Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Best Piston Engined Fighter Ever...

Polls Discuss Best Piston Engined Fighter Ever... in the World War II - Aviation forums; This is a carry over from a discussion thread... Decided to make it a Poll.... Vote for The Best Piston ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Polls

View Poll Results: Best Piston Engined Fighter Ever...
Ta 152H-1 36 20.69%
Ta 152C-1 4 2.30%
Fw 190D-12 4 2.30%
Fw 190D-13 8 4.60%
Ki-84 Ib Hayate {Frank} 1 0.57%
Ki-100 Ib Otsu {Tony} 0 0%
N1K2-J Shiden-Kai {George} 0 0%
F4U-4 Corsair 9 5.17%
F4U-5 Corsair 13 7.47%
F8F-2 Bearcat 9 5.17%
P-51H Mustang 31 17.82%
P-47N Thunderbolt 10 5.75%
DH Hornet 3 1.72%
Hawker Tempest II 5 2.87%
Hawker Sea Fury 12 6.90%
Spitfire Mk XXI {21} 8 4.60%
Spitfire Mk XXIV {24} 14 8.05%
Bf 109K-14 3 1.72%
Bf 109K-4 4 2.30%
Voters: 174. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-20-2007, 06:12 PM   #1
Minister of Whoopass
 
lesofprimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 12,369
Country:
Best Piston Engined Fighter Ever...

This is a carry over from a discussion thread... Decided to make it a Poll.... Vote for The Best Piston Engined Fighter Ever.... Combat experience is a plus....
__________________

"This Was a Fight to The Death.... He's Out to Kill Me, and I'm Gonna Get Him..."
--Capt. Stan "Swede" Vejtasa
"Hollywood Finally Got it Right..." - 12/15/07
lesofprimus is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 06:59 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Udet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rising Above
Posts: 1,192
Country:
The very first vote here was mine.

The Ta 152 H hands down. With the brief combat experience gained by the guys flying in stab./JG 301 the model proved its lethality, with confirmed kills even at tree top altitude...whereas the bulk of the fighters on the list in the poll saw no combat action or did not engage the enemy.
__________________
In a national survey, 92% of the French people believed they are not ugly: 93% of them were wrong.

Last edited by Udet : 03-20-2007 at 07:06 PM.
Udet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 11:02 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Civettone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg
Posts: 871
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Civettone Send a message via Skype™ to Civettone
I'll go for the Bf 109K-14 and Spitfire 21 because they're the best bang for the buck. (I voted for the 109 to pick one.)

They were agile, efficient, fast, good at all altitudes unlike the Ta 152H (I know it "could hold its own" at low altitude, but that's not good enough IMO).

Kris
__________________

Civettone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 05:18 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Gnomey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK (atm Pretoria, South Africa)
Posts: 10,712
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Gnomey Send a message via MSN to Gnomey
Overall I voted for the Ta-152H (Udet has said the main reasons), with for me the Sea Fury and Spitfire 24 not far behind.
__________________


"Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill

"To him the people of the world largely owe the Freedom and liberties they enjoy today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London


Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum
Gnomey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 09:27 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Ta-152 H-1, as its highly maneuverable and fast at ALL altitudes, which can't said about most other fighters on the list.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 10:05 AM   #6
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,136
Country:
Hmm I have to think about this one. My initial thoughts go for the Ta-152H but there are quite a bit of unknowns about her. I thinks he certainly was the best flying when the war ended but I dont know if I can go with best ever.

I certainly can not go for the Bf 109K-14 even though the 109 is my favorite aircraft. The 109K-14 was delivered in to small of numbers and I am not even sure if it even saw combat. Does anyone know exactly how many K-14s were built and how many saw combat if any?

The Bearcat was nice, but I am not sure how it would have done in combat. Maybe someone can ask the French since they used it as a fighter bomber in Indo China but then again I dont think it saw air to air. Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Same goes for the P-51H. Not proven in combat.

So therefore my vote is going to either go for the Sea Fury or the Ta-152H. I have to brew over this a bit though. I do lean toward the Ta-152H though only because I love it so much.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 11:35 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
My initial thought was also the Sea Fury, however looking at overall performance at altitude it became clear that the Ta-152H would have the advantage most of the time.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 02:15 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,024
Country:
Since this is the best Fighter ever, and not Dog Fighter, I debated with myself (always confusing) between the F4U-4 and the F4U-5. The F4U-4 was probably the best dog fighter below 20K ever (except for the F4U-5). It was faster than the Ta-152H and had a much greater climb capability in that area. The dogfighting capability would swap with the Ta-152H above 25K. I don't know much about the performance of the F-4U-5 except that it would probably out perform the Ta-152H up to 35K.

