|
| |||||||
| Polls Polls and discussion on their results. |
| View Poll Results: Macchi C. 205V vs. Bf 109G-6 | |||
| Macchi C. 205V Serie III |     | 7 | 31.82% |
| Bf 109G-6 |    | 5 | 22.73% |
| The Reggiane Re. 2005 was better than either. |    | 9 | 40.91% |
| Other: |    | 1 | 4.55% |
| Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-20-2009, 12:52 AM
| #1 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,893
| Macchi C. 205 V vs. Bf 109G-6 Bf 109-6 vs. Macchi C. 205V Serie III This version of the Macchi had two cannons in the nose, and two guns in the wings. I debated whether to put the Reggiane Re. 2005 in the poll, because it was possibly even better than the Macchi 205, but in the end decided to go with the Macchi, because of the larger number that were built. Edit: Actually, I did enter the Reggiane Re. 2005 in the poll, against them both.
__________________  "His motor's conked out!" "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!" "Luke, shut up!" "Fear the hook!" "Oh.....I wanna fly." "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?" "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!" Last edited by Soundbreaker Welch?; 05-20-2009 at 12:57 AM. |
|         |
|
05-20-2009, 01:42 AM
| #2 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 4,345
| I'll go with the Macchi C. 205V.
__________________  |
|
| |
|
05-20-2009, 02:52 AM
| #3 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,107
| The Reggiane 2005 is better than both, and I'd rank them like this: 1. Re2005 2. Bf-109 G-6 3. Macchi C.205V
__________________  It was like being pushed by an Angel! - Adolf Galland I'm an educated engineer, so I love being technical and appraising of great inventions. So if you think I am being biased about something: Tell me! Then you'll probably find out that I am not  |
|
| |
|
05-21-2009, 08:13 PM
| #4 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 3,933
| I agree Soren's ranking but always have to ask what the mission profile is - as always there are relative plus and minus comparisons depending on altitude and mission. |
|
| |
|
05-21-2009, 08:41 PM
| #5 |
| The Pop-Tart Whisperer   Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 10,228
| Without any performance specs, I just went with the Bf 109 as I think its just marginally better. But, like drgdg, depends on mission.
__________________  "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" http://www.njcacoa.org/ |
|
| |
|
05-21-2009, 08:53 PM
| #6 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,722
  | I agree with Soren's ranking as well - though I like the way the Macchi looks the best.
__________________ "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" "Those who dwell in the past, condemn the future"  |
|
| |
|
05-21-2009, 09:23 PM
| #7 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Appalachian Foothills in Virginia
Posts: 189
| I have to admit guessing more than being an expert on all the merits/faults of either of these warbirds. but would the Macchi 205 have been a more stable mount in take-offs and landings than the 109G6? |
|
| |
|
05-22-2009, 05:37 AM
| #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Lazio
Posts: 804
| somewhere there is a comparison of 205 and Gustav (no G-6 maybe G-4) i saw in italian and in deutsch |
| |
|
05-25-2009, 01:48 PM
| #9 |
| Der Crewchief   Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 33,152
| I agree with Soren's ranking as well. I however had to vote for the G-6 out of sentimental reasons. 2 votes was just not cutting it! 
__________________  fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"[/I] |
|
| |
|
05-25-2009, 07:12 PM
| #10 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5
| Greetings! Since P-38 pilots of the 82nd Fighter Group had more problems with the MC-205 than the Me-109G, I will take the MC-205. William Green, who has written many books on World War 2 aviation rated the MC 205 as one of the few Axis planes capable of matching the P-51D. Watch your 6! Eagledad |
|
| |
|
05-25-2009, 07:52 PM
| #11 |
| Senior Member  Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Helsinki
Posts: 1,359
| Re2005 had some problems with the strenght of its tail. Juha |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
