 |
06-09-2007, 12:58 PM
|
#31 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 1,882
Country: | If you push the landing gear handle to the left and then up the gear will extend for landing on the Corsair. If pushed to the right and up the gear will extend in the dive brake mode. If the pilot tries the dive brakes above approx 255 knots the gear will dangle until a safe speed is reached. The dive brakes consist of the flat aluminum doors attached to the main gear struts. When the dive brake is used the tail wheel stays retracted. The aft main gear doors also remain retracted. The recorded percentage of hits on a 250 ft circle was only 7 % fewer than that of the SBD. |
| |
06-09-2007, 02:44 PM
|
#32 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8
Country: | Blackburn Skua - just to be controversial. Mind you it did work, after a fashion. Blackburn Skua
.. but I must say that I think the Brits failed to take the Blackburns and the Boulton Pauls, get rid of their silly turrets (where appropriate), and make them into half decent carrier borne fighters.
Its not that far-fetched, and they were no good for the RAF after all.
Imagine if all the Defiants had been given even 2 or 4 fwd firing guns, dump the turret, and other Navalisation features like a landing hook ?
It would have really helped early on in the Atlantic when Sea Hurricanes were mostly knackered ex-RAF lash ups, or shot off Catapaults on a one way trip ! |
| |
06-09-2007, 03:51 PM
|
#33 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,876
| I bet the Skua had a sterling combat record in the Pacific.
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
06-10-2007, 06:56 AM
|
#34 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Saffron Walden/Sheffield
Posts: 3,001
Country: | It was mainly used in Europe, 39-42ish I think so didn't see any action in the Pacific.
They were good planes, just very vulnerable to the 109s around back then.
3 of them sunk the Konigsberg of the coast of Norway- first time a carrier-borne dive bomber had sunk a ship
__________________ 
When you realise that the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train, you know it's time to run for your life |
| |
06-14-2007, 04:53 PM
|
#35 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 1,911
Country: | SBD for winning the Battle of Midway. SB2C for having the best capability
Swede Vejtasa for best Val/Zero killing dive bomber pilot of all time.. when Zero pilots were really good... in a SBD. |
| |
06-17-2007, 08:03 PM
|
#36 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Queensland
Posts: 1,248
Country: | Would be cool to have one gun hidden in the tail or something. First time Mr Me-109 comes in that way, and it's what the heck, this thing can fire backwards? |
| |
07-10-2007, 03:49 PM
|
#37 | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Altona, MB
Posts: 4
Country: | SBD all the way |
| |
07-10-2007, 04:40 PM
|
#38 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: UK
Posts: 3,435
Country: | SBD by a mile |
| |
07-10-2007, 05:31 PM
|
#39 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 1,673
Country: | SBD goin' away. Best lookin' as well.
__________________ “Let's get Enterprise and Hornet turned into the wind." |
| |
07-10-2007, 07:15 PM
|
#40 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
| I think the Helldiver sunk more ships, but I have to say SBD. I'm surprised more people didn't pick the Val. It did a lot of damage. |
| |
12-13-2007, 11:45 AM
|
#41 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Herrsching,near München
Posts: 190
Country: | Fairey Barracuda Mk111
__________________  It pays to know the enemy / not least because at some time you may have the opportunity to turn him into a friend.” Margaret Thatcher |
| |
12-13-2007, 12:08 PM
|
#42 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,876
| Quote:
Originally Posted by AVRoe Fairey Barracuda Mk111 | And what exactly did this airplane do to warrent its claim to be the best?
__________________ "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" |
| |
12-13-2007, 12:10 PM
|
#43 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pine Mountain Lake, California
Posts: 612
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by plan_D It's the Ju 87E, it didn't ever fly from a carrier but because of that ...you can't say it was bad at it.  | Actually, there were plans on the drawing board to construct an ocean-going version of the Ju 87B for the never-finished Graf Zeppelin aircraft carrier, but it never got beyong the planning stage.
__________________ |
| |
12-13-2007, 02:11 PM
|
#44 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 4,127
Country: | The SBD for me.. Look what happened at Midway...
Charles
__________________ Democrats think the glass is half full... Republicans think the glass is their's ! |
| |
12-13-2007, 02:16 PM
|
#45 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 4,127
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby Dude - the Ju 87E made a significant contribution to the war effort. Actually, it sunk HMS Hood. |
That's not the way I recall the account of the sinking. To my knowlege
there was no aircraft involved......
This from Wiki....
The first shots were fired at a range of about fourteen miles. The Hood raced toward the Bismarck in an attempt to close the range and reduce the time Hood's decks were exposed to plunging fire. Initially Hood engaged Prinz Eugen instead of Bismarck, a mistake the Prince of Wales did not repeat. The German ships quickly found the range to the Hood and she was hit first by an 8 inch (203mm) shell from Prinz Eugen on the boat deck which ignited 4 inch (102 mm) ammunition and UP rockets, causing a fire to burn out of control endangering the ship. Shortly after this, the Prinz Eugen shifted her aim to the Prince of Wales, in accordance with a semaphore order from Bismarck.[9] At about 0600 (0601 in German reckoning), Hood signalled a 20-degree turn to port which would have brought the aft turrets of the British ships into action. However, as the Hood began her turn, she was struck by one or more shells of Bismarck's fifth salvo, fired from a distance of between 15 and 18 km (about 8 to 9.5 nautical miles).[10] Almost immediately, a huge jet of flame burst out of Hood from the vicinity of the mainmast.[11] This was followed by a devastating explosion that destroyed the after part of the ship. The stern rose and sank rapidly before Hood's bow section reared up in the sea before it too sank.
Charles
__________________ Democrats think the glass is half full... Republicans think the glass is their's ! |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM. |  | |