Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums

US Navy Tests Railgun

SitRep Discuss US Navy Tests Railgun in the Military Matters forums; FOXNews.com - Navy Tests High-Tech Railgun in Virginia - Science News | Current Articles Navy Tests High-Tech Railgun in Virginia ...


Go Back   Aircraft of World War II - Warbird Forums > Military Matters > SitRep

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-18-2007, 09:17 PM   #1
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,782
Country:
US Navy Tests Railgun

FOXNews.com - Navy Tests High-Tech Railgun in Virginia - Science News | Current Articles

Navy Tests High-Tech Railgun in Virginia
Thursday, January 18, 2007

DAHLGREN, Va. — Normally, new weaponry tends to make defense more expensive. But the Navy likes to say its new railgun delivers the punch of a missile at bullet prices.

A flashy demonstration of the futuristic and comparatively inexpensive railgun weapon Tuesday at the Naval Surface Warfare Center had Navy brass smiling.

The weapon, which was successfully tested in October at the King George County base, fires nonexplosive projectiles at incredible speeds, using electricity rather than gun powder.

The technology could increase the striking range of U.S. Navy ships more than tenfold by the year 2020.

"It's pretty amazing capability, and it went off without a hitch," said Capt. Joseph McGettigan, commander of NSWC Dahlgren Division.

"The biggest thing is it's real not just something on the drawing board," he said. "It could go to the field right now. We just want to improve it, to make it better."


The railgun works by sending electric current along parallel rails, creating an electromagnetic force so powerful it can fire a metal projectile at tremendous speed.

Because the gun uses electricity and not gunpowder to fire projectiles, it's safer, eliminating the possibility of explosions on ships and vehicles equipped with it. Instead, a powerful pulse generator is used.

The prototype fired at Dahlgren is only an 8-megajoule electromagnetic device, but the one to be used on Navy ships will generate a massive 64 megajoules. Current Navy guns generate about 9 megajoules of muzzle energy.

The railgun's 200 to 250 nautical-mile range will allow Navy ships to strike deep in enemy territory while staying out of reach of hostile forces.

Rear Adm. William E. "Bill" Landay, chief of Naval Research, said Navy railgun progress from the drawing board to reality has been rapid.

"A year ago, this was (just) a good idea we all wanted to pursue," he said.

Elizabeth D'Andrea of the Office of Naval Research said a 32-megajoule lab gun will be delivered to Dahlgren in June.

Charles Garnett, Dahlgren railgun project director, called the projectile fired by the railgun "a supersonic bullet," and the weapon itself is "a very simple device."

He compared the process to charging up a battery on the flash of a digital camera, then pushing the button and "dumping that charge," producing a magnetic field that drives the metal-cased ordnance instead of gun powder.

The projectile fired Tuesday weighed only 3.2 kilograms and had no warhead.

Future railgun ordnance won't be large and heavy, either, but will deliver the punch of a Tomahawk cruise missile because of the immense speed of the projectile at impact.

Garnett compared that force to hitting a target with a Ford Taurus at 380 mph.

"It will take out a building," he said.

Warheads aren't needed because of the massive force of impact.

The range for 5-inch guns now on Navy ships is less than 15 nautical miles, Garnett said. He said the railgun will extend that range to more than 200 nautical miles and strike a target that far away quickly — in 6 minutes. A Tomahawk missile covers that same distance in 8 minutes.

Garnett said specifications call for each railgun to be capable of firing four to six times a day, but he expects to reach a maximum of 10 times per day.

The Navy isn't estimating a price tag at this point, with actual use still about 13 years away. But it does know it will be a comparatively cheap weapon to use.

"A Tomahawk is about a million dollars a shot," McGettigan said.
He said estimates today are that railgun projectiles will cost less than $1,000 each, "but it's going to depend on the electronics."

Projectiles will probably eventually have fins for GPS control and navigation.

To achieve that kind of control and minimize collateral damage, railgun ordnance will require electronic innards that can survive tremendous stress coming out of the muzzle.

"When this thing leaves, it's (under) hundreds of thousands of g's, and the electronics of today won't survive that," he said. "We need to develop something that will survive that many g's."

At the peak of its ballistic trajectory, the projectile will reach an altitude of 500,000 feet, or about 95 miles, actually exiting the Earth's atmosphere.

The railgun will save precious minutes in providing support for U.S. Army and Marine Corps forces on the ground under fire from the enemy.

"The big difference is that with a Tomahawk, planning a mission takes a certain period of time," McGettigan said. "With this, you get GPS coordinates, put that into the system and the response to target is much quicker from call to fire to actual impact."

General Atomics, a San Diego defense contractor, has been working on the pulse power system for the Navy railgun with The Boeing Co., L3 Communications Pulse Sciences, SPARTA Composites, and Jackson Engineering.

General Atomics was awarded a $10 million contract for the project last spring.

The concept is not new. It was born in the 1970s, then promoted two decades ago when President Ronald Reagan proposed the anti-missile "Star Wars" Strategic Defense Initiative.

