 | f-35 jsf| SitRep Discuss f-35 jsf in the Military Matters forums; I wasn't gonna say anything. It's not like the UK is the only country to delve into STOVL ... |
|
12-11-2006, 11:10 AM
|
#16 | | aka Dickcheese
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,079
Country: | I wasn't gonna say anything. It's not like the UK is the only country to delve into STOVL technologies.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
12-11-2006, 03:16 PM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: New Zealand
Posts: 636
Country: | Hi guys!
I was just thinking. If the F-35 JSF is brought by the USAF, does that mean the Tomcats, Eagles, Falcons and Hornets would all be replaced??
James.
__________________ |
| |
12-11-2006, 04:59 PM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,128
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Bf109_g Hi guys!
I was just thinking. If the F-35 JSF is brought by the USAF, does that mean the Tomcats, Eagles, Falcons and Hornets would all be replaced??
James. | F-14s are already out w/ the USN. USAF is replacing F-16s and A-10s, plus others I think w/ the F-35, and the F-15 is supposed to be replaced by the F-22 eventually.
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines |
| |
12-12-2006, 05:10 AM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,799
| I suspect that some of the F15's will be replaced by F-35 simply because they are not buying enough F-22's. |
| |
12-12-2006, 10:01 AM
|
#20 | | aka Dickcheese
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,079
Country: | EA-18 Growler will be around for quite some time with the new ICAP III technology. F-18s will still serve as the dumptruck and fleet point defense.
F-16s will likely be relegated to ANG over a phased change over to F-35. F-15Es will remain for quite some time along with F-15Cs upgraded with AESA radar. There is even some talk of upgrading F-15s to K version equivalent, though money for that is doubtful at this time. But there is quite a bit of life left on the F-15 airframe. A-10s have just been upgraded with airframe, avionics and precision targeting capability, though they did not fund engine upgrades which were noted as mandatory. A-10s have proven VERY successful and popular for an airframe that was almost phased out over 10 years ago.
F-35 is slated to assume an A-10 type role with directed energy weapons powered from the 40,000lb thrust engines via the transmission coupling. Weapons such as High Power Microwave and Lasers are currently on the drawing board.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts |
| |
12-12-2006, 01:45 PM
|
#21 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,158
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by mkloby F-14s are already out w/ the USN. USAF is replacing F-16s and A-10s, plus others I think w/ the F-35, and the F-15 is supposed to be replaced by the F-22 eventually. |
I am not a fan of replacing the A-10 with the F-35. We had F-86s and F9Fs in Korea and still needed the A-1. In Vietnam we had F-4s, A-7, and A-4s but still needed the A-1, so much so that a new plane was needed, the A-10. The down in the dirt fighting has not changed that much since then. The F-35 will not be hovering around the battlefield giving encouragement (and firepower) to the grunts and depressing the enemy (who is receiving the firepower). The plane continues to prove itself on the modern battlefield. My recommendation, give it to the Army and Marines, I'll bet they would like to have it. |
| |
12-12-2006, 01:50 PM
|
#22 | | aka Dickcheese
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,079
Country: | F-35s are not going to take over the A-10 role. Supplement maybe. Can't afford to shoot down one of those babies in the near term. Last I saw A-10s were slated to be on the books until 2030.
__________________ 
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan Master of Duplicate Posts
Last edited by Matt308 : 12-13-2006 at 05:10 PM.
|
| |
12-12-2006, 10:05 PM
|
#23 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,799
| Quote:
Originally Posted by davparlr I am not a fan of replacing the A-10 with the F-35. We had F-86s and F9Fs in Korea and still needed the A-1. In Vietnam we had F-4s, A-7, and A-4s but still needed the A-1, so much so that a new plane was needed, the A-10. The down in the dirt fighting has not changed that much since then. The F-35 will not be hovering around the battlefield giving encouragement (and firepower) to the grunts and depressing the enemy (who is receiving the firepower). The plane continues to prove itself on the modern battlefield. My recommendation, give it to the Army and Marines, I'll bet they would like to have it. | Have to agree with this. Close support is a dangerous game and you can expect to take hits, with this in mind the A-10 has clear advantages as long as you have control of the skies.
As its very unlikely that anyone will be able to challenge the US in air to air combat, the A-10 would get my vote over the F35. |
| |
12-13-2006, 05:03 PM
|
#24 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: London
Posts: 2,799
| Just read that the USA have signed an undertaking with the UK to hand over the technology that we would need to be self supporting iro the F-35.
With this sorted out there shouldn't be any problems completing the purchase assuming that the Chancellor releases the money to pay for it. For those in overseas who may not know, he is most likely to take over from Blair as Prime Minister as does have a well earned reputation for being the ultimate bean counter. |
| |
12-13-2006, 05:20 PM
|
#25 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 3,128
Country: | Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider Just read that the USA have signed an undertaking with the UK to hand over the technology that we would need to be self supporting iro the F-35.
With this sorted out there shouldn't be any problems completing the purchase assuming that the Chancellor releases the money to pay for it. For those in overseas who may not know, he is most likely to take over from Blair as Prime Minister as does have a well earned reputation for being the ultimate bean counter. |  you can "bean count" the leaps in capabilities this will give you over harriers!
__________________ If the Army and the Navy ever look on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by United States Marines |
| | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM. |  | |