Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

Cold War Intercept

Post-War Discuss Cold War Intercept in the Other Eras forums; Here is some info on the Phoenix AIM-54C. Range In excess of 100 nautical miles (115 statute miles, 184 ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Other Eras > Post-War

View Poll Results: 1950-1980 supreme interceptor?
English Electric Lightning 12 41.38%
F-101B (CF-101B) Voodoo 0 0%
Mirage III 0 0%
MiG-21 1 3.45%
F-104C/G Starfighter 2 6.90%
IAI Kfir 0 0%
F-106 Delta Dart 4 13.79%
F-14 Tomcat 6 20.69%
F-4E Phantom II 1 3.45%
MiG-23S Flogger-B 0 0%
F-15 Eagle 3 10.34%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-13-2005, 07:33 PM   #106
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,477
Here is some info on the Phoenix AIM-54C.

Range In excess of 100 nautical miles (115 statute miles, 184 km)
Speed In excess of 3,000 mph (4,800 kmph)
Guidance System Semi-active and active radar homing
Warheads Proximity fuse, high explosive
Warhead Weight 135 pounds (60.75 kg)

The speed is quite impressive. Almost Mach 5
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 07:34 PM   #107
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,270
Country:
That is actually what I allways thought it was at about Mach 5.
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 09:05 PM   #108
Senior Member
 
plan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,061
Country:
Send a message via MSN to plan_D Send a message via Yahoo to plan_D
No it isn't, most sources count it as Mach 3. And the Lightning was aerodynamically superior to the F-14, no matter the era. The F-14 had a better weapons system.

And, no, that wasn't a good point. The F-101 was inferior to the Lightning as an interceptor. It would be left standing by the Lightning and it's only saving grace is the nuclear tipped missiles ...but they're unguided. And it can't even reach the altitude of the Bison.

The Phoenix would have to make up about five minutes on the Lightning because the F-14 would be that much slower. And high-flying, fast bombers don't exist anymore that's why the F-14 doesn't exist anymore nor does the Phoenix, it's a waste of money. But in the Cold War, they did exist and altitude was needed on top of climb rate, time from ground and speed. The U.S thought the U-2 was safe from interception until a Lightning bounced one at 80,000 feet - could the F-14 do that? No.
__________________
"When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

To those in that club.
plan_D is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 09:06 PM   #109
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,477
Skyflash

"Skyflash is a medium-range radar-guided air-to-air missile. Designed to operate in severe electronic countermeasures conditions"

Range 28 miles ( 45 km )
Speed Mach 4
Propulsion One Aerojet Mk52 Mod 2 or
Rocketdyne Mk38 Mod 4 solid-propellant rocket motor
Guidance Marconi XJ521 monopulse Semi-Active Radar Homing
Warhead 87 lb ( 39.5-kg ) HE fragmentation with contact, delay action fuses.
Launch Weight 425 pounds ( 192.8 kg )

Id say the Phoenix system was superior to the Skyflash in long range intercepts. It was faster, far bigger warhead and far more range. The F14 could also carry six of them, as opposed to two skyflash's for the Lightning.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 09:09 PM   #110
Senior Member
 
plan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,061
Country:
Send a message via MSN to plan_D Send a message via Yahoo to plan_D
The Lightning never carried the Skyflash - the Skyflash was at less risk from being jammed, it was superior technology to the Phoenix. The AIM-54 was too expensive, and that long-range gave it much longer to become confused due to background clutter and jamming. The F-14 also had to stay there until the missile reached a 10 mile range to the target, then it would take over itself.
__________________
"When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

To those in that club.
plan_D is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 09:09 PM   #111
Senior Member
 
syscom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by plan_D
.......that's why the F-14 doesn't exist anymore nor does the Phoenix, it's a waste of money. But in the Cold War, they did exist and altitude was needed on top of climb rate, time from ground and speed. ........
The F14 still exists.

And I do agree with you the F101 was inferior to the Lightning.
__________________
"Pilot to copilot..... what are those mountain goats doing up here in the clouds?"
syscom3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 09:10 PM   #112
Senior Member
 
plan_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12,061
Country:
Send a message via MSN to plan_D Send a message via Yahoo to plan_D
Removed from U.S front-line service ...
__________________
"When you go home tomorrow, don't expect anyone to know what you have been through. Even if they did know, most people probably wouldn't care anyway. Some of you may get the medals you deserve, many more of you will not. But remember this, all of you are now members of the front-line club, and that is the most exclusive club in the world." - Lt. Col. Matthew Maer CO 1st Battalion, the Princess of Wale's Royal Regiment. Camp Abu Naji, Oct. 2004

To those in that club.
plan_D is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 10:59 PM   #113
Senior Member
 
102first_hussars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country:
Im gonna be the Patriotic Canadian again and mention the Avero Arrow,

I know that it never saw combat, among alot of things it never did.

but lets take into consideration what the plane accomplished during its tests. what do we all think it would have been capable of?

Oh and I thought the F-14 was still being used on the carrier, it was just being slowly fazed out by the Superhornet

Pbfoot youve sobered up quite nicely since your previous post eh?
__________________
Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!!
102first_hussars is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 11:17 PM   #114
IP/Mech THE GREAT GAZOO
 
FLYBOYJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 13,585
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 102first_hussars
Im gonna be the Patriotic Canadian again and mention the Avero Arrow,

I know that it never saw combat, among alot of things it never did.

but lets take into consideration what the plane accomplished during its tests. what do we all think it would have been capable of?

