![]() |
| |||||||
| Weapons Systems Tech. Technology behind the weapons and systems within aircraft. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 42
| 30mm "mine" shell I think i asked about this type of ammo a while back but, I'm not sure I know that it was was used by the FW 190 "Sturmbocks" and that 3 rounds were enough to bring down a heavy bomber That seems too hard for me to believe Can anyone give me more detailed info on this ammo & it's effectiveness?
__________________ (img)(/img) |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
| Hi Ralph, >I know that it was was used by the FW 190 "Sturmbocks" and that 3 rounds were enough to bring down a heavy bomber That seems too hard for me to believe Priller's "J.G. 26" mentions that there was one case in which the MK 108 jammed after firing a single shot only, and the targeted bomber blew up anyway. However, that was a very lucky hit. The figures from a German report indicate that you get a 50% kill chance against a heavy bomber from the following number of hits: MG 151/20 (20 mm): 18 hits MK 103/108 (30 mm): 4 hits MK 412 (55 mm): 1 hit MK 214 (50 mm): 1 hit For a 95% kill chance, the follwing numbers are required: MG 151/20 (20 mm): 25 hits MK 103/108 (30 mm): 7.5 hits MK 412 (55 mm): 2.8 hits MK 214 (50 mm): 2.9 hits Regards, Henning (HoHun) |
| | |
| | #3 |
| "Shooter" ![]() | The previous thread on the rounds is here: http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/wea...ell-12821.html (30mm Mine Shell?)
__________________ ![]() http://www.vg-photo.com For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 42
| 30mm mine shell I thought I wrote this question before! Thanks everybody for your kind help and fascinating info!! Ralph Wiggum
__________________ (img)(/img) |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 67
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,765
| Hi Martti, >Can you specify your source? Here is the page of the report with the table ... unfortunately, I don't have any more of this report. Variations of the same comparison show up in different reports and in various books, but this one is the only one I've seen that shows the difference between 95 % and 50 % probability of kill, so I presume it's the most detailed variant and perhaps the source for the others. Regards, Henning (HoHun) Last edited by Micdrow; 12-29-2008 at 09:55 AM. Reason: reduced picture size |
| | |
| | #7 |
| the old Sage ![]() Join Date: May 2004 Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 10,774
| for all of it in a basket it all depended where the hits were placed on a bomber - inboard engines and wing root and that was it -
__________________ Rip it up ! |
| | |
| | #8 |
| “Archive” ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,852
| I forgot I had these documents, they where provided to me by genkideskan a year or two back. Many thanks. Maybe some of you will enjoy them also. Enjoy!!!
__________________ ![]() "Valor does not mean Hero." |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |