 |
04-15-2004, 03:59 PM
|
#61 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Maestro Quote: |
Originally Posted by GermansRGeniuses hmmmmmm lets consider two things, one is that the B-17 flew at daytime making it prey for faster fighters that can actually SEE their target and not have to rely on (excellent) German radar (that you brits copied  ), and two, it had 10 crew unlike the 5 of the lanc so half losses could be the same as the lanc but then again, it was a better plane so it didnt have to worry about hiding itslef in the nighttime... | Hmmmmm... I have to point something out: radar was invented by British, not German.
That was one of the many reasons why Britain won the BoB.
(At least, that's what my teacher said in my "History of the 20th century" course in High School.) | i mean the Lichenstein radar that the Germans made and perfected for use in nightfighters. discovered by the brits when a Ju88 landed in Britain as a result of a compass failure |
| |
04-15-2004, 04:05 PM
|
#62 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 2,070
Country: | Oh, right. Sorry, I made a mistake. |
| |
04-15-2004, 04:39 PM
|
#63 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | most dangerous position on a bomber? id say the missionary postion but who am i to judge 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
04-15-2004, 10:21 PM
|
#64 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 50
| My father who is 83 and still alive was a waist gunner on a B-17 stationed in England (Upper Ipswitch) with the 390th bomb wing. I asked him of all the gun positions on a b-17 which did he think was the safest. His reply was the waist position. He flew over 25 missions over Germany. I have his squadron book and a list of all of his missions that he flew over Germany. Of his airplane crew there are still 4 of the 10 crew members still alive. They still mail cards back and forth and they have done this since the war was over. So I vote for the waist position as being the safest. He agrees that the lower ball turret gunner was the worst position. |
| |
04-16-2004, 06:47 AM
|
#65 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 661
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by ahanswurst My father who is 83 and still alive was a waist gunner on a B-17 stationed in England (Upper Ipswitch) with the 390th bomb wing. I asked him of all the gun positions on a b-17 which did he think was the safest. His reply was the waist position. He flew over 25 missions over Germany. I have his squadron book and a list of all of his missions that he flew over Germany. Of his airplane crew there are still 4 of the 10 crew members still alive. They still mail cards back and forth and they have done this since the war was over. So I vote for the waist position as being the safest. He agrees that the lower ball turret gunner was the worst position. | Just out of interest is the Ball-turret gunner one of the 4 that still lives?
__________________ |
| |
04-16-2004, 06:54 AM
|
#66 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 661
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese im sorry, i have to corect some things here
ceiling on a lancaster is 24,000 feet
range is 2530 miles on a lanc
speed of a b-17 is also 287  |
I checked my source of info and according to another book i've read it states the max height a Lanc could reach was 24,500ft....but even so its still considerably less than the B-17..
The B-17 was still faster at 323mph (i've checked several sources on this)
but you are right that the Lanc had a better range  ....still the Lanc doesn't seem as good as the B-17 in general 
__________________ |
| |
04-16-2004, 07:55 AM
|
#67 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 250
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by GermansRGeniuses hmmmmmm lets consider two things, one is that the B-17 flew at daytime making it prey for faster fighters that can actually SEE their target and not have to rely on (excellent) (that you brits copiedGerman radar  ), and two, it had 10 crew unlike the 5 of the lanc so half losses could be the same as the lanc but then again, it was a better plane so it didnt have to worry about hiding itslef in the nighttime... | that you brits copiedGerman radar we inented radar  |
| |
04-16-2004, 09:16 AM
|
#68 | | Konfused with a 'K'
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Turin, Italy
Posts: 20,412
Country: | Quote: |
Originally Posted by bronzewhaler82 Quote: |
Originally Posted by cheddar cheese im sorry, i have to corect some things here
ceiling on a lancaster is 24,000 feet
range is 2530 miles on a lanc
speed of a b-17 is also 287  |
I checked my source of info and according to another book i've read it states the max height a Lanc could reach was 24,500ft....but even so its still considerably less than the B-17..
The B-17 was still faster at 323mph (i've checked several sources on this)
but you are right that the Lanc had a better range  ....still the Lanc doesn't seem as good as the B-17 in general  | yes, ill agree with the ceiling, i wasnt sure whether it was 24,000 or 24,500ft, but im afraid im uncertain about the speed. im not convinced that it could do 323mph, though i am aware that it was faster than the lancaster now it wasnt by that much, it probbly could just "tickle" 300, but no way 323mph 
__________________ with my one last gaping breath id apologise for bleeding on your shirt... |
| |
04-16-2004, 02:06 PM
|
#69 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | Quote: |
still the Lanc doesn't seem as good as the B-17 in general
| that's 'cos it was better.................
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
04-16-2004, 06:00 PM
|
#70 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 661
| How was it better? 
__________________ |
| |
04-16-2004, 06:03 PM
|
#71 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by brad Quote: |
Originally Posted by GermansRGeniuses hmmmmmm lets consider two things, one is that the B-17 flew at daytime making it prey for faster fighters that can actually SEE their target and not have to rely on (excellent) (that you brits copiedGerman radar  ), and two, it had 10 crew unlike the 5 of the lanc so half losses could be the same as the lanc but then again, it was a better plane so it didnt have to worry about hiding itslef in the nighttime... | that you brits copiedGerman radar we inented radar  | uruguay didnt invent radar, look at your flag! and i meant GERMAN radar made in GERMANY by the GERMANS in GERMANY |
| |
04-17-2004, 08:32 AM
|
#72 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 250
| no iam from britten |
| |
04-17-2004, 11:59 AM
|
#73 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | payload, manourerability, versitility, looks to name a few...............
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
04-17-2004, 02:47 PM
|
#74 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Saco, MAINE!!!!
Posts: 894
Country: | AHHAHAHAAH the fight over the B-17 or Lanc! Just take it as a given the B-24 was made to replace the B-17! The Liberator did just that, in the Pacific and CBI. The B-17 only survived because we needed it, and that in Europe it did have a purpose, letting more B-24s go to the 15th airforce and to the Pacific. I wounder if the B-17 or even the Lanc could have made the Polesti raids and done better then the Liberators!
__________________ 
Seaplanes Are so nice |
| |
04-18-2004, 02:10 AM
|
#75 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by brad no iam from britten | Britten? well if you mean what i think you mean (IT'S BRITAINFOR CHRIST'S SAKES!!!) j/k mate and if you are from BRITAIN, why dont you change your flag accordingly?[/u] |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM. |  | |