The SDI rail gun was originally intended to use super high-velocity projectiles to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 11:40 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
102first_hussars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 2,260
Country:
Thats pretty cool stuff
__________________
Hello me...meet the real me.
And my misfits way of life.
A dark black past is my
Most valued possession.
Hindsight is always 20-20,
But looking back its still a bit fuzzy.
Speak of mutually assured destruction?
Nice story...tell it to readers digest!!!
102first_hussars is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 07:05 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Gnomey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Royal Deeside/St Andrews, Scotland, UK
Posts: 11,070
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Gnomey Send a message via MSN to Gnomey
Intersting!
__________________


"Success is not Final, Failure is not Fatal, it is the Courage to Continue that Counts"
Sir Winston Churchill

"To him the people of the world largely owe the Freedom and liberties they enjoy today"
Enscription on Hugh Dowding's (AOC Fighter Command 1936-40) statue in London


Moderator WW2 Talk: A WW2 Discussion Forum
Gnomey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2007, 12:43 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Screaming Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,323
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Screaming Eagle
I spose that kinda shits all over the German WWII rail guns. But don't get me wrong they were still pretty good.
__________________


"Success is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity." - Hitman! - The Technical Guide for the Independent Contractor.
Screaming Eagle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 04:54 AM   #5
Master of Ewes
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country:
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
very impressive stuff, not the world's most impressive rate of fire though which could cause problems if not improved..........
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 08:25 AM   #6
He who does not skim
 
Nonskimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,957
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Nonskimmer
Quote:
Originally Posted by the lancaster kicks ass View Post
very impressive stuff, not the world's most impressive rate of fire though which could cause problems if not improved..........
Keep in mind, these are still early tests. It's a damn impressive weapon just the same. Now they just need to refine it enough to make it practical.
Nonskimmer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 11:19 AM   #7
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,782
Country:
What's interesting about it is the timing for salvos. You can use multiple batteries to fire multiple salvos timing each shot to have them all hit the target at once. Distances are so far that recharging the capacitors and only being capable of 3-5rds per minute become quite formidible. First shot with a high trajectory, next shot less, and so on. I've read papers on these scenarios and they are pretty fascinating. And when you don't miss, the days of pounding a target for hours becomes a thing of the past.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 01:44 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,496
I wonder if that wouldn´t see a revival of the battleship in appearence of a so called "arsenal ship". One of the problems for existing railguns is the recoil. That requires a steady gunplatform and a structurally very strong ship. 5" might well work on frigate class but that´s compromising other key abilities. A larger ship -cruiser sized- could hoist the nuclear powerplants and electric plants to operate much larger railguns. And they are more steady as well. Just imagine what an 11" railgun projectile would present in terms of force! Range would certainly be more like 300-500 mls, about the usual strike distance of tactical bombers. Impact force is incredible. A heavier projectile means that the projectile will have a higher density, more energy retention and thus a much superior impact force.
__________________
---delcyros---
delcyros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 05:49 PM   #9
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,782
Country:
If I recall correctly the guns are currently slated for 5". Recoil is an interesting note, but not incapable of being overcome with physics. In fact, the recoil could "recharge" the capacitors for the next salvo. Large "battleships" with 11in guns are unlikely given the targets and energy levels needed for most. The Arsenal Ship is a concept that is alive and well. Whether it would host rail guns is another matter.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 03:01 PM   #10
Master of Ewes
 
the lancaster kicks ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 19,959
Country:
Send a message via MSN to the lancaster kicks ass
how big're these bad boys gonna be?
__________________

"Reminds me of the time I sank the Tirpitz" comments a Spitfire pilot, "One pass of course, old boy."
the lancaster kicks ass is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 03:21 PM   #11
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,782
Country:
Depictions that I've seen show them about the same size as the planned DD-X 155mm gun but the barrel length appeared to be a bit longer.
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 02:56 AM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Country:
First off, hi everyone, been lurking for too long, great forum.

Recoil?? Theres no detonation, i dont think the round even comes into contact with the 'barrel' during firing and theyre dragged up the barrel all the way along its length, rather than being pushed, i wouldnt have thought there would be any recoil at all?

Interesting topic though, i was supprised by the firing angle stated, thought it would be much more... direct?
Tim the Terrible is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 05:59 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berlin (Kreuzberg)
Posts: 1,496
Recoil is still existing as the energy coupling is electromagnetic instead of chemomechanic. It is indeed significantly less than for chemically powered rifles but nethertheless this equality exists: weight of projectile x muzzle velocity. The expansion power of chamical gazes is not of concern (there obviously is none).

Another serious issue is the developed heat. I wonder, how this huge amount of energy will be channeled away. Could be challanging.

For further details of a USN 5.91" proposed DD rail gun, see:

USA Rail Gun

cheers,
delc
__________________
---delcyros---
delcyros is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 11:58 AM   #14
aka Dickcheese
 
Matt308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 9,782
Country:
For every action there is a reaction. F=ma
__________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if
they made a difference in the world. But, the [U.S.]
Marines don't have that problem."
-- Ronald Reagan

Master of Duplicate Posts
Matt308 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2007, 05:36 AM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Country:
^ Yeah obvious oversight i guess..!
Tim the Terrible is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
   

AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85