![]() |
| |||||||
| Polls Polls and discussion on their results. |
| View Poll Results: P-51 vs. Hellcat | |||
| P-51 | | 72 | 67.92% |
| Hellcat | | 34 | 32.08% |
| Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 25
| P-51 vs. Hellcat if the two were to fight who do you think would win |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 3,941
| |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montrose, Colorado
Posts: 3,271
| Below 25000 feet it would be pretty even with the Mustang having the ability to seperate out of the fight if needed. Above 25000 feet the P51 B,C or D would have a bigger advantage. The Hellcat would be able to absorb more damage and still be in the fight. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,736
| Hellcat. It was a great fighter. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Thessaloniki Greece
Posts: 4
| hellcat!!!!!!!!P 51 was a great plane but F 6 was better and more stable in middle hights with a better engine and greater design.F-6 and F-8 was to my opinion the best designs of the american industry,the last before the jets.Us navy had earlier jet planes in service so these two great planes din't had the opportunity to proove their worth,because when they went to service,Japan was allready defeated and allmost all her good pilots were dead. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,893
| The Hellcat was a great plane. It could have taken on the FW 190A like the P-51 did.
__________________ ![]() "His motor's conked out!" "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!" "Luke, shut up!" "Fear the hook!" "Oh.....I wanna fly." "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?" "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!" |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Chambersburg
Posts: 665
| My Dad flew the Hellcat in the Pacific, and had his own P-51 as a hobby in the late 1960's. His opinion is he would take the Hellcat into a fight with the 'Stang. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 853
| i think the hellcat would win but if going against a few mustangs it would die
__________________ |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Phila, Pa
Posts: 3,446
| I am a huge fan of the Hellcat. Favorite fighter plane. Would want to fly it, if I got the chance. That being said, I'd give the advantage to the Mustang. This is not based on any technical details other than speed. The Mustang can leave the fight when it wants, has the Hellcat in terms of level speed. Possible climb too. Add those two together and it's the better bird. Probably go give it a shot in IL2 and see what the results are. Not that it proves anything but I'd do a boom and zoom on the Mustang and see what happens. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,764
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 853
| i wouldn't know i have never been to england i want to
__________________ |
| | |
| | #12 |
| The Pop-Tart Whisperer ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 10,236
|
__________________ ![]() "If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!" http://www.njcacoa.org/ |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Utah
Posts: 26
| Hellcat The Hellcat was top scorer during the war and much more rugged with its radial engine. It was a better ground attack aircraft by virtue of its ruggedness. I'd take it in any fight under 25,000 feet and in any ground attack or interdiction role. I'd take the P-51 as an escort and above 25K in altitude. Overall give me the F6F. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: oregon
Posts: 3,941
| Quote:
The F6F barely topped the 51 in air combat scores, was far behind in the toughest strafing of all - German aircraft destroyed on German airfields - and got its scores against much more formidable opponents - 109s/190s and even 262s Different war against non-common opponents, different missions | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,736
| I think I would much rather be in a Hellcat then a Mustang due to the ruggedness of the Hellcat. When you went down in the ETO over the continent due to overheating you became a POW. The Hellcats radial engine saved countless pilots lives by taking abuse that woud force a Mustang pilot to ditch. Ditching in the Pacific was not a good thing. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |