ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.

View Poll Results: What is the best of these Dive Bombers

Voters
28. You may not vote on this poll
  • Blackburn Skua

    2 7.14%
  • Junkers Ju 87 Stuka

    9 32.14%
  • Aichi D3A Val

    2 7.14%
  • Douglas SBD D auntless

    15 53.57%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 95
Like Tree8Likes

What is the best of these four Dive Bombers?

Polls Discuss What is the best of these four Dive Bombers? in the World War II - Aviation forums; There is the Stuka, Skua, Val, or the Dauntless...

  1. #1
    Member SamPZLP.7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fargo,ND,USA
    Posts
    52
    Country
    United States
    Blog Entries
    2

    What is the best of these four Dive Bombers?

    There is the Stuka, Skua, Val, or the Dauntless


  2. #2
    Pacific Historian syscom3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    12,114
    The Dauntless of course!
    "Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"

  3. #3
    Senior Member oldcrowcv63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northeast North Carolina
    Posts
    1,344
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    United States
    Dauntless, 4 Sure! 4 its basic performance, historical importance, effectiveness throughout the war, even in the presence of strong fighter opposition. It was upgradable to enhance its capability (through 6 marks, although the last -6 came too late) . An eminently tough aircraft to deflect from its unholy purpose.
    Last edited by oldcrowcv63; 02-26-2012 at 07:54 PM.
    None of us is as smart as all of us...

  4. #4
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    Ju-87D

    - Best bombing accuracy.
    - Automatic pull out system. This may have contributed to accuracy. Pilots knew the aircraft would recover from a dive even if they blacked out or were injured by ground fire. So they could chance diving right to the limit of aircraft capability.
    - No dangerous flight characteristics. Operates well from primative airfields.
    - Very reliable
    - Largest bomb load.
    - Best armor protection.
    - Tied with SBD for greatest max speed.
    - Equally capable at ground attack by placing gun pods on underwing hardpoints.
    - Probably the least expensive of the bunch. 131,175 RM / $52,470.

    The Ju-87 looked ugly and obsolescent but it wasn't. Neither is the modern day A-10. When ground troops are in need of air support these are the aircraft they prefer.

  5. #5
    Senior Member T Bolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    6,649
    Country
    United States
    The North American A-36 Apache should be on the list. From everything I've read it was a very effective dive bomber and could defend it's self because it was in effect a Mustang. The only reason it didn't do more, or was not as well known was that very few of them were Built (500) due to North American switching production of the P-51 from the Allison to the Merlin.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails What is the best of these four Dive Bombers?-p2166610.jpg  

  6. #6
    Senior Member oldcrowcv63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northeast North Carolina
    Posts
    1,344
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by T Bolt View Post
    The North American A-36 Apache should be on the list. From everything I've read it was a very effective dive bomber and could defend it's self because it was in effect a Mustang. The only reason it didn't do more, or was not as well known was that very few of them were Built (500) due to North American switching production of the P-51 from the Allison to the Merlin.
    Hard to argue with a dive bomber that can defend itself, carry about 80% of the payload of an SBD with a similar combat radius. But can it land on a postage stamp floating in the middle of the great watery desert

    I recall seeing a photo of a P-51 rigged for carrier landings so perhaps it would have been possible. I expect there would have been some penalty to such a capabiity retrofit.
    None of us is as smart as all of us...

  7. #7
    Senior Member T Bolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    6,649
    Country
    United States
    Carrier trials on CV-38 Shangri-La on Nov 15, 1944. All went well, but the maximum arrester cable speed (90mph) and the stall speed of the Mustang (82mph) were too close for safety.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails What is the best of these four Dive Bombers?-naval4.jpg  

  8. #8
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    Hard to argue with a dive bomber that can defend itself

    An A-36 carrying a 2,000 lb bomb cannot defend itself any better then a Ju-87D carrying a 1,000 kg bomb. All bombers carrying a payload require fighter escort.

  9. #9
    Senior Member renrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montrose, Colorado
    Posts
    4,534
    Country
    United States
    If you are going to open up the field and include the A36, then why not the Corsair. It could dive more steeply than the SBD and was almost as accurate and it would run rings around the others.

  10. #10
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    open up the field

    The 4 aircraft in the poll were all in service before the end of 1941. So I assume 1941 to be the cut off date.

  11. #11
    Senior Member oldcrowcv63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northeast North Carolina
    Posts
    1,344
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by davebender View Post
    An A-36 carrying a 2,000 lb bomb cannot defend itself any better then a Ju-87D carrying a 1,000 kg bomb. All bombers carrying a payload require fighter escort.
    Dive bombers tend to be most vulnerable after dropping their bombs during their retirement from the target. I would expect the JU-87, the Val or Skua to be more vulnerable than either an SBD or an A-36 during all phases of an attack. Definitely less vulnerable than any of the fighter bombers that came to the fore in the war's latter stages.

    From what I've seen looking, at published specs, the A-36 couldn't carry a 2,000 pound bomb. Whatever it was carrying, I wouldn't expect any dive bomber to defend itself very well before it dropped its payload. A relatively high target approach speed would make the A-36 (Or F4U or F6F) a bit less vulnerable, while the aft-facing flex-guns are the SBD's (or JU-87's) insurance during both phases of an attack. The speed, manueverability, and forward facing armament of the A-36 would seem to be helpful for defense during the retirement phase of an attack.
    Last edited by oldcrowcv63; 03-01-2012 at 08:39 PM.
    None of us is as smart as all of us...

  12. #12
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    High target approach speed make A-36 less vulnerable

    It also makes weapons delivery less accurate. That's why really good CAS aircraft such as the Ju-87D and A-10 fly slowly and rely on heavy armor for protection against ground fire.

  13. #13
    Senior Member oldcrowcv63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northeast North Carolina
    Posts
    1,344
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    United States
    Target approach speed as in the high altitude horizontal run toward the target not the dive down onto the target which of course involves deployment of the dive flaps to slow the airspeed.
    None of us is as smart as all of us...

  14. #14
    Senior Member davebender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    5,239
    Country
    United States

    high altitude horizontal run toward the target

    Most level bombers and dive bombers cruised at 160 to 180mph with a typical bomb load. What was the economical cruise speed of an A-36 when carrying at least 1,000 lbs of ordnance?

  15. #15
    Senior Member oldcrowcv63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Northeast North Carolina
    Posts
    1,344
    Country
    United States
    Country II
    United States
    You know, Dave, that's a really good question!

    I may have been projecting a bias based on experience here. In the modern era, an acceleration to a higher target approach speed above that of the economic cruise is normal. For example, a target approach speed (dirty) from the Initial Point, may be some 50-60 knots faster than that of the economic cruise phase and last for perhaps the last 25-50 miles (4-8 ) minutes of flight to the target. Quite honestly, I don't know what a typical attack speed profile was in WW 2. I just assumed whatever it was, that final approach to the target would be faster for an A-36 than any of the other (Non-fighter bomber type) aircraft listed. It's one thing to do this over land assuming the ground is visible and a pilot has ground reference points to always know the location of the target. It's quite another for a naval dive bomber (could be any of the 4 dedicated dive bomber's listed) which is searching for its target somewhere on the big blue (assuming no ASV-type RADAR for target detection). In that case, the target approach speed may not have increased at all until the push over point.

    You've asked the economical cruise for an A-36. All I can find is what's listed on the web: a cruising speed of 250 mph. America's 100,000 doesn't really provide much that I could find in a quick look on the A-36. I'd be surprised if it were quite that high but I suppose it could be. Would there be a final sprint to the target? I suppose over land there would be, but over water? Dunno! I am hoping somebody here has a better answer.
    Last edited by oldcrowcv63; 03-02-2012 at 09:07 AM.
    None of us is as smart as all of us...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Was the corsair as good a fighter as the spitfire or the FW?
    By Soundbreaker Welch? in forum Aviation
    Replies: 293
    Last Post: 01-29-2012, 05:05 PM
  2. The Best Bf - 109 Variant ?
    By lesofprimus in forum Old Threads
    Replies: 522
    Last Post: 07-12-2005, 11:35 PM
  3. Joe Foss Interview.... The Man, The Legend....
    By lesofprimus in forum Stories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-12-2004, 08:47 AM
  4. best fighter of ww II
    By a finn in forum Old Threads
    Replies: 430
    Last Post: 10-27-2004, 01:09 PM
  5. The Story of Charles Hoffman
    By Crazy in forum Stories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-19-2004, 07:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86