PTO I am not usue of the real effectiveness of the fighter but obviously there were many kills against Japanese a/c. |
| |
06-07-2004, 12:03 AM
|
#193 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| I'm not sure about this but I believe the top two Black Widow squadrons were in the ETO with number 3 being in the PTO. That should be expected since pilots in the ETO would have had a greater number of targets. I believe I read something about P-61 crews using night-vision equipment which should have helped the P-61 established visual contact at a greater distance but I don't have the article with me to check that.
__________________ |
| |
06-07-2004, 10:46 AM
|
#194 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,511
Country: | here's some stats for all of you on the P-61 units....
6th nfs in the PTO had 23 kills, 5 of them by the P-38.
414th in the ETO had 13 kills
415th in the MED had 11 all by the Beaufighter although the unit had the P-61.
416th had 5 kills by the Mossie and Beaufighter in the MED
417th had 9 kills in the MED by the Beaufighter
418th had 20 in the PTO
419th in the PTO had 6
421st had 13 in the PTO
422nd had 43 plus 5 V-1's in the ETO
423 in the ETO had 0, flew A-20's
425th in the ETO had 10 plus 4 V-1's. unit may have had another 5 German a/c to their list but unconfirmed.
426th in the PTO had 5
427th in the PTO had 0
547th in the PTO had 7 kills, 1 from a P-38
548th in the PTO had 5
549th in the PTO had 1 kill
550th in the PTO had 0.
E ~ |
| |
06-07-2004, 01:00 PM
|
#195 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16
| now thats a list 
__________________ |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM. |  | |