Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Poll: Leigh-Mallory 1940

Polls Discuss Poll: Leigh-Mallory 1940 in the World War II - Aviation forums; Curious how everyone feels!? Leigh-Mallory - Do you think Dowding, should have had Leigh-Mallory sacked for his lack of ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > World War II - Aviation > Polls

View Poll Results: Leigh-Mallory 12 Group Commander?
Dowding sacks him, over 11 Group airfield's cover? 4 26.67%
Dowding sacks him, over 'Big Wing' intrigues? 4 26.67%
No change from how it happened? 4 26.67%
Wasn't appointed - judged better qualified for another post? 3 20.00%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-28-2007, 02:33 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 122
Country:
Poll: Leigh-Mallory 1940

Curious how everyone feels!?

Leigh-Mallory

- Do you think Dowding, should have had Leigh-Mallory sacked for his lack of co-operation over the cover for Park's airfields?

- Do you think Dowding should have had Leigh-Mallory sacked for his intrigues over Bader's 'Big Wing'?

- Think no charge necessary from how it originally happened?

- Or think he was ill suited to the post of 12 Group commander in the first place (perhaps more qualified for something else)?

If not Leigh-Mallory, who would you have in charge of 12 Group, whether before (Q:4) BoB or during (Q: 1-2)?
merlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 02:48 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 685
Country:
Hi Merlin,

>Do you think Dowding, should have had Leigh-Mallory sacked for his lack of co-operation over the cover for Park's airfields?

From what I have read, it's my impression you can't really blame Leigh-Mallory as Dowding himself had failed to make his expectations clear to him.

Another problem in judging Leigh-Mallory's role is that according to Winterbotham's "The Ultra Secret", Leigh-Mallory was not given the code-breakers' intelligence information Dowding and Park received.

This really looks a bit like sub-optimum leadership on part of Downing, but maybe the "Big Wing" controversy is actually overestimated in its impact on the conduct of the Battle of Britain anyway ...

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
HoHun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 02:52 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,606
I think that items 1 and 2 are the same. The main problem with the big wing was the time it took to form up in the air. This meant that in nearly ever case by the time they turned up, the enemy had gone.
Glider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 03:34 PM   #4
Member
 
Bernhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 91
Country:
wonder if there where any other choices? I'm thinking at the time there probably wasn't alot of qualified guys to take over his post if he was sacked
Bernhart is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 04:11 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Njaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jersey, United States
Posts: 4,626
Country:
I think I'm with Glider on this. The first 2 questions are similar. Leigh-Mallory was charged with protection of 11 Group airfields and utilized the Big Wing for this - which took precious time to form.

That being said Bernhart is correct that not many candidates were in the wings to replace him unless it was from the frontlines like Tuck.
__________________

"If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's English, thank a soldier!"
Njaco is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2007, 08:05 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
freebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 823
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Njaco View Post
I think I'm with Glider on this. The first 2 questions are similar. Leigh-Mallory was charged with protection of 11 Group airfields and utilized the Big Wing for this - which took precious time to form.

That being said Bernhart is correct that not many candidates were in the wings to replace him unless it was from the frontlines like Tuck.
Saul (13 group -Scotland) or Brand (10 group - West country Somerset/Cornwall) were competant and had proven it in the early raids.

That being said I agree with HoHun, Dowding should have stepped in after the first failure to protect Debden & Weald (Aug 24) He should have ORDERED L. Mallory to protect the vital fields, not waste time with big wings.

L. Mallory comes off as an ambitious schemer, not what you need to deal with in a time of crisis. His handling of the air support for Dieppe was terrible, he was mainly concerned with the air battles, gave little thought to supporting the ground troops.
__________________
freebird is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 03:49 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 122
Country:
Thanks for the feedback.
I think some have missed the distinction in Q2. Obviously the problem with the airfield cover was because of the time taken to form up a 'big wing'. But they are different questions because to operative word in Q2 is intrigues.
That is - the questions in Parliament about it, the conference with Sholto-Douglas - where Dowding & Park are taken aback to find that Leigh-Mallory has Bader with him!!
Granted Dowding performance wasn't brilliant in the sense that:
'fighting area attacks' continued too long,
and ways to spread 'best practise' to all the Squadrons weren't followed.
But if Leigh-Mallory had been in the post so long - why didn't he know the 'system'.
Maybe with his experience - he should have been with the RAF in France!?
merlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 06:40 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Downwind.Maddl-Land's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: York, England
Posts: 255
Country:
As always, there are pros and cons. The 5 Sqn Big Wing was certainly too big. However, the 3 Sqn wing was tried first (but not for long) and became standard later. Therefore, was this configuration probably the optimum and was it expansion for expansion's sake, until it proved too unweildy?

My Armchair theory is 2 Sqn Wings that can mutually support each other if time permits their coordination. A larger version of the Schwarm/Rotte.
Downwind.Maddl-Land is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 02:26 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
freebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 823
Country:
I'm not even sure that Dowding had the authority to have L-Mallory sacked, it would have had to have been OK'ed by the Chief of the Air Staff, Sir Cyril Newall. Since Newall was promoted over Dowding to the post, I don't even know if perhaps he wanted Dowding out, he might not have minded the intrigues.
__________________
freebird is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82