Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Best WWII automatic weapon

Polls Discuss Best WWII automatic weapon in the World War II - Aviation forums; Shotguns are used by all branches of the US Army for close quarter combat such as what is going on ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Polls

View Poll Results: Best WWII Automatic weapon
Thompson 32 35.16%
MP40 26 28.57%
Sten 5 5.49%
PPSh-41 16 17.58%
M3/A1 Grease Gun 4 4.40%
Owen 5 5.49%
Beretta Modello 1918 3 3.30%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-29-2007, 01:29 PM   #121
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,590
Country:
Shotguns are used by all branches of the US Army for close quarter combat such as what is going on in Iraq.

When we did Air Assaults there was allways a squad member on our aircraft who had a shot gun.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 09:19 PM   #122
Senior Member
 
Aussie1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Queensland- Australia
Posts: 787
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Aussie1001
Ok thaks guys wasnt sure.....
Just as a side point is there any point in having restrictions for weapons in war......
__________________


We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.
Winston Churchill...

Aussie1001 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 08:05 PM   #123
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,590
Country:
Nope because the only people that will follow them are the Western Allies.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 01:26 AM   #124
Senior Member
 
Aussie1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Queensland- Australia
Posts: 787
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Aussie1001
thats what i mean the only people that are going to follow them are honest countries and there arn't too many of them around. There will be no incentive to follow 'cause everyone else will have one but you......
__________________


We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.
Winston Churchill...

Aussie1001 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 01:45 AM   #125
Senior Member
 
trackend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 3,422
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
Nope because the only people that will follow them are the Western Allies.
Agreed Adler. All this lets ban Mines tripe makes me laugh I can just imagine Iran the Taliban ect ect saying lets not produce mines as its a bit naughty. If a IED is not a type of mine whether remote or trip operated then my pricks a bloater.
trackend is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 01:48 AM   #126
Senior Member
 
Aussie1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Queensland- Australia
Posts: 787
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Aussie1001
agree with everything trakkie who is going to obey them..
__________________


We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.
Winston Churchill...

Aussie1001 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 04:40 PM   #127
Senior Member
 
drgondog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,903
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucanus View Post

If you read about Edson's Ridge (aka Raider Ridge) on the Canal, you will see
that those Gyrenes were using 50 cals with water jacketsto defend their pos
and the airfield behind...In the daylight in front of the pos the Japs were in
piles...

Two last things....Has anybody ever noticed they always give the BAR to the
feather-merchant? And did you know that according to the Geneva
Convention it is unlawful (read a BIG NO NO) to use the M2 or any other
HMG against troops?
of couse our guys loved being taken under fire by German 20mm flak..
drgondog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 08:43 AM   #128
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 28,590
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by trackend View Post
Agreed Adler. All this lets ban Mines tripe makes me laugh I can just imagine Iran the Taliban ect ect saying lets not produce mines as its a bit naughty. If a IED is not a type of mine whether remote or trip operated then my pricks a bloater.
Basically the only countries that abide by the rules are NATO countries and a few other ones.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2007, 04:11 PM   #129
Senior Member
 
Soundbreaker Welch?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,413
Country:
In the WWI airwar, wasn't it considered bad show to fire machineguns with incendiary bullets, designed for taking down ballons by bursting them into flames, into enemy aircraft with pilots? I think there was even a rule saying, that if all your gun had was incendiary bullets, you couldn't fire back at an enemy plane, even if he was attacking you. I guess it was because it was even more painful to have a bullet burning your insides as an added cruelty.

In WWII, didn't they stop following this rule? As I understand, a lot of WWII planes used incendiary bullets?



Edit: I found the bullet I was thinking of was the Pomeroy Bullet. They didn't use them in WWII. It sounded like the Browning .50 caliber could use incendiary bullets, and the British Browning .30 caliber, and didn't the German MG 131 use them too?

Well, since it was WWII, something had to get worse, and the planes were also tougher to shoot down.


The Pomeroy Bullet
Updated - Saturday, 9 August, 2003

The Pomeroy Bullet was an explosive machine gun bullet deployed specifically for use against the Zeppelin threat over Britain. The incendiary bullet, developed by New Zealand engineer John Pomeroy (1873-1950) in 1902, was quickly adopted by British defence services as a means of combating the growing German Zeppelin threat in the skies above Britain.

Filled with nitro-glycerine the bullet ignited the hydrogen gas which escaped from the tear in the Zeppelin gas bag created by the bullet's passage. The bullet's effectiveness led to a marked decrease in the number of Zeppelin attacks.

In time Pomeroy was paid some £25,000 in royalties for his invention

First World War.com - Encyclopedia - The Pomeroy Bullet
__________________

"His motor's conked out!"
"What's the differance, they're all Nazis!"
"Luke, shut up!"
"Fear the hook!"
"Oh.....I wanna fly."
"You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?"
"What you doing? Oh Nooooo!"

Last edited by Soundbreaker Welch? : 09-08-2007 at 04:39 PM.
Soundbreaker Welch? is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2007, 08:05 PM   #130
Senior Member
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,952
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
Nope because the only people that will follow them are the Western Allies.


Kinda like today with the ballistic tip bullets in the MiddleEast. Some claim that they are "expanding bullets" when in actuality they are only plastic tipped bullets made so for accuracy and whose performance is not expansion, but rather they fragment because they are fragile match bullets.

War is not politically correct. Even the Germans complained about shotguns in WWI as being inhumane. The US uses them to this day while abiding by the Geneva convention that no terrorist will ever hold dear.

Gun laws are only obeyed by civilized people. And I question why we continue to fight a civilized war with these savages.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2007, 04:02 AM   #131
Senior Member
 
Aussie1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Queensland- Australia
Posts: 787
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Aussie1001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt308 View Post


Kinda like today with the ballistic tip bullets in the MiddleEast. Some claim that they are "expanding bullets" when in actuality they are only plastic tipped bullets made so for accuracy and whose performance is not expansion, but rather they fragment because they are fragile match bullets.

War is not politically correct. Even the Germans complained about shotguns in WWI as being inhumane. The US uses them to this day while abiding by the Geneva convention that no terrorist will ever hold dear.

Gun laws are only obeyed by civilized people. And I question why we continue to fight a civilized war with these savages.
A Very Very valid point and one that i think is sadly true....
__________________


We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.
Winston Churchill...

Aussie1001 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 04:01 AM   #132
Senior Member
 
Screaming Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,035
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Screaming Eagle
Quote:
Originally Posted by drgondog View Post
The only feature I didn't care for on the Thompson was tendency to 'ride up' in fully automatic fire - but I learned to fire short bursts and was able to control it just fine.
That is why they addded a Cutts compensator on the M1 variant.
__________________


"Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor.
Screaming Eagle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 01:28 PM   #133
Senior Member
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,952
Country:
...and then removed it because it was operationally insignificant and too expensive to machine.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2007, 02:43 AM   #134
Senior Member
 
Screaming Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,035
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Screaming Eagle
thanks for the info matt, I didn't know that.
__________________


"Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor.
Screaming Eagle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2007, 03:12 PM   #135
Senior Member
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,952
Country:
All of those niceties that made the Thompson such a work of art were scrapped because of expediency, too expensive or no military utility.

- Cutts compensator
- 50rd drum mag
- Cooling fins
- Adjustable sights

Too bad you can't buy a semi-auto version to plink around with that doesn't have the short barrel on it. You can, but here in the US you have to have a Class III license and the 16" barrel is a visual monstrosity.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg m1a1thom.jpg (8.1 KB, 27 views)
File Type: jpg m1a1.jpg (14.4 KB, 27 views)
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com