WWII's ugliest fighter (of these options)

WWII's ugliest fighter

  • I-15 / I-153

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • I-16

    Votes: 5 5.3%
  • LaGG-1 / LaGG-3

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • MiG-1 / MiG-3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yak-1 (or later Yak's)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cr. 32

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cr. 42

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • G.50

    Votes: 5 5.3%
  • MC 200

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • C.202 / C.205

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Re 2000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Re 2001

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Re 2002

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Re 2005

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Bf 109 E and earlier

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Bf 109 F and later

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bf 110

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ju 88 fighters

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • he 219

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Me 262

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Me 210 / Me 410

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • Me 163

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • Fw 190A / F / G

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Fw 190 D / Ta 152

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • D 520

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • MB 150 / 151 / 152 / 155

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • Morane Ms 406 etc

    Votes: 4 4.2%
  • Potez 630 series

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Fokker D.XXI

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • PZL P.11, P.7, P.24

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • IAR 80

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • VL Myrsky

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Boomerang

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Rogyzarski

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A6M

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • A5M

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • J2M

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • N1K series

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ki-43

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ki-44

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ki-61

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ki-84

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Skua

    Votes: 25 26.3%
  • Defiant

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • Gladiator

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Meteor

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Whirlwind

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Beaufighter

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • Fulmar

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Firefly

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • Spitfire (!) be prepared to explain

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hurricane

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • Typhoon

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Tempest

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • P-35

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • P-38

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • P-40

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • P-47

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • P-51 (especially razorback models?)

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • P-61

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F2A

    Votes: 4 4.2%
  • F4F

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • F4U

    Votes: 4 4.2%
  • F6F

    Votes: 2 2.1%
  • P-70 / Havoc

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    95

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

always thought that the fiat g 50 and early Machhi looked like the engine was put on as an afterthought.
 
Meanwhile there was the Skua, an ugly plane named after an ugly bird, it decided what it really needed was a turret and to be named after a mythical beast with an ugly name. Gentlemen I give you the Blackburn Roc, the ugliest of ugly ducklings.

The Skua is not a fighter!

(But it was ugly)
 
The Skua is not a fighter!

img413.jpg
 
Last edited:
Would appreciate seeing photos of this SUKA fighter plane. Not one bit familiar with it at all. In the ETO, my 2 top picks for best fighter planes are the P-47 and the P-51, for the USAAF, and the Spitfire for the RAF.
 
Typhoon from my perspective. Great ground attack plane but that intake on it is just by-God hideous and the wings; the plane is an abortion! Gear is too long. It's looks like a retarded Chicken-lady with a jacko-jaw!

It's like when your brother brings a fat-girl to Thanksgiving Dinner. "Sweet Jesus! You can do better than that! What's wrong with you?"

The-Hawker-Typhoon-2.jpg
 
Last edited:
I still hold out that the Typhoon, and it's Ruprecht brother the Tempest, are the worst offenders in the actual "Fighter" category. They are an officers interpretation of the Spitfire. They only worked because the rebel ethos was so strong in the alpha-source.

 
Would appreciate seeing photos of this SUKA fighter plane. Not one bit familiar with it at all. In the ETO, my 2 top picks for best fighter planes are the P-47 and the P-51, for the USAAF, and the Spitfire for the RAF.

The Skua was designed as a dive bomber, not a fighter.
As it had decent speed (for 1937) the British thought it might double as a fighter, but by 1940 it was outclassed.

The Skua's claim to fame is that two FAA Skua squadrons made the first ever sinking of a ship by dive bombing, the German cruiser Konigsberg in Bergen Harbour in 1940.
German cruiser Königsberg - Wikipedia

300px-Königsberg_3.jpg
 
I am always amazed how frightfully well spoken WW2 aviators were, even when their plane is being shot up they utter nothing worse than "Donnerwetter".
 
The Skua was designed as a dive bomber, not a fighter.
As it had decent speed (for 1937) the British thought it might double as a fighter, but by 1940 it was outclassed.

The Skua's claim to fame is that two FAA Skua squadrons made the first ever sinking of a ship by dive bombing, the German cruiser Konigsberg in Bergen Harbour in 1940.
German cruiser Königsberg - Wikipedia

View attachment 482307

The Skua also achieved the UK's first fighter kill of WW2, on 26 September 1939.
 
true but then the DO 18 wasn't a particularly hard aircraft to shoot down.
c28d809d779fc2b0ae7447a4d3465d9f.jpg

No disrespect to the men involved, I am sure the Germans were shooting back and the Skuas had nothing in the way of armor or protected fuel tanks.
But the Do 18 topped out about 155mph and the early ones had a single 7.9mm machine gun in the bow and dorsal positions.
Being able to deal with 'snoopers' is not the same as dealing with attack aircraft let alone enemy fighters.
 
true but then the DO 18 wasn't a particularly hard aircraft to shoot down.
View attachment 482341
No disrespect to the men involved, I am sure the Germans were shooting back and the Skuas had nothing in the way of armor or protected fuel tanks.
But the Do 18 topped out about 155mph and the early ones had a single 7.9mm machine gun in the bow and dorsal positions.
Being able to deal with 'snoopers' is not the same as dealing with attack aircraft let alone enemy fighters.

I wasn't making any claims about the Skua's abilities as a fighter, simply that in addition to being the first aircraft to sink a ship by dive bombing, it also achieved the first fighter air-to-air victory by UK forces. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
True, but while such marks of distinction are interesting they often don't point to any quality of the aircraft, although they do point to the quality of the men flying them.
I believe the first RAF Victory of the war went to a rear gunner of a Fairey Battle (Sgt. F. Letchard) who managed to shoot down a Bf 109. Sure didn't mean you fly Fairey Battles without escort into defended airspace.

The Skua was one of those comprises forced on the RN by the restricted numbers of aircraft on each carrier. Each aircraft had to perform several roles and so was not the best at any one role, although better at some than others. I don't know if the Skua had any 'stretch' in it. Like a few other British aircraft they abandoned it after the MK I and went after shinier new toys that took too long to get into operation.
One wonders how the Dauntless would be remembered if production stopped after the first few hundred and limited them to the original 1000hp engine and no armor or selfsealing tanks.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back