The F4U-4 fought in three wars, WWII, Korea, and Soccer.
The F4U-5 fought in two war, Korea, and Soccer.

Either F4Us would be the best air-to-ground fighter, except maybe a tie with the P-47N.

Either F4Us were carrier compatable.

All-in-all thats an impressive capability in one aircraft.

Without a doubt, the F4U-4 or 5 were the best all around fighters. I picked the F4U-4 due to its longevity and record and the fact I don't have a lot of performance data on the -5
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 02:51 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
The Ta-152H was undoubtedly a better dogfighter at all altitudes, had a top SL speed of ~600 km/h, and at 5,000 + ft/min was certainly every bit as good a climber.

Don't get me wrong, the F4U-4 was a great fighter, in the same class as the Fw-190 D-9 and Spitfire Mk.XIV, but it wasn't in the same class as the Ta-152H.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 03:14 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Civettone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg
Posts: 871
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Civettone Send a message via Skype™ to Civettone
I don't know if air-to-ground should play a role.

At high altitude the Ta 152H was the best but I don't see ANY reason why it would be better at medium and low altitudes than the other fighters on that list. And lower altitudes are far more common than the altitude the Ta 152H was designed for. Hardly any fights took place over 10k. It's like having a F1 car for a rally race...

Kris
__________________

Civettone is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 03:31 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Yet the Ta-152H holds a 11:0 kill ratio at low - medium altitude. Not a single Ta-152H was ever shot down.

Also how many of the fighters above exceed 600 km/h at SL ? Not that many. And almost none can boast with a 5,000 + ft/min climb rate. And above 8.5 km the Ta-152H climbs on average 1,000 + ft/min faster than the competition.
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 05:06 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,024
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
Yet the Ta-152H holds a 11:0 kill ratio at low - medium altitude. Not a single Ta-152H was ever shot down.

Also how many of the fighters above exceed 600 km/h at SL ? Not that many. And almost none can boast with a 5,000 + ft/min climb rate. And above 8.5 km the Ta-152H climbs on average 1,000 + ft/min faster than the competition.
I suspect that all the kills were at low altitude against aircraft that had much poorer performance than the Ta-152H such as the P-51D and Tempest. I am sure the climb info is correct for WWII aircraft but probably not true for the F4U-5.

The F4U-4 was capable of 600 km/hr at SL and was 24 km/hr faster at 20k ft. I don't have any data that shows the Ta-152H capable of 5000 ft/min climb at SL. The only document I have shows a much lower rate of climb. If you have supporting data, I would like to correct my data base. It presently shows 3445 ft/min SL., much lower than the F4U-4 at 4800 ft/min.

The F4U-5 was way faster at SL than either the F4U-4 or Ta-152H at 648 km/hr. as was the P-51H with 660 km/hr at SL.

I have good speed data on the Ta-152H (which you provided) but lousy data on time to climb and climb rate. If you have some of this data, I would certainly appretiate it.

And, I don't think the Ta-152 was that great at air-to-ground and carrier landings .
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 05:41 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 1,649
Country:
OK, TA152-1: Vmax=472mph@41010 ft, service ceiling=48550 ft, range clean=755 mls, 1-30mm w/90 rds, 2-20mm w/170 rds, initial rate of climb=3445 fpm. F4U-5: Vmax=462mph@31400 ft, service ceiling=41400ft, range clean=1036 mls, 4-20mm w/924 rds, initial rate of climb=4230fpm add that up plus Corsair much more robust, better armor, more reliable radial engine that is less susceptible to battle damage, can carry 4000 lb bomb load and operate off of carrier and good combat record in Korea, Indo-china and French used version of it in Algeria plus was used by various countries in Central and South America. Winner-F4U-5
renrich is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 07:43 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Soren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,682
Davparlr, the 17.5 m/s climb rate is at Steig u. Kampfleistung.

Time to climb 10km was 10.1min at Sondernotlesitung for the Ta-152H.
Climb rate at 8.8km at Sondernotleistung was 14.5 m/s, 4.5 m/s faster than the P-51H at 90" Hg.

I'll provide the doc's tommorrow, have to get some sleep now
__________________

We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland
Soren is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 09:13 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
davparlr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,024
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren View Post
Davparlr, the 17.5 m/s climb rate is at Steig u. Kampfleistung.

Time to climb 10km was 10.1min at Sondernotlesitung for the Ta-152H.


Climb rate at 8.8km at Sondernotleistung was 14.5 m/s, 4.5 m/s faster than the P-51H at 90" Hg.

I'll provide the doc's tommorrow, have to get some sleep now
This is certainly where the Ta-152H shines.
davparlr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com