Oh and I thought the F-14 was still being used on the carrier, it was just being slowly fazed out by the Superhornet

Pbfoot youve sobered up quite nicely since your previous post eh?
The Arrow would of been a very capable "heavy" interceptor killing Soviet Bombers with ease. It would of been fast and effective against such targets and might of found room as a light tactical nuclear bomber, such as the F-105, but as an air-to-air fighter, it would of been lunch for more maneuverable aircraft. I would put it close to the Lightning, F-4, F-106 or the F-14, but you're looking at "would of, should of, could of" and the only person who could be blamed for that was Diefenbaker....
__________________
"IF ITS RED OR DUSTY, DON'T TOUCH IT"
FLYBOYJ is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 01:32 AM   #115
Senior Member
 
102first_hussars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country:
Yep, the plan for the Arrow was not just a intercepter, it would have been able to carry short range nuke missiles from high altitudes. I heard that Avro Canada improved the guidance system on the sparrow air-air missile is that true?
__________________
Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!!
102first_hussars is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 05:35 AM   #116
He who does not skim
 
Nonskimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,957
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Nonskimmer
I'd read somewhere that they had been working on a Sparrow II that was cancelled along with the plane. It was just a vague reference though, and didn't give a lot of detail. Hmmm.
Nonskimmer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 06:24 AM   #117
Der Crewchief
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 30,270
Country:
Here is why the F-14 is the best interceptor there is. And dont tell me the Lightning can do this, cuz it cant, and dont tell me all this would not matter because the Lightning would fly around and hit all the targets before the Tomcat could even track them. The Lightning never had these capabilites that the Tomcat does.

The F-14 can track up to 24 targets simultaneously with its advanced weapons control system and attack six with Phoenix AIM-54A missiles while continuing to scan the airspace.

Overall, the Navy's Grumman F-14 Tomcat is without equal among today's Free World fighters. Six long-range AIM-54A Phoenix missiles can be guided against six separate threat aircraft at long range by the F-14's AWG-9 weapons control system.

The cockpit is fitted with a Kaiser AN/AVG-12 Head-Up Display (HUD) co-located with an AN/AVA-12 vertical situation display and a horizontal situation display. A Northrop AN/AXX-1 Television Camera Set (TCS) is used for visual target identification at long ranges. Mounted on a chin pod, the TCS is a high resolution closed circuit television system with two cockpit selectable Fields Of View (FOV), wide and narrow. The selected FOV is displayed in the cockpit and can be recorded by the Cockpit Television System. A new TCS, in development, will be installed in all three series aircraft. Electronic Support Measures (ESM) equipment include the Litton AN/ALR-45 radar warning and control system, the Magnavox AN/ALR-50 radar warning receiver, Tracor AN/ALE-29/-39 chaff/flare dispensers (fitted in the rear fuselage between the fins), and Sanders AN/ALQ-100 deception jamming pod.

All this taken from: http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...craft/f-14.htm

Oh and by the way unlike the Lightning, the Tomcat has actual combat intercepts. (If I am wrong and the lightning has ever intercepted anything but the Concorde, please correct me)

an E-2C of the VAW-124 detected two Libyan fighters taking off from the Ghurdabiya-Sirte AB, and moving north at high speed. Two Tomcats - actually belonging to two different CAP-pairs - were sent to intercept, in what was expected to be an exact copy of similar events from the previous day. However, shortly before the two formations passed by each other, the lead Libyan Su-22 apparently fired a K-13M missile towards the lead Tomcat. A controversy developed subsequently if the Libyan indeed fired a missile, or jettisoned a tank, which then - due to the fuel streaming out of it - looked like a missile, but the USN pilots were not to stop the Libyans and ask any questions. As the Sukhois flashed by, both Tomcats turned hard port, reached favorable positions and started to fire AIM-9L Sidewinders. The Libyan leader was shot down by the Tomcat wingman, the „Fast Eagle 102“, and the Libyan wingman was shot down by the leader of the US formation and CO VF-41, Lt.Cdr. Henry Kleeman, which flew as „Fast Eagle 107“. Both Libyan pilots ejected, and were apparently recovered by Libyan rescue teams.
http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_356.shtml
__________________

US Army Blackhawk Crewchief 2000-2006

Classic ww2aircraft.net quotes:

fly boy said: "isn't that the first jet bomber? becasue i have flown one in a flight sim before and i know how it handles"

"wait what ok who made the b-2 crash come on people that messed up its a b-2"

"ah yes the mistel those things are so annoying is games and in real life"
DerAdlerIstGelandet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 07:45 AM   #118
World Traveler
 
Gnomey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,751
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Gnomey Send a message via MSN to Gnomey
Nice post Alder.
__________________


"Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill

"To him the People of the World Largely owe the Freedom and Liberties they Enjoy Today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London


Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum

My Photo Collections on Flickr
Gnomey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 10:26 AM   #119
"Shooter"
 
evangilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 12,880
Country:
Send a message via Yahoo to evangilder
Quote:
Originally Posted by plan_D
The U.S thought the U-2 was safe from interception until a Lightning bounced one at 80,000 feet - could the F-14 do that? No.
Ummm, I have never heard about a Lightning bouncing a U-2 at 80,000 feet. Do you have some source material for this?
__________________


http://www.vg-photo.com

Wherever their bones may lie, the courage of heroes is consecrated in the hearts and engraved in the history of the free. Lt Col Honner DSO MC, 39th Commander speaking of the dead from the battle of Kokoda.
evangilder is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 01:10 PM   #120
Senior Member
 
102first_hussars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country:
Well either way it sure as hell wasnt safe from SAM's
__________________
Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!!
102first_hussars is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com