ADS NOT DISPLAYED TO REGISTERED USERS.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Question about NACA airfoils

Technical Requests Discuss Question about NACA airfoils in the Technical forums; I recently found a site with a lot of NACA airfoil profiles given as coordinates. When I looked at the ...

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2
    Country
    Austria

    Question about NACA airfoils

    I recently found a site with a lot of NACA airfoil profiles given as coordinates. When I looked at the NACA 0008 and 0009 profiles I found that they were symmetrical about the horizontal (they had no camber). Is there something I'm missing or did early airfoils have to be angled to provide lift?


  2. #2
    Senior Member drgondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Scurry, Texas
    Posts
    6,235
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by philthepile View Post
    I recently found a site with a lot of NACA airfoil profiles given as coordinates. When I looked at the NACA 0008 and 0009 profiles I found that they were symmetrical about the horizontal (they had no camber). Is there something I'm missing or did early airfoils have to be angled to provide lift?
    Many of the early airfoils started with flat bottom surface and curved top surface as these airfoils were more efficient in low speed. Both symmetrical and cambered airfoils give lift but a cambered airfoil may give lift at zero angle of attack with freestream, whereas a symmetrical airfoil requires a finite angle of attack to generate lift.

    Additionally the Theodorsen Transformation yielded a forward solution, using a complex variable mapping of a rotating cylinder immersed in an airflow (think curveball), to design an airfoil with a specific velocity distribution target. - Its immediate application was cambered wings.

    Theodorsen and Von Karman were the leading intellects in the US driving theory and knowledge of thin airfoil theory.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2
    Country
    Austria
    Thank you for the quick reply. I was not aware that airfoils relying on a non zero angle of attack for lift were so common.

  4. #4
    Senior Member drgondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Scurry, Texas
    Posts
    6,235
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by philthepile View Post
    Thank you for the quick reply. I was not aware that airfoils relying on a non zero angle of attack for lift were so common.
    Any symmetrical airfoil, absent flaps, etc would fit that bill. You have to have airflow faster over one surface than the other to achieve a 'lower' pressure compared to the other surface - inverted or upright.

    At zero angle the symmetrical airfoil has equal velocity over both top and bottom surfaces - no lift until AoA changes one direction or the other

  5. #5
    Senior Member drgondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Scurry, Texas
    Posts
    6,235
    Country
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by philthepile View Post
    Thank you for the quick reply. I was not aware that airfoils relying on a non zero angle of attack for lift were so common.
    Any symmetrical airfoil, absent flaps, etc would fit that bill. You have to have airflow faster over one surface than the other to achieve a 'lower' pressure compared to the other surface - inverted or upright.

    At zero angle the symmetrical airfoil has equal velocity over both top and bottom surfaces - no lift until AoA changes one direction or the other.

    As to examples - think of most all USAF fighter a/c since Mustang

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    506
    Country
    United States
    The tail surfaces of most planes are symmetrical airfoils.

    - Ivan.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86