![]() |
| |||||||
| Post-War A place to discuss post WWII to Vietnam. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,080
| Convair Projects |
| | |
| | #2 |
| aka Dickcheese ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 14,700
| XP-82??.
__________________ "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.] Marines don't have that problem." -- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Michigan
Posts: 78
| Graeme - My suspicion is that the reference in your first scan is a typo. The XF-92A apparently originally carried the XP designation and was changed during the redesignation process in the late '40s early '50s. The F-82 was the Twin Mustang and it also originally carried the P designation. These two scans are from a little picture book titled X-Planes and Prototypes by Jim Winchester. Hope this helps some. Gary |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,080
| Quote:
A Brief History of the Convair F-106 Delta Dart "In 1945, subsequent to a conference attended by Convair, the US Air Force, and Dr. Lippisch, a determination was made that a new and considerably advanced interception aircraft, utilising Dr. Lippisch's theoretical concepts, was needed; consequently, a contract was awarded to Convair for the development of a new experimental supersonic fighter aircraft under requirements of Air Force Project MX-82. The design that resulted, designated by Convair as Model 7002 (known as the "Seven Balls Two" to project engineers and soon to be identified as the US Air Force XP-92) took early form on the drawing board as a ramjet powered delta-wing aircraft with the pilot's cockpit placed inside the forward end of the ramjet intake tube". (The first scan is an advertisement for an upcoming magazine, from 1976-would have been an interesting article) | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Michigan
Posts: 78
| That could explain the confusion. They either picked up the project number, which wouldn't necessarily have any correlation to the designation of the aircraft developed for the project, or it's just a coincidence that the project number matched a typo. Either way it's interesting. Gary |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,080
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| aka Dickcheese ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 14,700
| That's one I've never seen before.
__________________ "Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.] Marines don't have that problem." -- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |