Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Best Pacific Fighter?

Polls Discuss Best Pacific Fighter? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Ive never read anything other than that the P-38 scored the most against the Japanese. Where'd you get ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Polls

View Poll Results: Best Pacific Fighter?
Lockheed P-38 Lightning 169 20.61%
Mitsubishi A6M Zero 96 11.71%
Chance-Vought F4U Corsair 249 30.37%
Curtiss P-40 Warhawk 39 4.76%
Nakajima Ki-43 Hayabusa 16 1.95%
Grumman F6F Hellcat 124 15.12%
Kawanishi N1K2/J Shiden 127 15.49%
Voters: 820. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-18-2005, 11:14 AM   #286
Konfused with a 'K'
 
cheddar cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country:
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Ive never read anything other than that the P-38 scored the most against the Japanese. Where'd you get that information?
__________________

with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 12:43 PM   #287
Master of Ewes
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country:
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
no all information you have posted has the P-38 down for the most jap planes CLAIMED..........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 03:05 PM   #288
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese
Ive never read anything other than that the P-38 scored the most against the Japanese. Where'd you get that information?
That is because you missed the part that said 'USAAF'.
KraziKanuK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 03:29 PM   #289
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 24
Quote:
1st Place: F6F with 5163 (just bombers and fighters)
2d Place: F4U with 2138 (just bombers and fighters)
3d Place: P-38 with 1700 (all types)

And USAAF in the Pacific (Cental, Southwest, and Aleutians) recorded some 3715 credited victories. The F6F beat that all by itself.
acesman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 03:33 PM   #290
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 24
Quote:
1st Place: F6F with 5163 (just bombers and fighters)
2d Place: F4U with 2138 (just bombers and fighters)
3d Place: P-38 with 1700 (all types)

And USAAF in the Pacific (Cental, Southwest, and Aleutians) recorded some 3715 credited victories. The F6F beat that all by itself.
Could you please cite your source? If possible give a URL
acesman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 04:03 PM   #291
Konfused with a 'K'
 
cheddar cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country:
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Quote:
Originally Posted by KraziKanuK
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese
Ive never read anything other than that the P-38 scored the most against the Japanese. Where'd you get that information?
That is because you missed the part that said 'USAAF'.
That is most likely.
__________________

with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 04:29 PM   #292
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 24
I will quote wmaxt from the "p51 vs p47" poll

Quote:
In the MTO and the Pacific The P-38 was the best. Historians credit it with 5,730+ in the PTO and 608 in the MTO ( included in the 2,500). Considering they did this while doing Close escort, ground attack and more experienced adversaries And less aircraft 10,000 P-38s (8,200+ kills total for the war) to 15,000+ p-51s (5,932 kills for the war) and 16,000 P-47s (7,000+ kills for the war) is even more remarkable.
R Leonard said

Quote:
1st Place: F6F with 5163 (just bombers and fighters)
2d Place: F4U with 2138 (just bombers and fighters)
3d Place: P-38 with 1700 (all types)

And USAAF in the Pacific (Cental, Southwest, and Aleutians) recorded some 3715 credited victories. The F6F beat that all by itself.
There seems to be considerable differences in the numbers, and by the first quote, the F6F/F4U combined comes in second place. I have not been able to to attribute any of the above numbers, but what I have found is that one fighter group, the 475th (top scoring Group in the war), accounted for over 550 enemy planes. This would seem to raise doubt about your number of 1700, since there were many fighter groups using P-38's during the Pacific War.

BTW, what is the Southwest Pacific? I have heard South Pacific used often, but I do not recall hearing Southwest Pacific except to refer to Australia/Nwe Zealand
acesman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 04:32 PM   #293
Konfused with a 'K'
 
cheddar cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country:
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Good points acesman. Those are similar statistics to what I have read.
__________________

with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 04:47 PM   #294
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 24
http://usfighter.tripod.com/

The site listed above has some stats about many of the US fighters in this poll. According to them, and their quoted sources, the Hellcat racked up 5,156 kills and a very impressive 19:1 kill ratio. This is all F6F's, Navy, Marine and Land Based(?). They are credited (by the Navy) with nearly 80% of all enemy planes shot down by friendly aircraft.

The P-38 is also mentioned, as credited with the most Japanese planes killed, although numbers were not given on that page.

There have always been differences in the numbers, and to add to the mix, late in the War in the Pacific, credit was given for enemy aircraft on the GROUND! I believe the pure numbers are not as relevant as the longevity, total contribution and adaptability of an airframe. I have no problem with saying that the P-38 is the finest Army fighter, and the F6F was the finest Navy fighter, over the course of the Pacific War (1941-1945)
acesman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 04:51 PM   #295
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 24
Clarification of previous post; the Hellcat is credited with nearly 80% of Navy/Marine air-to-air kills.[/u]
acesman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2005, 09:24 PM   #296
Senior Member
 
R Leonard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 423
Country:
Yeah, but maybe you should read that whole thread, as that line of claim, IMHO thoroughly debunked.

I defy you to find an official USAF source, on or off the internet, that quotes the 5730+ number for the P-38. What you’re reading is shear aficionado BS.

I am still waiting for you to produce an official source.

My numbers come from official USAAF and USN sources. Let’s see you do that.

You show me yours and I'll show you mine, afterall, I asked first.

Oh, and contrary to your belief, aircraft destroyed on the ground were not counted as air to air victories. Did they keep track of planes destroyed on the ground? Oh sure, but as an order of battle intelligence exercise. Never were they added to some pilot's official score. You have been misinformed. Or perhaps you have an official source for that claim as well?

And you might want to read up on your WWII history. You just might discover that the Southwest Pacific Theater was that under the command of General MacArthur.


Regards,

Rich
__________________
hmmm ... I wonder what this switch does ...
R Leonard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 12:30 AM   #297
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Actually, they did give credit for ground kills through the 2nd half of the war, to encourage pilots to go down and strafe them.

Then, after the war, they changed their minds and these kills were not credited.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 12:33 AM   #298
Senior Member
 
R Leonard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 423
Country:
Not in the Navy. And I can't find anything that indicates the Army did, either. As far as I know the only folks who got credit for ground kills were the AVG. Do you have an official source for that? I'd be interesting in seeing it.

Regards,

Rich
__________________
hmmm ... I wonder what this switch does ...
R Leonard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 01:07 AM   #299
Anonymous
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Leonard
Not in the Navy. And I can't find anything that indicates the Army did, either. As far as I know the only folks who got credit for ground kills were the AVG. Do you have an official source for that? I'd be interesting in seeing it.

Regards,

Rich
I don't think there is an official source, it was never actually "official". What I remember is they were told ground kills would count - but then they wern't. This may only have been for the USAAF in Europe, I'm not sure.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 10:12 PM   #300
Senior Member
 
R Leonard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 423
Country:
Quote:
There seems to be considerable differences in the numbers, and by the first quote, the F6F/F4U combined comes in second place. I have not been able to to attribute any of the above numbers, but what I have found is that one fighter group, the 475th (top scoring Group in the war), accounted for over 550 enemy planes. This would seem to raise doubt about your number of 1700, since there were many fighter groups using P-38's during the Pacific War
.

475 Fighter Group was indeed a high scoring FG, but I sure wouldn’t go extrapolating the performance of all fighter groups based on a single example. That’s not a very good statistical analysis practice or technique. 475 FG consisted of 431, 432, and 433 Fighter Squadrons. Their records can be located in the National Archives on microfilms A0807 and A0808. Reports consist of M1065/3 - 0703 to end; M1065/4 - 0005 to 0631; M1065/8 - 0070 to 0591; and M1065/9 - 0005 to 0760. Squadron records indicate:
431st Fighter Squadron: 221 confirmed / 14 probable / 7.5 damaged
432nd Fighter Squadron: 167 / 21 / 14
433rd Fighter Squadron: 121 / 23 / 12
Totals: 509 / 38 / 33.5

Well, let’s see . . .
VF-2 in two deployments, 11/43 to 1/44 aboard CV-6 and 3/44 to 9/44 aboard CV-12, results were 246 / 34 / 2. That’s as good as any of the 475 FG squadrons. VF-9’s final roll-up count was 256.75 / 31 / 55. Do I need to go on? Okay, there were 24 USN fighter squadrons with more than 100 confirmed credits, most of which, BTW, were F6F squadrons (VBF-1, VF-2, VF-3, VF-5, VF-6, VF-8, VF-9, VF-10, VF-11, VF-14, VF-15, VF-16, VBF-17, VF-17, VF-18, VF-19, VF-20, VF-21, VF-27, VF-29, VF-30, VF-31, VF-80 and VF-83. Five squadrons posted more than 200 victories: VF-10 (217 / 23.5 / 26); VF-18 (250.5 / 33 / 16); VF-9 (256.75 / 31 / 55); VF-15 (310 / 34 / 28.5) and VF-17 (313 / 48 / 48).

Comparatively, there were 13 USAAF squadrons in the Pacific that scored in excess of 100 aerial credits (7 FS, 8 FS, 9 FS, 35 FS, 39 FS, 40 FS, 44 FS, 80 FS, 339 FS, 342 FS, 431 FS, 432 FS, and 433 FS. Four FS achieved more that 200 victory credits: 8 FS (207 / 23 / 17); 80 FS (213 / 57 / 11); 431 FS (above); and 9 FS (254 / 63 / 20).

The breakdown of aerial victories in the Pacific by USAAF aircraft type goes something like:
P-38 = 1,700
P-47 = 697
P-40 = 661
P-51/F-6 = 297
P-39/P-400 = 288
P-61 = 64
P-36 = 3
P-70 = 2
P-26 = 2
P-35 = 1
Total = 3,715

That’s it, that’s all, there weren’t any more, no 5730 shootdowns by P-38’s, not even 5730 total shootdowns. All derived from from USAAF records. Not some aficionado’s website. Believe what you wish, but the truth shall set you free.

Show me an official USAF source that says different.

Regards,

Rich
__________________
hmmm ... I wonder what this switch does ...
R Leonard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91