ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.

View Poll Results: Reggiana Re. 2005 vs. Messerschmitt Bf 109F

Voters
72. You may not vote on this poll
  • Reggiana Re. 2005

    23 31.94%
  • Messerschmitt Bf 109F

    45 62.50%
  • Equally matched

    4 5.56%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 50

Reggiana 2005 Vs. Bf 109F

Polls Discuss Reggiana 2005 Vs. Bf 109F in the World War II - Aviation forums; Well, I guess here's another poll. Who wins? For active service, Re 2005 loses.....a lot. But it's a plausible might ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member Soundbreaker Welch?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    1,898
    Country
    United States

    Reggiana 2005 Vs. Bf 109F

    Well, I guess here's another poll. Who wins?

    For active service, Re 2005 loses.....a lot. But it's a plausible might have been.

    Out of the 3 great Italian "Series Five" fighters, I picked the Re 2005, because on the Italian fighter poll on here it won.

    Last edited by Soundbreaker Welch?; 09-17-2007 at 09:39 PM.
    "His motor's conked out!"
    "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!"
    "Luke, shut up!"
    "Fear the hook!"
    "Oh.....I wanna fly."
    "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?"
    "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!"

  2. #2
    Senior Member Thorlifter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dallas, Tx
    Posts
    6,854
    Country
    United States
    Technically they are close, but the 109 was proven and the 2005 did practically nothing. Plus I have read where the 109F was the best handling of all the 109's. I have to go with Willy's baby here.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Konigstiger205's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bucharest
    Posts
    915
    Country
    Romania
    I have to go with the Bf109 here...after all its my favorite plane...

    These airplanes we have today are no more than a perfection of a child's toy made of paper."Henri Coanda"

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,454
    The only reason I went for the 2005 is the additional firepower. 3 x 20 instead of the one on the 109F gives you better options when taking on the Heavy bombers.
    If it were fighter vs fighter then its probably to close to call, but there are other aircraft around and these should be taken into consideration.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Soundbreaker Welch?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    1,898
    Country
    United States
    Plus I have read where the 109F was the best handling of all the 109's
    I heard it from the 109 P-38 poll.

    So I chose it for a closer competition.
    "His motor's conked out!"
    "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!"
    "Luke, shut up!"
    "Fear the hook!"
    "Oh.....I wanna fly."
    "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?"
    "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!"

  6. #6
    Older Than Dirt ccheese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Va.
    Posts
    12,253
    Country
    United States
    .
    Last edited by ccheese; 09-18-2007 at 10:28 AM.








    Real airplanes have round engines and two wings !

  7. #7
    Older Than Dirt ccheese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Virginia Beach, Va.
    Posts
    12,253
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Thorlifter View Post
    Technically they are close, but the 109 was proven
    I gotta go with Thorlifter. The 109 was a proven aircraft.

    Charles








    Real airplanes have round engines and two wings !

  8. #8
    Senior Member Parmigiano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Campospinoso (PV), Italy
    Posts
    714
    Country
    Italy
    Country II
    United States
    makes little sense.. the 2005 was little more than a prototype, plus it was more a contemporary of the Bf109 G2 than 109F.

    Performance and weaponry were superior in the Reggiane, serviceability is unknown.
    One nasty thing they had in common was a certain weakness of the tail structure, fixed in later F with strenghtening rods while, to my knowledge, the correction in the Re 2005 was not implemented before termination of the project.

    Definitely the two 'series 5' who saw some production and activity (The 'half 5' Macchi 205V and the Fiat G55) were superior to the 109F, although probably less pleasant to fly.
    "God is dead" - Friedrich Nietzsche, 1882
    "Nietzsche too" - God, Aug 25, 1900

    He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there wasn't an afterlife. - Douglas Adams

    In those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were real men, women were real women and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were real small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri. - Douglas Adams

  9. #9
    Der Crew Chief DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    USA/Germany
    Posts
    39,310
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    Germany
    I agree with Parm here that it really is not a good poll because the 2005 never really went anywhere. It truely is a what if situation.

    Because of that though I will go with the 109 only becuase well I love the dame thing.


    fly boy:"isnt that the first jet bomber becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

  10. #10
    Senior Member Marcel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Dordrecht
    Posts
    5,177
    Country
    Netherlands
    Quote Originally Posted by DerAdlerIstGelandet View Post
    .

    Because of that though I will go with the 109 only becuase well I love the dame thing.
    ..and the Friedrich was really the best looking one of the bunch

  11. #11
    Senior Member Soundbreaker Welch?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    1,898
    Country
    United States
    although probably less pleasant to fly.
    Why is that, just wondering?
    "His motor's conked out!"
    "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!"
    "Luke, shut up!"
    "Fear the hook!"
    "Oh.....I wanna fly."
    "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?"
    "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!"

  12. #12
    Senior Member Parmigiano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Campospinoso (PV), Italy
    Posts
    714
    Country
    Italy
    Country II
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Soundbreaker Welch? View Post
    Why is that, just wondering?
    Just a deduction...
    The general WWII trend for fighters was that all 'new' airplanes were less pleasant and nastier to fly than their 'daddies', mainly because they were heavier (bigger engines and armament, ballast added to reset CG etc.) and had more power to manage in the same airframe (torque etc.)

    It happened with the 109 F vs G and K, Spit V vs IX etc., P51B vs P51D and so on.

    Now, since the Friedrich was more pleasant than the Gustav mainly because of the added weight of the DB605 vs DB601, most likely the 'series 5' planes who were in the same weight and wingload range of the Bf109G were closer to the Gustav than to the Friedrich in terms of flight behaviour.
    "God is dead" - Friedrich Nietzsche, 1882
    "Nietzsche too" - God, Aug 25, 1900

    He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there wasn't an afterlife. - Douglas Adams

    In those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were real men, women were real women and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were real small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri. - Douglas Adams

  13. #13
    Senior Member Soundbreaker Welch?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    1,898
    Country
    United States
    P51B vs P51D and so on.
    I heard that the gentle, trusty Allison was well liked and the new Merlin a tricky beast.

    Of course some speedy pilots probably liked getting away from the underpowerd Allison and into something Reckless.

    I remember a qoute somewhere like this: Flying the P-51 Mustang was a whole new experience, even though I had already had some flight time in the P-40. The differance was that you flew the P-40, but you became a part of the P-51.

    That's the Merlin model I think.

    Now I'm sure some agree the FW 109D was pleasanter to fly than the FW 190A, but maybe I'm wrong.
    Last edited by Soundbreaker Welch?; 09-19-2007 at 05:57 AM.
    "His motor's conked out!"
    "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!"
    "Luke, shut up!"
    "Fear the hook!"
    "Oh.....I wanna fly."
    "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?"
    "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!"

  14. #14
    Senior Member Parmigiano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Campospinoso (PV), Italy
    Posts
    714
    Country
    Italy
    Country II
    United States
    Well, it goes in the non-measurable area...

    By reading books, interwiews etc. the overall trend is that Bf109 G was nastier than 109F, Spit IX and XIV nastier than I and V, P51D than P51B and so on.
    About the 190, I remember reading that the Dora was often reported as less friendly than the 190A, while definitely more performing.

    It seems that, in general, making the same planes heavier and more powerful had a direct impact on the 'pleasure' of flight.

    Of course, it also seems that 'pleasure of flight' and 'combat effectiveness' are not always related, since no pilot in 1945 wanted to trade a Bf109K with a 109F!

    This 'general trend' may not be valid if you compare different airframes (like P40 and P51, that were a couple of generations apart) or for specific models (i.e. apparently the P38 gained in both performances and pleasureness during her evolution)
    "God is dead" - Friedrich Nietzsche, 1882
    "Nietzsche too" - God, Aug 25, 1900

    He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there wasn't an afterlife. - Douglas Adams

    In those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were real men, women were real women and small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri were real small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri. - Douglas Adams

  15. #15
    Senior Member Soundbreaker Welch?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    1,898
    Country
    United States
    Thanks for clearing that about the FW 190.

    The P-47 was big all around.

    And then, after a certain point, they all became lighter. P-47N, P-51H, and Ta-152H were all lighter than P-47D, P-51D, and FW 190D. (How funny, all D's!)
    Last edited by Soundbreaker Welch?; 09-19-2007 at 10:40 PM.
    "His motor's conked out!"
    "What's the differance, they're all Nazis!"
    "Luke, shut up!"
    "Fear the hook!"
    "Oh.....I wanna fly."
    "You mean the kind that go under water and fly up the stairs?"
    "What you doing? Oh Nooooo!"

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86