 |
09-06-2008, 01:14 AM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 844
Country: | Do 335 vs Me 262 Okay, there seems to be a definite subliminal debate going on in a number of threads (including a couple of recent ones) concerning which aircraft had the better future. One of these aircraft never actually reached combat, yet exhibited quite a bit of potential, especially in the bomber-destroyer role. The other aircraft was quite successful in this role, even though there were only ever a limited number of aircraft available at any given time. The first aircraft represented the epitome of reciprocating engine aircraft development, whereas the other exhibited unheard of potential, while still being limited by inferior materials and insufficient logistics.
Which aircraft SHOULD the Third Reich have concentrated on late in the War? An aircraft using a tried-and-true technology, yet still exhibiting spectacular performance? Or a revolutionary aircraft using revolutionary propulsion (literally), yet limited by the inferior quality of it's materiel and logistics?
I would argue that, yes, the Me 262 WAS a tremendous success; however, what the Third Reich really needed in late '44/early '45 was a reliable and effective means of destroying invading Allied bombers, hence the Do 335 (and, by extension, the Ta 152/153 series of aircraft). Unfortunately, the Me 262 was limited by the life-span of it's propulsion system, which had an MTO of approximately 25 hours (sometimes less); the Do 335 had no such limitation. Also, the training of pilots should have been much easier (and safer), as they would be dealing with a technology with which they should already have been familiar with.
Please vote as to which aircraft you think SHOULD have been a production priority in the late War struggle against the Allied bomber campaign over Germany.
__________________
Last edited by SoD Stitch : 09-07-2008 at 07:49 PM.
Reason: Spelling
|
| |
09-06-2008, 01:51 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,635
Country: | No contest IMO.
>>Which aircraft SHOULD the Third Reich have concentrated on late in the War?
The 262 could have been a better bomber killer/fighter much earlier if certain arrogant bozos didn't lack vision. In addition to the many performance supremacy's, the 262 had psychological advantages that cannot be under stated. Unless a piston aircraft had the high ground and the 262 was out of energy, the 262 must was a feared opponent. Kinda like a F-22 taking on a flying saucer.
The performance of the Pfeil was admirable but I'd have to see manufacturing stats to change my mind.
Are you talking about 2000 ME 262's vs. 2000 Do 335's? Or 1000 262's vs. 3000 Do 335's? The economy of the manufacturing could decide the vote.
It's easy to say that three times as many 335's would have done the Reich more good but IMO the Pfeil would not have been a great fighter.
Bomber destroyer supreme... yes.. but swarms of P-51's would have ate it for lunch.
__________________ “Despite the threat of SAMs and increasing visibility on 31 January 1991, one gunship opted to stay and continue to protect the Marines. A SAM subsequently shot down this AC-130H, call sign Spirit 03. All 14 crew members of Spirit 03 perished." www.NewMediaPerspective.com
Last edited by comiso90 : 09-06-2008 at 02:13 AM.
|
| |
09-06-2008, 05:44 AM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 260
Country: | Me 262 was the future. I think the average lifespan thing of the engines is a bit overrated: engines could be swapped rather easily on the 262 and average lifespan of a pilot in '45 was not much better than that of the Jumo. Engines were much less the problem than availability of proficient pilots to fly the thing.
I also doubt the Do was much easier on the newbies: The configuration and the size and weight sure were very different from what 109 pilots were used to. Compared to the 262 its airframe also had more quirks to be ironed out, at least that's what I gather from reading about it. There was a proposed mixed-propulsion version that may have been promising. But then, how much faster than the 750+something km/h could a prop fighter go? It was already bumping into aerodynamical limitations. The 262 had the potential to reach 900 km/h with the developments that were already underway and even with the same 004B engines. |
| |
09-06-2008, 07:31 AM
|
#4 | | Minister of Whoopass
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island Native in Mississippi
Posts: 13,734
Country: | 262, for all the reasons above...
__________________ "After That Second Kill, I Knew It Was Time To Get The Hell Outta There..."-- Lt. William Northrop Case
To See My IL2 Sturmovik Video Tribute to My Grandfather, Click Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtzN5RuNNJk |
| |
09-06-2008, 08:05 AM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Adelaide Sth. Aust.
Posts: 6,378
Country: | Have to go with the Me262...
As Comiso said the bozos didn't see it for what it was...it WAS the next step in aircraft evolution, yet it was bogged down in so much BS...
