Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Most Dangerous Position on a Bomber....?

Polls Discuss Most Dangerous Position on a Bomber....? in the World War II - Aviation forums; Originally Posted by Maestro Originally Posted by GermansRGeniuses hmmmmmm lets consider two things, one is that the B-17 flew ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Polls

View Poll Results: Whats the most dangerous position on an Allied Bomber during WW2?
Nose 32 13.68%
Cockpit 12 5.13%
Top Turret Gunner 6 2.56%
Radio Operator 2 0.85%
Waist Gunner(s) 9 3.85%
Ball Turret Gunner 82 35.04%
Tail Gunner 91 38.89%
Voters: 234. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-15-2004, 03:59 PM   #61
Senior Member
 
GermansRGeniuses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
Send a message via AIM to GermansRGeniuses Send a message via MSN to GermansRGeniuses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maestro
Quote:
Originally Posted by GermansRGeniuses
hmmmmmm lets consider two things, one is that the B-17 flew at daytime making it prey for faster fighters that can actually SEE their target and not have to rely on (excellent) German radar (that you brits copied ), and two, it had 10 crew unlike the 5 of the lanc so half losses could be the same as the lanc but then again, it was a better plane so it didnt have to worry about hiding itslef in the nighttime...
Hmmmmm... I have to point something out: radar was invented by British, not German.

That was one of the many reasons why Britain won the BoB.

(At least, that's what my teacher said in my "History of the 20th century" course in High School.)
i mean the Lichenstein radar that the Germans made and perfected for use in nightfighters. discovered by the brits when a Ju88 landed in Britain as a result of a compass failure
GermansRGeniuses is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-15-2004, 04:05 PM   #62
Senior Member
 
Maestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,070
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Maestro
Oh, right. Sorry, I made a mistake.
__________________
Maestro

http://www.yantremblay.com/
Maestro is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-15-2004, 04:39 PM   #63
Konfused with a 'K'
 
cheddar cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country:
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
most dangerous position on a bomber? id say the missionary postion but who am i to judge
__________________

with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-15-2004, 10:21 PM   #64
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 50
My father who is 83 and still alive was a waist gunner on a B-17 stationed in England (Upper Ipswitch) with the 390th bomb wing. I asked him of all the gun positions on a b-17 which did he think was the safest. His reply was the waist position. He flew over 25 missions over Germany. I have his squadron book and a list of all of his missions that he flew over Germany. Of his airplane crew there are still 4 of the 10 crew members still alive. They still mail cards back and forth and they have done this since the war was over. So I vote for the waist position as being the safest. He agrees that the lower ball turret gunner was the worst position.
ahanswurst is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2004, 06:47 AM   #65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahanswurst
My father who is 83 and still alive was a waist gunner on a B-17 stationed in England (Upper Ipswitch) with the 390th bomb wing. I asked him of all the gun positions on a b-17 which did he think was the safest. His reply was the waist position. He flew over 25 missions over Germany. I have his squadron book and a list of all of his missions that he flew over Germany. Of his airplane crew there are still 4 of the 10 crew members still alive. They still mail cards back and forth and they have done this since the war was over. So I vote for the waist position as being the safest. He agrees that the lower ball turret gunner was the worst position.
Just out of interest is the Ball-turret gunner one of the 4 that still lives?
__________________
bronzewhaler82 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2004, 06:54 AM   #66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese
im sorry, i have to corect some things here

ceiling on a lancaster is 24,000 feet
range is 2530 miles on a lanc
speed of a b-17 is also 287


I checked my source of info and according to another book i've read it states the max height a Lanc could reach was 24,500ft....but even so its still considerably less than the B-17..

