 |
06-23-2004, 02:05 PM
|
#151 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | 8x.50cals were fine for ground attack as LG said, they could take out and soft top, and even tanks by shooting at the ground so the bullets would bounce off the ground and up into the bottom of a tank, but the tiffy also made good use of 4x20mm.....................
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-23-2004, 07:59 PM
|
#152 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,057
Country: | That's thing 12.7mm at a high rate of fire had a good chance of destroying just about any German, Soviet or Allied tank. The only ones capable of withstanding the pounding would be the Big Cats.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
06-23-2004, 10:31 PM
|
#153 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| And they wouldn't be able to stand up to 500lb bombs or 127mm rockets. Basically the P-47 was armed to take out whatever it might encounter on the battlefield.
__________________ |
| |
06-24-2004, 07:34 AM
|
#154 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 39
| ofcourse. It did very well with the 8*.50 but it would have been better with 20 mm's i think :I
__________________ Who "gets it" when almost every aircraft you have heard about have a kill:death ratio of everything between 10:1 to 25:1?!
Go figure!;D |
| |
06-24-2004, 11:12 AM
|
#155 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Saco, MAINE!!!!
Posts: 894
Country: | just replace the two inermost guns with 20mm cannon. The trick is the amount of shells to carry and that would be the problum. So LG -I would have to back of my cannon wish as I would need about 50 to 100rounds for good Air to Air and unless I have a high velosity cannon the rate of fire is slower, as I understand and well not good fore speedy fighters.
AS for bouncing rounds off the ground that is not that simple 
__________________ 
Seaplanes Are so nice |
| |
06-24-2004, 12:44 PM
|
#156 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,512
| Typically, the 20mm cannons being used by the Allies had a rate of fire of about 10 rounds per sec. That 50-100 rounds is thus good for 5 to 10 secs of fire. In comparision, the 425rpg that the P-47 was designed to take was equivalent to 34 secs of firing time.
__________________ |
| |
06-24-2004, 12:54 PM
|
#157 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,057
Country: | The bouncing rounds off the ground was mostly by luck. It wasn't a skill, you fire at the tank and some will hit the ground below and maybe ricochet off. Lucky deflection but it's your kill, if you're willing to go against a Panther firing a 12.7mm MG back up at you, you deserve the praise.
Especially in 1944 when they had the Wirbelwind that beautifully crafter Quad-20mm Mobile AA Gun.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
06-24-2004, 02:19 PM
|
#158 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| But the Mg34 and Mg42's were 7.62... Did the Germans use any 12.7mm mg's? Or are you just wrong? (It's ok if you are) They did, however, have 15mm and 13mm mg's but these were for aircraft, and occasionally they were modded and placed on a turret for airfield defense. Who manned the guns? Hilterjugend! I've seen a pic with 4 (!) of these guns set up as AA. |
| |
06-24-2004, 02:53 PM
|
#159 | | Master of Ewes
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country: | any chance you can post it??
__________________ 
"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy." |
| |
06-24-2004, 02:54 PM
|
#160 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,043
| No scanner...  |
| |
06-24-2004, 05:18 PM
|
#161 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,057
Country: | No tank was fitted with AA MGs above 7.62mm as standard. There were higher calibre of 12.7mm (Captured) and 13mm retrofitted later on in the war.
I shall find where it's mentioned, and maybe find a picture for you.
You wouldn't want to go up against a column of tanks with a few of these as support. Some later models were equipped with RADAR.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| |
06-24-2004, 06:14 PM
|
#162 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,267
Country: | actually the turret moved to slowly and the unit with 1st W-SS in the Ardenne lost them all to ground forces. The best defence these put up was protection of the Panthers and Pz IV's of 1st SS against US ground forces where they could bring their 2cm fire to painful effect. Against Allied a/c they were sitting ducks....
E ~ |
| |
06-24-2004, 06:18 PM
|
#163 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,267
Country: | the 4 mgs' ? would you mean the excellent piece 2cm Flakvierling ?
here is another piece of AA that the Allies were glad there were not too many of. Flak-zwilling in 3.7cm. used as a ground and air unit plus tower defence agasint low flying Allied strafers. |
| |
06-24-2004, 06:20 PM
|
#164 | | the old Sage
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 9,267
Country: | here is a pic of a Kriegsmarine version on one of the many ships and used for air defence. 2cm Flakvierling. although a navy version this frou barreled job was used extensively by the Luftwaffe Fla units. |
| |
06-24-2004, 07:05 PM
|
#165 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,057
Country: | The 2cm Vierling Wirbelwind which equipped the Flugabwehrzug of the Panzer Divisions were only seen as poor COMPARED to the 3.7cm FlaK which provided quick effective fire on both Air and Ground targets. Strafing a tank column with these 2cm and 3.7cm Wirbelwinds covering it, was not a fun experience.
__________________ "When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004  To those in that club. |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM. |  | |