How do you pronounce Beaufighter?

[kool kitty89]

I don't think Kittyhawk (even before the British "Tomahawk" and "Mohawk" -P-36- Curtiss had Hawk as a name for a long line of fighters), Buffalo, or Hudson would count for the cities though, and remember they named the P-38 the Lightning as well. (Lockheed had "Atalanta" in mind Atalanta - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

And the Buffalo and Lightning names are quite well suited IMO.

But what I find more interesting is that the British a/c designations were all names only, no numbers or letters for types which pretty much every other country were using.

[freebird]

Originally Posted by kool kitty89

Well the British did name their A-20's "Bostons"

The British had names for all aircraft, a practice that the US picked up on later.

Originally Posted by Oreo

My point exactly. We didn't do it. I think we can also thank them for Dakota, Baltimore, Maryland, Buffalo, Bermuda, and Hudson.

And Liberator...


We are very grateful that the USA was as good at making aircraft but poor at naming them, instead of the other way 'round.

Did you ever wonder why the USA did not win the war with Apache & Atalanta aircraft?

[freebird]

Originally Posted by Thorlifter

Yep.

Bow fi ter (Like bow and arrow)

Boo-fighter.

Rhymes with Foo Fighter?

[kool kitty89]

Thunderbolt was a pretty good name though.

[claidemore]

Originally Posted by kool kitty89

I don't think Kittyhawk (even before the British "Tomahawk" and "Mohawk" -P-36- Curtiss had Hawk as a name for a long line of fighters), Buffalo, or Hudson would count for the cities though, and remember they named the P-38 the Lightning as well. (Lockheed had "Atalanta" in mind Atalanta - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

And the Buffalo and Lightning names are quite well suited IMO.

But what I find more interesting is that the British a/c designations were all names only, no numbers or letters for types which pretty much every other country were using.

Mark 1, Mark V, Mark IX etc? Those are numbers. Also, the MkIX Spitfire was a Type 361. Numbers are confusing and easy to forget, names, if well chosen, stick with you. The system of giving a type a name, and specific models within the type numbers, is a good one.
The Soviets had names for their fighters, of designers or compilations of designers initials, supplemented by model numbers. That seemed to work pretty well for them.

Oreo? Will we be having a poll for the silliest name for a WWII plane?

[kool kitty89]

I said interesting, not necessarily bad...

[Lucky13]

Don't you Yanks also have the Brits to thank for Lightning, Mustang?

[kool kitty89]

As I mentioned...

Originally Posted by kool kitty89

I don't think Kittyhawk (even before the British "Tomahawk" and "Mohawk" -P-36- Curtiss had Hawk as a name for a long line of fighters), Buffalo, or Hudson would count for the cities though, and remember they named the P-38 the Lightning as well. (Lockheed had "Atalanta" in mind Atalanta - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

[Oreo]

Originally Posted by Lucky13

Don't you Yanks also have the Brits to thank for Lightning, Mustang?

They did a whole lot better with the RAF fighters, those I have no complaints. The RN fighters were mainly fish or birds (I guess) what's a Martlet, anyway? Firefly, ok. Fulmar??????? Skua????

[Oreo]

Originally Posted by claidemore

Oreo? Will we be having a poll for the silliest name for a WWII plane?

yeah, good idea. Stay tuned.