__________________ |
| |
09-06-2008, 09:39 AM
|
#6 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,756
Country: | and please rule out the Ta 152H altogether as it was designed for high interception of the Allies escort fighters not designed for bomber interception, though if had to it could. |
| |
09-06-2008, 01:27 PM
|
#7 | | World Traveler
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 12,090
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by lesofprimus 262, for all the reasons above... | Bingo, the same reasons for me as well.
__________________ "Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill "To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum My Photo Collections on Flickr |
| |
09-06-2008, 09:06 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 844
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Little Have to go with the Me262...
As Comiso said the bozos didn't see it for what it was...it WAS the next step in aircraft evolution, yet it was bogged down in so much BS... | You're right, the 262 could've entered service AT LEAST one year earlier than it did, if only the higher-ups had had their thinking caps on. I'm sure there are a lot of reasons why it didn't (politics comes to mind), but the bottom line is, if they had more or less perfected the engine technology a year earlier (the airframe was almost perfect; IIRC, the airframe was actually more aerodynamically efficient than the P-80's), I'm sure the War would've lasted much longer than it did.
__________________ |
| |
09-06-2008, 10:11 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Redding, California
Posts: 497
Country: | Definately the Me262 has my vote, as the Germans had jet technology on a learning curve advanced far enough that enhancements and upgrades were within arm's reach.
Ironically, Heinkel had the He280 combat ready before Messerschmitt's 262 and for a host of reasons, the 280 never reached production. Yet another saving grace for the allied effort.
If Hitler wasn't so obscessed with keeping the 262 as a bomber and allowed it to be the true fighter Willy had envisioned, there would have been a major shift in the airwar and related technology.
(And Galland wouldn't have threatened mutiny...lol) |
| |
09-07-2008, 04:10 AM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Heyfield, Victoria
Posts: 238
Country: | 262 all the way..
Dornier was fast yes but was totally outclassed but 262
__________________ Control tower to aircraft that just landed - "Bear right, next intersection"
Pilot - "Roger, we have him in sight" |
| |
09-07-2008, 11:59 AM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,122
| The Me-262 not doubt, in its presence it rendered all other fighters obsolete.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
09-07-2008, 12:06 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 2,635
Country: | The 262 is a vastly superior aircraft but The Pfeil would have been cheaper and easier to manufacture.
What's better.... 500 ME-262s or 2000 Do 335s?
__________________ “Despite the threat of SAMs and increasing visibility on 31 January 1991, one gunship opted to stay and continue to protect the Marines. A SAM subsequently shot down this AC-130H, call sign Spirit 03. All 14 crew members of Spirit 03 perished." www.NewMediaPerspective.com |
| |
09-07-2008, 12:17 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,122
| 500 Me-262's. Why ? Because they're close to untouchable if flown by experienced pilots.
With fighter cover the Do-335 would've been an excellent bomber destroyer, no doubt about it, but alone it simply didn't have high enough a performance to allow it to fight both the bombers and the escorts at the same time... The Me-262 on the other hand did.
__________________ We have built a total of about 1250 of this aircraft (Me-262), but only fifty were allowed to be used as fighters - as interceptors. And out of this fifty, there were never more than 25 operational. So we had only a very, very few.
- Adolf Galland |
| |
09-07-2008, 12:39 PM
|
#14 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,756
Country: | and both needed or would of needed high cover protection on taking off and landing during the day..............and enver fully received it in the case of the 262.
also a thought would be to look at fuel consumption for both a/c pretty lame and during late war very very troublesome |
| |
09-07-2008, 07:58 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 844
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Soren 500 Me-262's. Why ? Because they're close to untouchable if flown by experienced pilots. | Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your POV), the Third Reich did not have very many "experienced pilots". The few who survived the War to late '44/early '45 were very good, but that was probably 5% of the Luftwaffe's total pilot force in '44/'45; the other 95% were either totally new, or very lucky. What the Luftwaffe needed was an a/c that new pilots could fly effectively, without demanding too much of their attention. Yes, the Me 262 was an ace-in-the-hole, if you knew what you were doing; however, most LW pilots in late '44/early '45 didn't know what they were doing. My argument is that a "known" quantity (the Do 335) was a safer bet than an "unknown" quantity (the Me 262).
__________________ |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM. |  | |