The B-17 was still faster at 323mph (i've checked several sources on this)
but you are right that the Lanc had a better range ....still the Lanc doesn't seem as good as the B-17 in general
__________________
bronzewhaler82 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2004, 07:55 AM   #67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by GermansRGeniuses
hmmmmmm lets consider two things, one is that the B-17 flew at daytime making it prey for faster fighters that can actually SEE their target and not have to rely on (excellent) (that you brits copiedGerman radar ), and two, it had 10 crew unlike the 5 of the lanc so half losses could be the same as the lanc but then again, it was a better plane so it didnt have to worry about hiding itslef in the nighttime...
that you brits copiedGerman radar we inented radar
brad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2004, 09:16 AM   #68
Konfused with a 'K'
 
cheddar cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country:
Send a message via AIM to cheddar cheese Send a message via MSN to cheddar cheese
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronzewhaler82
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese
im sorry, i have to corect some things here

ceiling on a lancaster is 24,000 feet
range is 2530 miles on a lanc
speed of a b-17 is also 287


I checked my source of info and according to another book i've read it states the max height a Lanc could reach was 24,500ft....but even so its still considerably less than the B-17..

The B-17 was still faster at 323mph (i've checked several sources on this)
but you are right that the Lanc had a better range ....still the Lanc doesn't seem as good as the B-17 in general
yes, ill agree with the ceiling, i wasnt sure whether it was 24,000 or 24,500ft, but im afraid im uncertain about the speed. im not convinced that it could do 323mph, though i am aware that it was faster than the lancaster now it wasnt by that much, it probbly could just "tickle" 300, but no way 323mph
__________________

with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt...
cheddar cheese is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2004, 02:06 PM   #69
Master of Ewes
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country:
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
Quote:
still the Lanc doesn't seem as good as the B-17 in general
that's 'cos it was better.................
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2004, 06:00 PM   #70
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 661
How was it better?
__________________
bronzewhaler82 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-16-2004, 06:03 PM   #71
Senior Member
 
GermansRGeniuses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
Send a message via AIM to GermansRGeniuses Send a message via MSN to GermansRGeniuses
Quote:
Originally Posted by brad
Quote:
Originally Posted by GermansRGeniuses
hmmmmmm lets consider two things, one is that the B-17 flew at daytime making it prey for faster fighters that can actually SEE their target and not have to rely on (excellent) (that you brits copiedGerman radar ), and two, it had 10 crew unlike the 5 of the lanc so half losses could be the same as the lanc but then again, it was a better plane so it didnt have to worry about hiding itslef in the nighttime...
that you brits copiedGerman radar we inented radar
uruguay didnt invent radar, look at your flag! and i meant GERMAN radar made in GERMANY by the GERMANS in GERMANY
GermansRGeniuses is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-17-2004, 08:32 AM   #72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 250
no iam from britten
brad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-17-2004, 11:59 AM   #73
Master of Ewes
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country:
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
Quote:
How was it better?
payload, manourerability, versitility, looks to name a few...............
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-17-2004, 02:47 PM   #74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Saco, MAINE!!!!
Posts: 894
Country:
Send a message via AIM to MP-Willow
AHHAHAHAAH the fight over the B-17 or Lanc! Just take it as a given the B-24 was made to replace the B-17! The Liberator did just that, in the Pacific and CBI. The B-17 only survived because we needed it, and that in Europe it did have a purpose, letting more B-24s go to the 15th airforce and to the Pacific. I wounder if the B-17 or even the Lanc could have made the Polesti raids and done better then the Liberators!
__________________

Seaplanes Are so nice
MP-Willow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Old 04-18-2004, 02:10 AM   #75
Senior Member
 
GermansRGeniuses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
Send a message via AIM to GermansRGeniuses Send a message via MSN to GermansRGeniuses
Quote:
Originally Posted by brad
no iam from britten
Britten? well if you mean what i think you mean (IT'S BRITAINFOR CHRIST'S SAKES!!!) j/k mate and if you are from BRITAIN, why dont you change your flag accordingly?[/u]
GermansRGeniuses is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Closed Thread



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23