 | |
View Poll Results: What would have been the result of a "Third Wave" at Pearl Harbour | |
The attack would succeed with moderate aircraft losses {15 - 35 aircraft lost}
|    a1952lg, Aaron Brooks Wolters, Adolf Galland Fighter ace, B-17engineer, bockscar43, Brickule, ccheese, ChairmanMilo, chuckn49, davparlr, Desert Fox, devildog, Evil_Merlin, f111_mac, fly boy, FLYBOYJ, germaneering, Glider, Jef_ace_pilot, johnbr, joy17782, Magnuzk, Malacath, Mangrove, Matthew-91, Njaco, nostraferious, Panzerfaust, pbfoot, Renwor, sailor54, Soundbreaker Welch?, syscom3, thedarkmaster, thrawn, timshatz, Tombo, ToughOmbre, twoeagles, v2 | 41 | 69.49% | |
The attack would succeed with heavy losses {50+ IJN aircraft lost}
|    Arsenal VG-33, Captain Easy, Hollywood, holzman, Hot Space, JAGDPANZER, Konigstiger205, magnocain, ppopsie, proton45, Vassili Zaitzev | 11 | 18.64% | |
The attack would not be very successful & with very heavy aircraft losses
|    | 2 | 3.39% | |
The Japanese couldn't have managed a "Third Wave" {explain}
|    | 4 | 6.78% | |
Other
|    | 1 | 1.69% | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 AM. | | |
