 | 
12-14-2007, 12:13 PM
|
#46 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,270
Country:  | Quote:
Originally Posted by ccheese  That's not the way I recall the account of the sinking. To my knowlege
there was no aircraft involved......
This from Wiki....
The first shots were fired at a range of about fourteen miles. The Hood raced toward the Bismarck in an attempt to close the range and reduce the time Hood's decks were exposed to plunging fire. Initially Hood engaged Prinz Eugen instead of Bismarck, a mistake the Prince of Wales did not repeat. The German ships quickly found the range to the Hood and she was hit first by an 8 inch (203mm) shell from Prinz Eugen on the boat deck which ignited 4 inch (102 mm) ammunition and UP rockets, causing a fire to burn out of control endangering the ship. Shortly after this, the Prinz Eugen shifted her aim to the Prince of Wales, in accordance with a semaphore order from Bismarck.[9] At about 0600 (0601 in German reckoning), Hood signalled a 20-degree turn to port which would have brought the aft turrets of the British ships into action. However, as the Hood began her turn, she was struck by one or more shells of Bismarck's fifth salvo, fired from a distance of between 15 and 18 km (about 8 to 9.5 nautical miles).[10] Almost immediately, a huge jet of flame burst out of Hood from the vicinity of the mainmast.[11] This was followed by a devastating explosion that destroyed the after part of the ship. The stern rose and sank rapidly before Hood's bow section reared up in the sea before it too sank.
Charles | Charles he was kidding. pD knows that the Hood was sunk by the Bismark and that there were no carrier born Ju-87s. 
He was mocking someone else....
__________________  US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" | 
|  | |
12-14-2007, 12:20 PM
|
#47 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,477
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ccheese The SBD for me.. Look what happened at Midway...
Charles | And Coral Sea, The Guadalcanal Campaign, Rabaul, Truk .....
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?" | |
| | |
12-21-2007, 11:47 AM
|
#48 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: LOWELL MI.
Posts: 27
Country:  | sbd's rule  | |
| | |
12-21-2007, 11:48 AM
|
#49 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,270
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Lil'tyger sbd's rule | Very informative!
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" | |
| | |
04-05-2008, 02:08 AM
|
#50 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 52
Country:  | The Dauntless rules.
__________________  | |
| | |
04-05-2008, 06:17 AM
|
#51 | | Der Crewchief
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,270
Country: | Another informative post!
Come on people. If you are going to open up an old thread, please make it worth it.
__________________ US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006 Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes: fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles" "wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2" "ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life" | |
| | |
04-05-2008, 07:56 AM
|
#52 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Tewksbury, New Jersey
Posts: 1,368
Country: | I am going to go with the SBD because it was able to be land or carrier based. It did a lot of damage to Japanese ships and also, as Swede Vejtasa proved it was able to dogfight with Zero's and other fighters. It was an all around great plane that was able to deliver its payload and fight its way back to its carrier...Also, it proved as a good scout airplane early on in the war. | |
| | |
05-17-2008, 05:36 PM
|
#53 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,003
Country:  | I believe that the B7a Grace was armoured, structurally more sound than those aircraft it replaced, and more fire retardant a well. If all this is true, than it is obvious this aircraft is superior. It s performanc is at leas t generation better tan the SBD. The only thing I would say is that by the time the design was finalised, divebombing was not viewed with the same reverance that had prviously been. A divebomber is a vulnerable target, especially to flak.
I am also not sure that the Grace was a great divebomber, because it was a dual role aircraft. This is usually a rcipe for disaster.
__________________
Do not judge on abilities, but on choices | |
| | |
05-17-2008, 08:36 PM
|
#54 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,882
Country:  | Quote:
Originally Posted by Cromwell Blackburn Skua - just to be controversial. Mind you it did work, after a fashion. Blackburn Skua
.. but I must say that I think the Brits failed to take the Blackburns and the Boulton Pauls, get rid of their silly turrets (where appropriate), and make them into half decent carrier borne fighters.
Its not that far-fetched, and they were no good for the RAF after all.
Imagine if all the Defiants had been given even 2 or 4 fwd firing guns, dump the turret, and other Navalisation features like a landing hook ?
It would have really helped early on in the Atlantic when Sea Hurricanes were mostly knackered ex-RAF lash ups, or shot off Catapaults on a one way trip ! | Hey what about the British Barracuda? Sank the "Tirpitz" you know! {revenge for those nasty Stuka's sinking the "Hood"!  }
OK, well at least they helped....
__________________  | |
| | |
05-17-2008, 11:09 PM
|
#55 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,273
Country: | Stukas didn't sink the Hood... | |
| | |
05-17-2008, 11:32 PM
|
#56 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,882
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by kool kitty89 Stukas didn't sink the Hood... | The guys have been jokin' around about the Hood, Kool... Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby Dude - the Ju 87E made a significant contribution to the war effort. Actually, it sunk HMS Hood. | Quote:
Originally Posted by plan_D Really ?  | Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby Yup - 1800kg bomb. You don't think the Bismark was able to do that with it's infantile 15" guns do you? | Quote:
Originally Posted by plan_D All these stories about the Hood, the plot thickens. Someone's lying... | Quote:
Originally Posted by lesofprimus I thought the Hood sank cause someone fogot to put the drain plug in... |
__________________ | |
| | |
05-18-2008, 01:30 AM
|
#57 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,273
Country: | Oh...
But that was written over a year ago... | |
| | |
05-18-2008, 01:52 AM
|
#58 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,882
Country: | Yes Kool K, it was dormant for about a half year before somone re-started it with a brilliant informative analysis.... Quote:
Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet Another informative post!
Come on people. If you are going to open up an old thread, please make it worth it. | But I was serious about the Barracuda, it was a neat aircraft, could be used as TB or DB. Not that I am an expert by any means. 
__________________ | |
| | |
05-18-2008, 04:24 AM
|
#59 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,273
Country: | Yep not a bad bird. But the Helldiver could double as a topedo bomber as well.
And I noticed the thread was dormant I just hadn't read back...
And that post was truely informative. As was the following one.
Last edited by kool kitty89 : 05-18-2008 at 04:29 AM.
| |
| | |
05-19-2008, 12:08 AM
|
#60 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 2,497
Country: | Back to the question.
The SBD may have to be nominated as the single aircraft that contributed the most to the fortunes of WWII over four days as any aircraft other than the B-29.
Other than that the Beast was a more capable wepon system. | |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM. | | |
